dabigkahuna
About
- Username
- dabigkahuna
- Joined
- Visits
- 7
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 123
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 465
Reactions
Comments
-
poisednoise said: I wouldn't be surprised if the “free gift” had never been determined. As in, I very much doubt MK ever bothered to really think it through. Who exactly was the free gift offered to anyway? I ordered in early March 2015 and t…
-
TextBladeDenied said: dabigkahuna said: 1. Never said it was okay. I simply pointed out that new tech can have lots of unexpected problems and that the variables are far bigger than you seem to realize. If the above statement is true…
-
poisednoise said: I don't see that there's ever going to be a way to shut this man up, even completely ignoring him won't work although it might mitigate some of the worst of it. I'd suggest you do as I have and ignore him completely. If we …
-
weirdosmurf said: Put another way; you’re apologising for them... Well, I guess that is another way. But I rejected it since it wouldn’t be true.
-
weirdosmurf said: Do you really expect me to dig out the numerous times over the years you’ve said it’s okay that Waytools are 4+yrs later than initially advertised because developing tech is really, really hard and the TextBlade is really, r…
-
TextBladeDenied said: > Obfuscation. You point out one post which had nothing overt to say about you, but ask us to ignore the 500 other posts where you made it all about you? No. It doesn't work like that actually, that’s how it works. I…
-
TextBladeDenied said: It is just about one week since Mark Knighton missed the deadline for the promised May 2019 update. And all the while, Kahuna is standing straight and at attention, ready to soldier on, on behalf of Mark Knighton. R…
-
weirdosmurf said: You are most certainly an apologist for the missed timeframes and delays We have been deep into missed deadlines for awhile now. Please tell me, with examples, when I was an apologist for them? Is this like claiming a hard …
-
weirdosmurf said: You act in a protective and deflective manner, often acting as an apologist for poor conduct on behalf of the vendor or on behalf of the CEO. By doing so, you effectively shield him from scrutiny or needing to respond to valid…
-
TextBladeDenied said: Sorry, but you don't get to set rules that I have to change the way I refer to any company.
-
TextBladeDenied said: You ignore or fail to acknowledge the entirely valid criticism that Mark Knighton has this habit of stating deadlines that are vague, which you then interpret with as much possible vagueness as allowed by logic, and then s…
-
TextBladeDenied said: This is the kind of tripe where people go cross-eyed and fall asleep trying to read your nonsense. You always pull out a strawman when making this argument. You ignore or fail to acknowledge the entirely valid criticism th…
-
TextBladeDenied said: > Screw you. No, I mean really: screw you with a capital FU. And the real TBD returns. > Your answer was dodgy. I answered everything based on how I view things with this or any other company. You just don't li…
-
arkorott said: dabigkahuna said: No idea what you mean by what may happen to other companies who did the same things. As for work habits, I disagree. Because you have to understand where the speaker is coming from. There is no way for a…
-
TextBladeDenied said: I use "they" and "their" because those are the way I refer to every company I'm familiar with. I only occasionally refer specifically to the person in charge of that company, like if I'm referring to something a particu…
-
arkorott said: I did not perceive DBK's comments as misdirecting or misrepresenting. But moving on: @dabigkahuna, a bone for you: What are your thoughts on the state of WT communication ? Do you agree that it is inexcusable and embarrassing…
-
weirdosmurf said: You then took 6 words of that post - “Wow, [t]his should [be] quite an update” - and a post wrote inferring you agreed with his post but went on to post about very much not what he’d said and implying that he and you were o…
-
weirdosmurf said: Not entirely sure how taking 6 words out of someone’s post and then writing a response to infer it meant something 180degrees to what it quite clearly said isn’t misrepresentation Cool. Then all you have to do is show h…
-
weirdosmurf said: so it’s just deliberate misrepresentation then... [shrug] Except I didn't misrepresent anyone. But here you are, once again making it about me
-
weirdosmurf said: Oh koocheekoocheekoo... I don’t think you were Ah, another assumption about me from one of the people who say they aren't making it about me!