tulkas
About
- Username
- tulkas
- Joined
- Visits
- 33
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,275
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,757
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71 I think this shows who made the comment ref untrue info. Admittedly this was off the dailymail so in no way can i guarantee this isn't made up! Looks like it was the Samsung lawyer who made the…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley Until there's a name against it then it's unclear of the source of the "untrue" and "inaccurate" claim. Samsung claimed that, but I've not seen anything that definitively attributes it to a j…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71 And what about the many worldwide cases that haven't gone in apple's favour? Surely they too would add context to the uk decision rather than putting comments which imply the england verdict is …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley That is an unsatisfactory reference; it's not clear who is saying that. Hardly just cause for criticising the entire legal process and integrity of the judges. Better luck next time…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley For the third time, can you back up this claim that the court has said Apple have made a false statement? I have only seen them describe it as non-compliant. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy Very last try: The German court cannot find infringement where a final EU-wide ruling finds there was none. So NO there is no finding of infringement by a German court. Apple's legal counsel under…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71 man, you don't stop do you? You need to go back to the reason for this thread. What you keep going on about is noise - the english court required apple to do something simple - they were to red…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley But it isn't relevant and affects the context of the court ordered statement. It's wilfully clouding the intent. That's the problem, and that's why they're in trouble. Maybe that is true. Tha…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy No sir. I tried as best I could to explain why and can't think of anything more to help you understand something you're obviously struggling with. I'll let you and the handful of others still carry…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71 The german court tried to find that samsung infringed but they had no jurisdiction to do so. So to put a statement on the apple site but not explain that regardless of what the german cour…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by arrowspark The judge is right. Apple's Statement is so convoluted and long. They turned what could have been stated VERY CLEARLY in two sentences into a whole editorial that few people would bother to rea…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71 Give up Gatorguy, we just have to accept that some apple fans simply won't see other side of arguments & think that one of the fairest & most respected legal systems in the world is…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy Then if there's a valid EU-wide judgement from the German courts Apple should enforce it. . . Oh, wait.... I never claimed the could enforce it. The UK courts saw to that. Don't try a strawma…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy Not to the best of my knowledge it was not. It only concerned a preliminary sales ban within the German borders with any actual ruling of infringement coming at a later trial on the case itself. Th…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy Yes, quite sure. You'e making the mistake of mixing a preliminary finding that even if valid would apply to only a single country (Germany) with a final ruling from the UK action acting as an EU pa…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy Argue all you want. There is no valid finding of infringement of Apple's Community Design by any German Court. Period. Did a german court find that Samsung infringed?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71 I think you'll find that the telegraph link is irrelevant as the english court decision hadn't overruled that when the article was published on 24th July. Note the key comment on the engli…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gatorguy Tulkas, the problem arose when Apple continued to press for a preliminary injunction on the Tab 7.7 in Germany during and even after the UK judgement that applied to the entire European Union, Germ…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by reefoid What about the fact the German case they mentioned hasn't reached trial yet but they implied the German court had made a final decision? Or bringing the US case into it where the Ta…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by reefoid Judge's comment: Which part of: "Subject to anything that may be submitted by either side I would propose the following:" do you not understand? …