jeffdm
About
- Username
- jeffdm
- Joined
- Visits
- 27
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 82
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 12,954
Reactions
Comments
-
wizard69 wrote: » It isn't a niche feature as it is something that has been often asked for. On a side note I've been slowly going through the WWDC videos and have to say Mavericks will be fantastic if it lives up to its billing. Finder is an…
-
sflocal wrote: » When they can't give credible criticism, people resort to childish name-calling and insults. So in that perspective, it's a success. I'm waiting for the first copycat to validate that this is indeed a valid concept. That …
-
eldernorm wrote: » And thanks to Daniel for taking the time to explain in a simple fashion why the long wait. That's the problem, he really didn't explain anything. It's a long piece of tautological fluff.
-
tallest skil wrote: » Here's why it took so long: Not enough people really wanted it. Otherwise Apple would have done it. The people clamoring for tabs were a minuscule minority, is all. I got around to watching the keynote shortly after I…
-
messagepad2100 wrote: » The Mac Mini is the G4 Cube. This is a NeXT Cube! NeXT Tube?
-
eluard wrote: » Do you have even a shred of evidence that that is so? I thought not. In all fairness, the article gave no evidence or citations for its claims WRT delays on tabs. initiator wrote: » Can we please, please, please, all just a…
-
Corrections wrote: » The why is the underlying technology required to support not just the appearance of tabs, but also their functionality Full Screen and across screens. As long as the Finder was tied to the desktop, menu bar and Dock (which …
-
That's interesting, but it would be interesting to know the answer to the headline to greater depth than "it took years of hard work", because that's pretty much a tautology, as in, "It took a long time because it took a long time."
-
drblank wrote: » it needs a new chip, firmware won't help. If it were that easy. Yeah, I bought an iMac in Dec and I wish I was able to wait, but my other iMac was just basically about dead since it was an old Core Duo and it was getting a littl…
-
relic wrote: » Yea, I can guarantee you will never see one of these in a brokerage firm used for trading. Our traders all have Sun/HP workstations with Matrox cards running 6 or more monitors and I have visited over 80 other firms with same config…
-
bestkeptsecret wrote: » My wife keeps looking at the Apple TV Remote and saying how Apple seems to be the only company that is moving towards something like the Monolith from 2001. Looks like the new Time Capsule and Mac Pro are heading that way t…
-
richl wrote: » I wish they'd bothered to plug it in. I'd love to know how well it stays upright with all of the ethernet cables connected. That's a good question. The stand for my Asus router isn't very good and the cords aren't helping it stay…
-
pendergast wrote: » I guess the Samsung/Google astroturfing crew is out in force today. More likely they're just haters, but I get your point. woodstockaeb wrote: » Well, it's nice to know we're not allowed to not like it. You're allowe…
-
I think it looks pretty nice. The Safari compass looks a bit plain, and I wonder if there can be a more modern representation of "phone" than the handset of an old Bakelite phone.
-
mdriftmeyer wrote: » If only they scaled it up 3:2 and allowed one to plug-n-play different GPGPU daughter cards. I'd love to purchase a separate daughter card that had non-FirePro GPGPU dual Processors on it to swap in and out for different needs…
-
mabhatter wrote: » I don't see the issue really, I'm six months out of contract because the iPhone 5 was too soon and I can wait for the 5S. Apple's one-phone-per-year plan fits this model nicely. Once you get on schedule you are only skipping one…
-
dasanman69 wrote: » 4 months doesn't seem like much but that's millions of dollars in extra revenue. I'm sure it does, I agree. Hence the "adding value to shareholders" line.
-
I'm surprised they didn't do it sooner. They have to provide value for their shareholders, after all. lovely. /s It used to be 18 months, then 20 months, I guess why wait, just jump to 24.
-
daewalker wrote: » OSX is great but in terms of productivity, Apple has been left in the dust. iWork has the potential to be amazing, but Apple has neglected one of the most significant reasons why most people use computers - to get work done. …