clive

About

Username
clive
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
-
Roles
member
Badges
0
Posts
720

Reactions

0Like0Informative

Comments

  • Quote: Originally posted by Paul what do you think? Really? I think you're an ignorant twat.
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Kickaha Really, in the time it's taken you to dig yourself this hole, don't you think you could have written the JavaScript, put it on a page, given us a link and said "Go to it, wankers!" ? Oh, so, that would do i…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by curiousuburb so for the extra security conscious folk who turn javascript off in Safari's Preferences So what have you proven, that you closed one of the vulnerabilities that you said previously did not exist. H…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Kickaha You're the one making absolute claims. Prove them. No, you are claiming that I am wrong, that's an absolute. Someone else claimed I was wrong - I proved otherwise. What I wrote was that the risk to X…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Kickaha No, because, you irrational moron, you can't prove a negative. Jeez. First premise of this little thing we like to call LOGIC. Well, use it. I already proved that a JavaScript DOS attack is possible, tell …
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Wrong Robot but yet thousands of mac-users can easily be wrong for thinking that their OS is more or less impermeable to serious 'malware' Millions of people think that petrol is flammable, but in fact it's petrol v…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Wrong Robot No, I'm saying you shouldn't be so surprised that people can be so stubborn. So, we therefore accept that *bad things can happen* that are outside our sphere of knowledge? I think that's QED, no?
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Kickaha Sorry... proof? Do you want to argue about spelling or do you want to argue about security?
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Wrong Robot Just as I *Firmly* proved that viruses... So, what are you saying, JavaScript DOS attack cannot happen?
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Kickaha I posted that waaaaaay back in the 10th post in this thread. Funny, Clive ignored that. Uh, read my comment about "CANADA" above. You might care to ponder what caused *me* to post this thread in the first…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Wrong Robot are you asking him to be as stubborn as you were with the viruses/virii thing I'm saying I've already proven the point. Don't keep asking me to do the card trick again just so you can see up my sleeve.
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by curiousuburb Call as in poker. wagers have been made. show cards. If you don't want to demonstrate a worm or virus, post the links to your previously discussed OS X vulnerabilities I have already shown my roya…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Wrong Robot Well, just like I presented the evidence for why viruses is the correct plural of virus, I think many people here would like to see the evidence to your claims about how vulnerable OS X is, I don't think th…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by alcimedes 'If you're a bad guy and you want to frustrate law enforcement, use a Mac.'" Read the story: "except if you're in Canada"
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by curiousuburb call ... home ET?
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Wrong Robot wait, so you do know of flaws that could be exploited specifically, then why'd you go in such a round-about way with this thread? couldn't you have just said "I found such and such security thing that could…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Paul you sir are a troll... unless you post some substance... Read the post immediately above, dumkopf. JavaScript... DOS... no authentication. Thank you.
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Paul I believe it is impossible... Then, think different. Quote: Originally posted by Paul ...and if it is possible it will get patched before you even post here about it. I don't really see how something…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by alcimedes so it's really easy, you could do it in under 24 hours, and no one in the world has done it yet. You wrote that, not me. Quote: Originally posted by alcimedes with all the windows users who just hat…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004
  • Quote: Originally posted by Brad Who is to say someone hasn't tried? Who's to say they haven't succeeded? Quote: Originally posted by Brad You've done fine well to lay out your theories about computing habits, but you have yet to lay out…
    in Viruses, you got 'em. Comment by clive January 2004