flaneur

About

Username
flaneur
Joined
Visits
107
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,579
Badges
1
Posts
4,526
  • Laurene Powell Jobs' Emerson Collective contributing to $100M funding round for Boom Super...

    airnerd said:
    Will some of that $100M be to subsidize the losses that will come with supersonic transport?  You can't make money on planes that size that need all the special gate equipment and excess fuel.  It's a novelty, as was the Concorde which was used to reward the tier members as very few people paid the cash it cost to ride on the Concorde.  


    Anything that brings a new plane to the market I'm a fan of, but the technology doesn't exist to make a profitable business plan using supersonic travel.  There is zero chance they can get the CASM in line with subsonic travel at 55 seats on the plane and have a RASM >$0.  
    Those were slower times, the Concorde era. The market outlook has improved for faster global transport. More people with wider connections with more money. The Concorde was just ahead of its time.

     The imperative with these things in the history of technology is that they will be done if they can be done. Example: landing and reusing first stage rocket boosters.
    steveaupatchythepirate
  • Apple's smart glasses can change the game in a niche augmented & virtual reality market

    bluefire1 said:
    While I’m a huge Apple fan, I’m not a fan of wearing glasses other then for vision. Period.
    “And you won’t catch me holding one of those gol-danged cellular telephones to my ear, ever. Period.”
    fastasleepberndogwatto_cobralamboaudi4raoulduke42
  • Apple's apology for small amount of 2018 MacBook Pro keyboard failures still isn't enough

    flaneur said:
    Apple's new keyboard is an utter POS. 

    I might as well be whacking the ends of my finger on my desk...
    If you’re whacking the keyboard then you’re “using it wrong.” Many people are tactility challenged and use too much force on computer keyboards. You might be one of these.

    I find the keyboad a joy to use, but I started out on an upright Underwood typewriter back in the 60s at a newspaper, hammering that clunker all day long.

    Once many years ago I was typing on a friend’s computer, and she said “Don’t hit the keys so hard.” I had not been aware that I was, and she made me realize that one should use the minimum force to get the job done. With anything. I learned that also as a mechanic. Some people trash their cars by tearing into driveways or thrashing the transmission or clutch, others don’t. 

    Still, it appears that the butterfly mechanism is way too vulnerable to the heavy-handed. Maybe Apple should have remembered the original meaning of “foolproof,” and made them so.
    Of course! I am typing it wrong!! Thank you, thank you, thank you.  

    /facepalm
    Just a suggestion that maybe a lighter touch would reveal the one benefit of the keyboard. It was you who used the word “whacking.” Sorry if I took your hyperbole literally. You’re welcome, though.
    HenryDJPfastasleeprandominternetpersonelijahg
  • Camera comparison: iPhone 11 versus iPhone 11 Pro

    Really, Andrew, “stereoscopic?” You are abusing that term. There is no separate left/right information in that dog portrait.

    Maybe Apple is doing it too in their marketing of this pseudo-stereoscopic portrait mode, but there’s no reason for you to join them in mangling the meaning of the word.

    What word are you going to use in a year or so when we really have stereoscopic, separate left/right images that are being presented to each eye separately in Apple’s iGlasses?
    zoetmbpscooter63MplsP
  • Jony Ive subject of new National Portrait Gallery commission

    ^^^Talk about switching off. The guy with only one functioning brain hemisphere (the left) judges who is or is not a visionary. 
    chasmjony0
  • Holographic elements could give Apple AR headset an immersive experience


    While possibly not unimportant in the long-term, personally I’d rather Apple delivered on the unspoken promise of their “Project Titan” R&D before a glasses/goggles system which may never be considered an acceptable accessory.
    “May God us keep
    From single vision and Newton’s sleep.”

    Lines meant for those who live in their left hemispheres, from William Blake in 1802. Apple’s mission to develop this new stereo visual technology, which is uniquely suited to the resources and talents of the company, will change the nature of human perception itself.

    Since the invention of 2D media such as the phonetic alphabet and the printed book or page, not to mention 2D cinema and video screens, we’ve been unknowingly crippled by technologies that train our visual systems not to see in depth.

    Wearable 3D vision amplifiers will be much more important than transportation, except now that I think of it, Apple’s version of the automobile will also be an exercise in depth vision and augmented realities.


    yojimbo007
  • Analysts raise Apple targets, see shares going as high as $156 after best-quarter ever

    idrey said:
    idrey said:
    I am impressed with how well AAPL did today. Did not expected that at all. I' been wating for AAPL to go down  To 115 or less to buy some more, and damn, it went the complete opposite direction. There seems to be a lot of different factors going right for Apple right now. And that's good, but, now I don't know if i should wait a little and observe the market see how is AAPL going to behave or buy some more right now. decisions, decisions.
    A Trump trade war with China could screw it up in the short run, which I would treat as an opportunity to buy lots more if there was a significant dip (e.g., if it goes to $115). 


    I agree and I've thought of that, but let's not forget that trump is business man and he might actually do a good job. I'm was not for trump, but he is the president now and he is not a stupid person, on the contrary the son of a bitch is very smart, he just doesn't know how to express him self. 
    "Let's not forget . . ." — you're including me and everybody else in that phrase. 

    I don't forget that he's a businessman, I never thought he was a businessman, but a con man, yes. He and his advisers, who are smarter than he is and tell him what to think (he doesn't read, and he can't do nuance or concepts) are capable of destroying Apple's international system overnight.

