stantheman
About
- Username
- stantheman
- Joined
- Visits
- 58
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 659
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 332
Reactions
-
Researcher calls Samsung's Tizen OS "the worst code I've ever seen"
-
Google Calendar gains native Apple iPad interface with latest iOS update
-
AT&T, Verizon join firms pulling millions in ads from Google, YouTube over hate, terrorist...
-
Apple-backed think tank calls for radical changes to Chinese economic policy
Yesterday a Chinese official was in the newspaper threatening that the US is more vulnerable to a trade war than China. That's like Trump talking about his big hands and the historic size of the crowd at his inauguration. Reveal your deeper insecurity by insisting on the opposite, loudly and repeatedly.
When Foxconn-Apple finally has plants outside of China filled with robots and domestic (Indian?) workers, it will have more options for resisting Chinese meddling-sabotage than it does today. It would be terrible if (hypothetically) China banned new iPhone sales in that nation, but even worse if Chinese regulators impeded iPhone manufacturing at Chinese-based plants. That would block iPhone sales everywhere.
In the long run, a trade war with China may be the only way to get its leaders to moderate their views. No bully will stop bullying until circumstances force him to reconsider the error of his ways. -
Australian banks call alternatives to NFC 'unrealistic' in fight to avoid using Apple Pay
The Australian banks want detailed transaction data plus ApplePay fees, but those fees are tiny and therefore only a sideshow.
Australia has a very small number of banks, and in this instance they are attempting to behave as a cartel (group monopoly) both to pressure local politicians and (if successful) to use consumer data for marketing-advertising purposes.
Collusion is difficult to manage successfully, except in small groups. If Australian banks are able to collude on this issue, they may be colluding on others, too.