spheric

About

Username
spheric
Joined
Visits
283
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
4,217
Badges
1
Posts
2,732
  • Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs


    The governor of California is going to call Trump’s bluff by ignoring the federal tariff and negotiate directly with other countries on tariffs. Seems like a decent strategy considering that the Trump tariffs are entirely dependent on the claim that the national debt has created a national emergency that gives the president the power to levy tariffs. In other words, the White House is likely violating the law and California is going to respond in kind.
    California is part of the country. If there is a federal tariff, California is the one in violation if they try to ignore it. 
    I believe the point is: Since there is no federal tariff until Congress ratifies it, California isn't violating shit until then. 
    decoderring
  • Apple stock bloodbath continues after China applies retaliatory tariffs

    Does this mean we are now great again?
    Wait, you mean you’re „tired of all the winning“?
    londorbadmonkselleringtonxyzzy-xxxmr.scottappleempl
  • EU will force Apple to totally expose its iPhone features to all who ask

    timpetus said:
    I live in the UK and support Apple in this. They should pull out of the eurozone market, to hell with whatever financial loss that incurs. And people wonder why we voted for Brexit!?
    Right you are! I totally understood Brexit and never heard an argument against it that made any sense. 
    Apart from literally everything that has happened to Britain since Brexit — and that everybody told the Brexiteers was going to happen — there isn't much good argument to be had, I suppose. 
    tiredskills
  • The EU is betraying iPhone users and weakening privacy for political gain

    neoncat said:
    Mr. Hilliard, you're a fine writer and I enjoy your articles. But your increasing need to challenge readers with parochial arguments in the comments is a bad look (not that my opinion matters, of course.)

    I have no real skin in this game—I don't live in the EU. I tend to like more open systems than more closed, but I get the advantages Apple's approach brings, even if it also brings tremendous baggage and restrictions that deserve to be challenged. More importantly, however: Dominos have an interesting way of continuing to fall. The longer Apple digs in its heels, the less control it will have over outcomes. Which is such classic Apple behavior: Kick and scream until the terms are fully dictated and then they have zero chance to represent their viewpoint, whether on behalf of their customers or their own financial goals. They should let go of the App Store before the whole thing, bad *and* good, gets burned to the ground. 
    Nothing I said contradicts what you said here. I'm not sure what you mean by saying my posts are some kind of church gospel. As I've said on Bluesky and other places, more than one thing can be true.

    Apple digging in its heels isn't great. It's in a troublesome issue of its own making. However, the EU is overstepping by making demands it doesn't always seem to understand. Compel Apple to open up, but on its terms and timeline. Don't force hastily made changes that could be compromising to users.

    My comment was directed at the original poster's comment about envying alternative app stores, which I do not. I'm happy that regulations enabled things like emulators without much trouble, but asking Apple to destroy its business model to make way for competitors that can't keep up, now that's an issue.

    People like me that buy Apple for the closed ecosystem of products like that it's built on privacy and security first, then opened up in certain ways to allow more third-party interaction later. It's time for Apple to allow more smart watch functionality outside of Apple Watch, for example. But asking Apple to open up AirPlay and other proprietary systems is incredibly short sighted.

    What's the point of competition if the EU regulates all the competitors to operate identically. That's not user choice, that's the kind of dystopia where all the brands in the store have been removed in the name of equality. I don't want to have an Android phone, so I didn't buy one. I don't want the EU to force Apple to make iOS into Android.

    That said, regulations are helpful in pushing companies into making consumer-friendly decisions.

    See, more than one thing can be true. In this case, I think the EU is pushing too far. I'm sure some compromise will be made and consumers will ultimately benefit.
    Thank you.  I agree with what you wrote.  I think the free market does work, so if another smart watch were selling well, I suspect Apple would support it.
    The Pebble sold well. 

    Apple didn't support it. 

    The Samsung Watches are selling well. Apple doesn't support them. 
    muthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
  • Apple loses antitrust appeal in Germany, now subject to steep fines and regulations

    And furthermore, this sort of protectionist racket feeds into the sort of right wing politics that are destroying Europe and America, so the net "benefit" will be negative for everyone.
    No, framing antitrust legislation and action as a "protectionist racket" is what feeds into those politics. 

    Apple is not the "victim" here that needs to be "protected" from "overbearing government" — and that you're helping present it as such is what excites the need to destroy "overbearing government" and replace it with the "free market" tech monarchy the broligarchs are trying to sell you. 
    tiredskillsmuthuk_vanalingam