coolfactor

About

Username
coolfactor
Joined
Visits
747
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,922
Badges
1
Posts
2,411
  • Calls for Tim Cook's resignation over Apple Intelligence miss that he has made Apple what ...


    jas99 said:
    xbit said:
    Apple Intelligence feels like a me too product designed to appeal to investors rather than consumers. Almost every iPhone user I know hates it and asks me how you can switch it off.

    I don’t blame Tim Cook though as every tech company is expected to bet the farm on gen AI. Cook would be eviscerated by the markets if Apple didn’t have a gen AI strategy. There’s a lot of hype but no-one has a product that works as promised.


    I think Apple users are a lot more savvy than the average consumer. I think the AI “revolution” is a mix of lies, misunderstanding, and intentional false hype. The large language models (LLMs) create the impression of intelligence but possess none. But that’s enough to fool huge swaths of the human population. One of Apple’s internal communications was, “The last thing the world needs is another chatbot.” And Apple was right. But it was forced to do something by the - let’s just say it - gullible masses who bought the AI lies. Maybe that’s the one thing I can say it did wrong - jump on the bandwagon instead of exposing it for the lie it is?

    I think a lot of Apple users know this and are simply not interested in AI - even if it’s Apple’s version. I get it. The last thing I want is some LLM making nonsensical statements in my e-mail messages to other people. I don’t need help writing. Get the heck out of my way. That’s why lots of Apple users are turning it off.

    The only thing that worries me now is that if Apple relies too heavily on LLMs it can never have a reliable Apple Intelligence product. Why? Because LLMs hallucinate shockingly high percentages of the time. LLMs are just plain wrong - a LOT. I know Apple knows this. I know Apple has been developing neural processors for a long, long time. I know Apple has the best and brightest people. I know they are amazing managers - honest, caring, really great corporate citizens. So I trust they are doing the wise thing with Apple Intelligence, even if it takes longer. Doing things well takes longer. And I’m sick of those who can’t criticizing those who can.

    AI is not a lie. LLMs are just one piece of the tech. It's not just an impression of intelligence, but the closest thing to real intelligence that we've had. You're right that we still have a long way to go, and one of Apple's research projects demonstrated how current logic processing could be done much better.

    AI will improve drastically –because– of Apple's involvement, as do many aspects of technology that we now take for granted.
    ronn
  • Calls for Tim Cook's resignation over Apple Intelligence miss that he has made Apple what ...

    zoetmb said:
    I don’t think he needs to resign as from a financial standpoint, he’s handled the company brilliantly.  But maybe he needs to bring in a new senior executive with more product orientation.  

    It seems to me that the car and A.I. failures are primarily the responsibility of the executives in charge of those efforts.  Maybe THEY need to be replaced. 

    Years ago, I predicted that Apple would have primarily been a  robotics and AI company by now.   But it sure seems like Boston Dynamics (now owned by Hyundai), maybe Tesla )depending upon how fake Musk’s demos have been) and a number of Japanese and Chinese companies are way ahead of them.  

    IMO, Apple does have to find a new big business because phones and services are not going to sustain them in the long run.  Macs and iPads are already a relatively small part of the business.  

    The Vision product lineup is the next big thing. We haven't seen anything yet, pun intended. Apple has a much bigger vision than we've seen!

    Tim has done well, including passing product announcements off to a broader range of folks lately.

    ronnwatto_cobra
  • Apple is lying about Apple Intelligence, John Gruber says -- and he's right

    Apple should've embraced the AI wave, but focused on how Apple hardware and software excels at running existing AI tech. Then later, swooped in with Apple Intelligence only when it was ready, The iPod and iPhone both succeeded by using that approach.
    ronnwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Apple is lying about Apple Intelligence, John Gruber says -- and he's right


    OpenAI bursting into the market with ChatGPT really threw imbalance into the market. Suddenly Apple's steady, incremental approach no longer worked, and a key capability — foundational AI frameworks — were lacking in their operating systems.

    A year from now, this will all be moot. Siri will be upgraded, and millions of people will be using Apple's tech in favour of the competition. 

    The wait will be worth it, but let's hope that Apple has learned their lesson not to put the cart before the horse. Don't announce something prematurely!
    ronnwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Bose Ultra Open wireless earbuds review: Great, but buy AirPods instead

    The connectivity problem isn’t Bose’s. It’s Apple hobbling other products and you know it. If you don’t, you don’t deserve this post and platform you’re dispensing falsehood from.  
    Ya, that claim fits into the same chapter as the moon landing being a Hollywood production. Nonsense.
    watto_cobra