    They're ideologically opposed to the cooperative, mutual-benefit global businesses of the future. Apple doesn't do "America first." Simple as that. Not smart enough.
  • Oppenheimer: Apple 'lacks the courage to lead the next generation of innovation'


    altivec88 said:
    flaneur said:
    altivec88 said:
    I"m not even caring that they have failed to innovate.   They can't even keep their current products remotely up to date.  3+ year old MacPro's are unacceptable.  The seamless Mac eco-system is being fragmented and destroyed by the cancelation of key products (Monitors, routers).   Apple monitors are pure source of advertising for a company.  Going into an office and seeing all those lit Apple logo's was fantastic mind share.  Now we get to see plastic LG monitors and have no clue whats running them.  But hey, Apple will only make a hundred million on monitors instead of a 100 billion, so it needs to be axed.

    They have been switching to USB-C for over a year now and yet only 2 models have them.   How am I suppose to buy USB-C peripherals for my company when our MacPro's, iMacs... etc can't use them.   The "Hello" event should have a been a complete transition day for all of Apple's desktops, laptops, iphones, and iPads over to USB-C.  That's how you transition.  I guess, Tim and company really have replaced their computers with iPads because they have no clue how their decisions are affecting people in the real world.
    You are ignorant of any material reasons for Apple's moves. Example: tell us where Apple would get an extra 3 million or so 27" IGZO-backed  LCD screens to supply a new line of Cinema Displays. You can't tell us. Ergo, you are full of . . . hot air.
    LOL... I am ignorant because you believe that Apple is not capable of getting 3 million display panels?  So they are able to source out hundreds of millions of iPhone displays but Apple doesn't have enough clout or money to contract out 3 million 27" panels.     Yah... I'm the ignorant one.

    Am I also ignorant on the 3+ year old MacPro's?   How will Apple be able to source out the Xeon E5's that have been updated two times and the countless new graphics cards that are out?   How will they be able to source out enough USB-C ports for the MacPro.  I know its crazy for me to think that they are capable of getting these parts.
    Even more ignorant than I thought. IPhone screens are LTPS based, not IGZO. Entirely different technology, different sources.
  • Apple cuts prices on USB-C & Thunderbolt 3 gear in response to MacBook Pro backlash

    Farnaby said:
    I use and love Apple since 1988. I would never consider using other products. But today, I have mixed feelings and I'm quite worried about Apple answering my simple needs. It's not these new MBP per se : they seem great machines, I'm very happy about some new features, like the touch bar and the touch ID. And even the USB-C / TB only ports seems a good decision. Apple's bold moves have never been the problem for me. But there's a lack of consistency and direction in the Mac field since years now that the MBP / Iphone 7 just put the light on. 

    So : MBP are for pros, so we keep the minijack... but without the optical port. The USB-C is the only way... but we don't use it for the new Iphone. We help the customers with an adapter for the Lightning only port on the Iphone... but we don't put an USB A/C adapter in MBP boxes. We are proud to impose in a bold move the port of the future and say "Get over it" to the customers... but a week later we make some discounts on some adapters. 

    Aren't there meetings where clear strategies are chosen ? Who thought it would be a good idea to abandon two universal, convenient, easy ports (USB and minijack) at the same time on two major products (iPhone and MBP) WITHOUT making the new solutions compatible (iPhone / USB-C and MBP / lightning) ? I'm not used to Apple sending mixed and contradictory messages. I'd rather have a company that makes errors from time to time but has a vision than this big headless thing that can't decide if it wants to go on with the pro market or to stop, or that explains us that portability justifies the most radical choices… but that makes the exact same choices (thin, thin, thin) on a desktop ? 

    Bottom and concrete line for me : I’m willing to change my early 2009 Mac Pro (a great and robust machine) for 2 or 3 years without finding a product fitting my needs : I considered the 2013 Mac Pro but monitors were too pricey for me at the time. Today the Mac Pro « bin » is too old. The iMac could have been a solution but since the machine is not very flexible, I want it to have the latest port technology, so I’m waiting for TB3… It’s fine because my 2009 Mac Pro works fine, but it’s very frustrating to be willing to buy a new machine, to enjoy the latest OS ans technology and to be unable to do it because Apple is too busy building a car in some warehouse. 

    Surely the new MBP doesn’t deserve such a negative feedback. They must be good machines. But the lack of global strategy, the mixed signals, the hesitations, the severe need for refreshments (iMac, Mac Pro etc.), in one word the context — all this explains the bitterness, the disappointment and sometimes the anger, that a 20% discount on some adapters or some approximative justifications won’t soften. 
    "I use and love Apple since 1988."  Not a good start. Troll meter engaged.

    Anyway, you're basically saying that the failure to remove the headphone jack on the new laptops indicates the lack of a global strategy. Got it.
    nolamacguy
  • Apple exec confirms Logic Pro X getting Touch Bar support by 'early next year'

    blastdoor said:
    jcdinkins said:
    blastdoor said:
    If Apple has a coherent plan for the Mac and for professional/business users, they sure have done a good job of keeping it a secret. 

    You've done a good job at being a troll so...

    Is there a clear plan that I've missed? Can you tell me what it is? 
    Yes, it's there, and you're missing it, along with many others, including the writer of this AI piece. ("Apple has gradually veered away from supporting the professional segment.")

    With the laptops, the path is to pack the most power possible in the most portable possible package. They just released proof of this, and one key strategic technology was bet on by Apple back in 2011, five years ago, when they started putting money into IGZO production development with Sharp. This is the "oxide backplane" that Ive talks about in the MacPro design video that more than anything else has made the shrink in the new form factor possible.

    I'd say go to the Apple store and compare the new 13-inch non-Touch Bar with its predecessor, in overall size and in the brilliance of the display, snd you will see the path for the pros. But you probably won't see. Roger Fingas doesn't get it, Marco Arment doesn't get it. Why should you be able to get it?