spheric
About
- Username
- spheric
- Joined
- Visits
- 290
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 4,421
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 2,806
Reactions
-
EU antitrust chief to meet with Tim Cook to discuss fines and regulation
AllM said:avon b7 said:
GDPR is an absolutely necessary piece of legislation. A model to follow and considered one of the best stabs at protecting EU citizens in the digital age.
To many here it's the silent shield. Without it, Meta would have been deep into our underwear and way up our nooks and crannies!
It's what saved EU WhatsApp users from many of those nasty privacy changes Meta tried to slip in a while back.
No legislation is perfect and it will get revised but I'd rather have it over any alternative.The only reason Meta bought them was because WhatsApp was already the by far dominant messaging service. -
EU antitrust chief to meet with Tim Cook to discuss fines and regulation
rob53 said:I always find it interesting that the EU only brings in American companies to try and regulate.
80% of EU antitrust rulings concern European companies. -
Masimo has spent $100M in Apple Watch patent infringement fight
slurpy said:People are still gullible enough to buy this "I'm fighting for the little guy, against big baddie Apple, even if I lose everything, I'm doing it for virtue and justice!" horse-shit?
Yep, apparently people are, even on this very forum. Stunning how some of you are so easily propagandized.
Stuff like this is their bread and butter:This is NOT some patent troll going after Apple for easy money. This lawsuit is not easy money — it has already cost them $100 million, and it's unclear whether they will win.But these guys are going after Apple because they were there first, they've been doing it — and doing it well — for a LONG time.[Edit: Thanks for the correction, Tht] -
EU set to slam Apple with antitrust order over App Store practices and Spotify battle
foregoneconclusion said:spheric said:ReginaldGraziyos said:Why only music streaming? Does it have something to do with Spotify being an European company ߧবt;/div>
I'm sure they could have filed a complaint about automotive parts distribution disadvantaging third-party mechanics — but they happen to be a music streaming company, so that's what they filed a complaint about.
No. It does not. It has to do with the fact that Spotify’s complaint dealt specifically with the streaming sector.That’s simple statement of fact, and the competence or incompetence of regulatory bodies or of individuals within those bodies is rather irrelevant to that.Also, “no relevance” and “1%” of more than 100 billion revenue are contradictory. A billion Euro is rather a lot of money, when your business model isn’t working and you’re still losing the artists’ money hand over fist… -
EU set to slam Apple with antitrust order over App Store practices and Spotify battle
ReginaldGraziyos said:Why only music streaming? Does it have something to do with Spotify being an European company ߧবt;/div>
I'm sure they could have filed a complaint about automotive parts distribution disadvantaging third-party mechanics — but they happen to be a music streaming company, so that's what they filed a complaint about.