tulkas
About
- Username
- tulkas
- Joined
- Visits
- 33
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,275
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,757
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by whatever71 Tulkas, are you being serious here? Can you take off your blinkers just for a few minutes & think about this? Which bit of a statement on the apple site along the lines of.. and samsung wil…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Nathillien Your point being? Apple got the order to put this EXACT quote (and link) on its webpages - nothing more nothing less: “On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by incidntcoordntr Am I getting the facts correct ? Apple has been asked to write the original 'apology' letter because they tried to sue over design patents but lost ? it that it ? the fact that th…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley Ah, I see. Yes, if your presumption is that Apple shouldn't have expected this reaction then the beer is a better analogy. I disagree with the premise though, so I'll stick with the pickles …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley Then this is where we disagree. I think this is bull. Apple knew full well what they were doing and saying. Maybe they thought the court wouldn't take any action over it, but they sure as hell kn…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley Did you miss the part where I said the kid is fully aware of the Dad's dislike for pickles and put them in deliberately? I'm amazed by the dual standards of requiring that Apple receive co…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Scaramanga89 It looks a shitload better than yours Skil. We don't have to bring guns to school. Would they be able to figure out how to use them?
-
Quote: Originally Posted by malax Apple was instructed to put "the notice" (that particular statement) "on the Apple homepage." Apple argued that it would clutter things up, and asked if they could just link to it. The appeals…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hattig They said they would post "the notice". They posted "the notice" plus four paragraphs of advertorial undermining the notice. They generalised the results of the US case - wh…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by webweasel Thanks. I think you're cherry-picking though. It's clear that the appeal judges were pretty annoyed that Apple had tried to seek an alternative verdict in Germany after Judge Birss' earlier findi…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by malax Thanks. The wrinkle is in "He proposed that instead of requiring the notice to be on the web page itself, it would be sufficient if there were a link provided from that to the notice. There are some …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hattig http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20121101091853360 They showed disrespect to a court of law. Now they are being slapped down for it, end of. How?
-
So, apparently no a single person can come up with a single part of Apple's statement that was untrue and incorrect. No one person can provide evidence on how Apple was in breach. I really an eager to read the actual details of this newe…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by malax Can you post a link to the appeals court ruling? All I could find was the original trial ruling http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/2049.html Based on that it's clear tha…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by webweasel Point 1 - That makes more sense. I've corrected my post. Point 2 - Do you have a link for that? http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html See #82 Quote:…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by stike vomit Well, the judge thought otherwise. Forgive me for valuing the legal acumen of a high court judge over that of an internet forum moderator. Judges are human too and can make mistakes. …
-
For everyone saying Apple somehow disobeyed the court, broke rules, or included untrue statements, please at least read the ruling first. Don't make statements based in ignorance. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html
-
Quote: Originally Posted by fredawest The original Bloomberg report quotes are not attributed to the Judge, you'll find it is what Samsung claimed at the hearing, the Judges upheld the view that the statement was inaccurate. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by webweasel A little background to this story wouldn't go amiss before people start throwing their toys out of the pram. As far as I can remember Apple initiated proceedings against Samsung in the U…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hattig The fact is that the court has made a ruling that Apple did not follow the legal requirements for posting a notice. I.e., the court has said that adding additional "facts" is not allo…