markbyrn

Might have mentioned that the vulnerability does not affect newer hardware running on the A12 chip - at least in terms of allowing a viable jailbreak.  Even Forbes and it's hysterical "Apple's Unforgiveable Mistake" article noted it.  

Using both Pixel and Galaxy devices, I don't want to see any of your wishes except maybe 'free' Airpods and stylus but you know they aren't really free - it's built into the S22 Ultra "$1300" base price.  Face ID on the iPhone and even the past PIxel 4XL is far superior to using a fingerprint sensor; not sure why tech pundits push for that and now Apple allows using a mask with Face ID.  Edge to edge might look cool but it's often aggravating with accidental touches.  As for hole punch vs notch, I find the hole punch more annoying (end up hiding it) and I'll be quite annoyed if the iPhone 14 replaces the notch with the two-hole cut-outs.  

Not mentioned of course is the fact that China has long banned all Google apps, Twitter, Facebook,, etc.  This order should have come long ago and strictly as a matter of reciprocity.  

Makes great sense to since Trump called for a boycott of Apple

To quote Apple in 2019, "What happens on your iPhone, stays on your iPhone."  If Cook and company are willing to break that promise, it's safe to assume they won't honor their promise to only scan for CSAM.  As much as Apple's biggest defenders try to spin this betrayal as being noble, CSAM is just the proverbial Trojan Horse.   In 2021, Apple's new mantra will be, "You must surrender privacy under the guise of protecting children."

Did the 'professional' tech media actually verify that Apple had actually sent the DMCA?

Quoting from this jailbreaker on Twitter:

Describing this feature as bullying is repugnant and trivializes the real thing. 

Google engineer straining for IOS gnats while swallowing Android camels.

It's too bad this article doesn't reference the pertinent Appleinsider article on this subject from two weeks ago.  Nevertheless, the choice of this news being the top story is interesting considering there's a top story elsewhere of a strike in India at an iPhone plant over a mass food poisoning incident.  IMO, these legal jousting stories aren't top billing until a final ruling is made and it alters Apple's business conduct.  

1. M1 Mac can run iOS apps by default unless developer explicitly disallows it.

2. Developer explicitly disallows it.

3. Backdoor is found to install app that developer explicitly disallowed.

4. Apple closes backdoor to honor developer's explicit request to not have their iOS app run on M1

5.  Internet: Fake rage and nonsensical soapboxing

6.  Another workaround is found - go back to step 4.