cropr

About

Username
cropr
Joined
Visits
160
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,373
Badges
2
Posts
1,149
  • Apple defends its controversial EU App Store plans

    chasm said:
    Make no mistake about what Apple is saying here. The bottom line on this from a user’s perspective is simple:

    Developers would LOVE to make more money collecting lots of extra data about users and selling that data to entities like Google and data brokers.

    Apple’s App Store rules make that difficult-to-impossible, and puts some control of this in the USER’S hands. For example, the pop-up on new apps that asks you if it’s okay for this app to track you, and (unless you’re an idiot) you say NO.

    You WILL NOT SEE that warning/option in apps you get from other App Stores, because that’s the ONLY way they can attract developers. And they’ll primarily attract skeevy developers running frauds, scams, crypto schemes and other shady ventures, including gambling and porn apps. And Epic, because they are also skeevy.

    I’m not a fan of Apple’s monolithic App Store, and would have preferred if the EU had mandated alternative App Stores that complied 100 percent with Apple’s own self-imposed security/privacy rules, but that was unrealistic.

    But users don’t have be suckers. Use EXTREME caution if and when you download anything from alternative app stores, because there’s probably a reason the app is in there instead of the “real” App Store, and that will ALWAYS have to do with either data gathering/selling, and/or apps that push scams/frauds, or at BEST legit gambling/porn apps.
    Being an app developer living in the EU, it must say that your comment is far from the truth.    First of all, I do not love to collect data,  selling it to data brokers.  Such a practice is illegal in the EU, there is something called GDPR that imposes heavy fines if I would collect and sell data.
     
    Any app that distributed in the EU must comply with the GDPR rules: it must inform the user that user data is collected and it must offer an opt-out option.  Bear in mind that some of the Apple security and privacy rules were adapted to be aligned with the GDPR, when the GDPR came into force.  (Apple did apply these modifications globally)

    Any alternative app store in the EU can only distribute apps that comply to the GDPR rules. 

    The real benefit of an alternative app store is that the app developer is no longer bound the some restrictive app store rules, that have nothing to do witjh security or privacy. 

    The app developer will be allowed to offer discounts, to do cross seliing opportunities, to have one single secure cross platform payment server (huge improvement in operational costs), and to have a fixed pricing in Euro which does not change when the "Apple" USD / EUR exchange rate changes
    avon b7williamlondonmuthuk_vanalingam
  • Fake crypto app on the App Store has stolen thousands of dollars already [u]

    What's less surprising than the fact that fake apps can make it through Apple's overwhelmed review process is the fact that Apple does such a poor job of taking them down when they are reported. You would think that fake apps would be taken down within days of being reported by a legitimate source, rather than remaining in the app store for months or years. 

    There is a case to be made for a non Apple app store that does a better job than Apple of providing properly curated apps. But, users are going to have to figure out which ones are trustworthy by themselves, creating an annoying meta problem. 
    Suppose Microsoft is creating an iOS app store, only distributing Microsoft developed apps.   And Microsoft comes with the message that its app store is more secure than the general Apple App store, which can apparently contain risky apps.  Case made

    muthuk_vanalingam
  • United States Apple Watch import ban has begun with no resolution in sight

    tht said:

    The hard part is the marketing and engineering. That's 99.9% of the job, not the whatever is in the patent. It is really doubtful any of that can be stolen. Any company that productizes an idea spends the same amount of resources on the engineering and trying to get into market, which are closely guarded trade secrets. The actual value. That's why I say Apple stole nothing from Masimo, and Apple likely spent more resources on the Apple Watch blood oxygen measurement feature than Masimo ever did on their devices, as Apple's scale and standards are quite large relative to other companies.

    So Apple can steal any patented technolopgy from smaller companies because Apple has the marketing machine to sell much more products than these smaller companies.   What a splendid concept. Never thought about that one.

    Maybe you should patent this great concept.

    But wait, ...  Apple could just copy your concept for free because it has the big marketing machine.  So don't bother
    muthuk_vanalingamgatorguyMplsP
  • Beeper Mini is down for 5% of users, but there's a fix

    chasm said:
    People who choose WhatsApp — and many millions of people do — are giving Meta/FaceBook your data (maybe — or maybe not — the content of your messages, but lots and lots of other data) to sell to advertisers and media manipulators.
    Depends on where you live.  When Facebook acquired Whatsapp, the EU explicitely put in the acquisation condiftions, that in the EU Facebook was not allowed to exchange any data between the Whatsapp ecosystem and the Facebook ecosystem.  As a consequence the EULA for Whatsapp in the EU differs considerably from the one in the rest of the world.  

    Whatsapp is in the EU is secure, cross platform messaging app with no strings attached, and has become the de facto standard in the EU even for iOS users.

    Just before Facebook became  Meta, Facebook tried to alter the EULA of Whatsapp in the EU, disguided as an "upgrade", but EU commission immediately reminded Facebook of the applicable acquisation conditions

    gatorguyronnmuthuk_vanalingam
  • Apple files legal challenge over Europe's demand for third-party app stores

    JaiOh81 said:
    chelin said:
    aldanno said:
    Just imagine if Circle K was forced to carry every brand candy, soda and beer. Also imagine they weren't free to mark-up their product prices as they saw fit! No one is asking the Apple Retail Stores to stock every iPhone charger, or competing smart phones? Why is the digital store different? Especially in Europe, they also won't let you sell car parts that haven't been 'certified' to not compromise their safety or environmental standards. Are they planning on setting up an international body to 'certify' apps as not harmful to the operating system or other apps?

    I don't get it.
    This isn’t the same. Imagine if you had the deed to the land. And then you wanted to have a chevron station next to the circle k. You own the device (deed) because you purchased it. You should be allowed to use it in whatever way you see fit. That means if you’re ok with potential risks you can install a third party App Store. It doesn’t impact any liability on apples side. It doesn’t even increase any cost on their side. It would impact their revenue however 
    We all know the “limitations” that come from owning an iPhone. If you want a phone that you can have multiple app stores on, buy a different phone. There are tons of manufacturers that make smart phones that allow you to side load from anywhere on the internet. I don’t understand what’s so hard about that? It’s like buying a house with an HOA and then complaining the HOA won’t let you do something you know you wouldn’t be allowed to do before you bought the house  
    I am an app developer having 1 profitable app, that I am selling to non profit organisations.  These non profit organisations demand that the app nust be available to all of their members, so it must be cross platform. So I am having an iOS, an Android and a Web version.

    For me the Apple App store has a monopoly for the disttribution of the iOS version of my app, imposing the App Store guidellines to me.   I have no issiue complying with all technical and security requirements.  But the restrictions on the business level are really bothering me:  that I cannot give a discount to big customers with a lot of members, that I cannot use my secure 3rd party payment gateway I am using for the Web version,  that if the Euro USD exchange rate changes my customers are seeing price increases I cannot explain, that it can take more than 10 days to update a new version of the iOS app (it takes 15 seconds for the web version), ...

    This is what the EU decision is about.

    muthuk_vanalingamFileMakerFeller