danvm

About

Username
danvm
Joined
Visits
212
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,862
Badges
0
Posts
1,507
  • Microsoft details macOS vulnerability that allowed protected data access

    wood1208 said:
    Microsoft must keep it's mouth shut when the OS vulnerability is concern. Individuals and businesses have lost so much in money,time,productivity and frustration because of Windows vulnerability exploited by many people creating and installing viruses for decades. Microsoft helped created Windows anti-virus software industry. Another burden on Windows customers to buy and keep paying upgrading.
    Based in my experience and from what I have seen, Windows 10 have been very secure, and the issues with malware are lower compared to previous versions of Windows.  At the same time, I find interesting how Craig Federighi said that "he level of Mac malware is not acceptable".  

    The level of Mac malware is not acceptable, says Apple’s Craig Federighi at Epic trial - The Verge

    And when you see the whole picture, macOS above 10% in worldwide usage.  Can you imagine what would happen if it reach the 90% of Windows?  I think it would be at the same level of Windows, maybe worse.  Who knows. 
    ctt_zhbeowulfschmidtdewme
  • Green texts in iMessages nudge teens to use iPhones

    Beats said:
    danvm said:
    roake said:
    dmorgan said:
    lkrupp said:
    SMS is SMS is SMS. Apple’s iMessages is their proprietary system and I think they are under no obligation to produce cross-platform versions of it unless they choose to, like Apple Music. Calling it anti-competitive or anti-trust is just another red herring hoisted up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes.

    Critics want Apple to be just another tech company. We all should know that by now.
    Maybe Google should stop making cross platform apps for iPhones. Imagine your iPhone without one of the many apps made available to you by Google, including Google Search. 
    I tried to imagine it… It was actually pretty easy since I have no Google apps on my phone, and do not use Google search.
    Skeptical said:
    dmorgan said:
    lkrupp said:
    SMS is SMS is SMS. Apple’s iMessages is their proprietary system and I think they are under no obligation to produce cross-platform versions of it unless they choose to, like Apple Music. Calling it anti-competitive or anti-trust is just another red herring hoisted up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes.

    Critics want Apple to be just another tech company. We all should know that by now.
    Maybe Google should stop making cross platform apps for iPhones. Imagine your iPhone without one of the many apps made available to you by Google, including Google Search. 
    Sorry mate but that is the dumbest post every. My phone has been Google free for years and I’m not missing anything. 
    If you are happy with out Google services, good for you.  Personally I only use Google Maps and sometimes Google Search.  But as today, Google dominates consumer services, far ahead compared to even Apple services. A lot of Apple customers will be affected if Google decides to stop making apps for iOS devices.  

    BTW, did you know that Apple accepts billions of dollars every year to make Google Search the default engine?  If Apple recommends Google Search for their customers, then they aren't as bad as you think, right?  And if you ask me to choose between Apple services and Google services, I'll have to choose Google services.  They are miles ahead of what Apple offers.   Maybe that's the reason most customers go with Google and MS services over Apple services, including me.  

    The fact that Apple “accepts” billions to allow Google to be the default is the opposite of Apple “recommends Google Search”. 
    No, they recommend Google Search when they made it the default search engine for Apple devices.  Don't you think it would be better if they supported a more privacy focused search engine, like DuckDuckGo instead of accepting money from Google? 


    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Green texts in iMessages nudge teens to use iPhones

    roake said:
    dmorgan said:
    lkrupp said:
    SMS is SMS is SMS. Apple’s iMessages is their proprietary system and I think they are under no obligation to produce cross-platform versions of it unless they choose to, like Apple Music. Calling it anti-competitive or anti-trust is just another red herring hoisted up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes.

    Critics want Apple to be just another tech company. We all should know that by now.
    Maybe Google should stop making cross platform apps for iPhones. Imagine your iPhone without one of the many apps made available to you by Google, including Google Search. 
    I tried to imagine it… It was actually pretty easy since I have no Google apps on my phone, and do not use Google search.
    Skeptical said:
    dmorgan said:
    lkrupp said:
    SMS is SMS is SMS. Apple’s iMessages is their proprietary system and I think they are under no obligation to produce cross-platform versions of it unless they choose to, like Apple Music. Calling it anti-competitive or anti-trust is just another red herring hoisted up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes.

    Critics want Apple to be just another tech company. We all should know that by now.
    Maybe Google should stop making cross platform apps for iPhones. Imagine your iPhone without one of the many apps made available to you by Google, including Google Search. 
    Sorry mate but that is the dumbest post every. My phone has been Google free for years and I’m not missing anything. 
    If you are happy with out Google services, good for you.  Personally I only use Google Maps and sometimes Google Search.  But as today, Google dominates consumer services, far ahead compared to even Apple services. A lot of Apple customers will be affected if Google decides to stop making apps for iOS devices.  

    BTW, did you know that Apple accepts billions of dollars every year to make Google Search the default engine?  If Apple recommends Google Search for their customers, then they aren't as bad as you think, right?  And if you ask me to choose between Apple services and Google services, I'll have to choose Google services.  They are miles ahead of what Apple offers.   Maybe that's the reason most customers go with Google and MS services over Apple services, including me.  
    ctt_zhmuthuk_vanalingamMacsWithPenguins
  • Green texts in iMessages nudge teens to use iPhones

    Beats said:
    my sister literally went “Ew, that's gross,'" said Maher.

    feel the same way and it’s a turn off also when I find a girl owns a droid. Not because they’re green but because they have a knockoff iPhone. Reminds me of people who think they’re rich wearing fake jewelry and knockoff Gucci.

    Apple isn’t obligated to give anything away for free no matter what Epic says. Though I’ve argued iMessage+FaceTime for $1/month for knockoff iPhones/knockoff iPads would have been a great idea pre-FaceTime on browsers.

    iMessage alone isn’t reason enough to switch/stick with real iPhones. Apple needs to stop playing with Apple Arcade and make some really good games with it. Games that encourage online play. Maybe add in iMessage and FaceTime support to the games. Improving Maps would help. I always supported the idea of Apple buying Yelp as it would make Maps more interesting. iCloud is too stingy with storage and TV+ has an ugly name and not much content yet.


    Well said. Apple is poised to dominate all of these. But they don’t. They just mess around, being content with dominating in phones and PCs. But they could easily dominate Google and game consoles if they actually decided to get serious. 
    You should consider that Apple is serious in gaming.  It's just that they bad at it.  Just look how they are doing with the Apple TV. 
    Apple TV Struggling, With Market Share Of Just 2% - Macworld UK
    Even MS, Nintendo and Sony are ahead of Apple as streaming devices.  What makes you think they will better than MS, Sony and Nintendo in the gaming console market?  
    ctt_zhMacsWithPenguins
  • Apple doubled its smart speaker market share in 2021 thanks to HomePod mini

    MisterKit said:
    The original HomePod was ahead of it’s time and unfortunately it was underappreciated.
    Agreed, I'm still rocking dual HPs on my home entertainment system after retiring a much more expensive 7.1 receiver & high-end speaker system. HPs are just easier, and the sound on the full-size model is quite loud. 

    But I've also purchased 3 minis for around the house, which we love. Whole-house music is like magic. 
    It looks like you sacrificed sound quality for simplicity.  In that case, I think a soundbar with a subwoofer is a better option.  It should sound better than the HomePod, specially when you have a real subwoofer, and keep the simplicity of a soundbar.  
    AI_liasentropyselijahg