rogifan_new

kkqd1337 said:

Paying extra for these watches with better materials is a really poor investment. 

tbh I can’t tell the difference between them, and no one cares either. You want a quality watch get a patek philippe.

i’ve said It over and over, they need to make the watch thinner. Most comments I get when I wear mine is that it looks chunky. 

It’s less of a poor investment now that the Watch is becoming more mature as a product and the speed/feature gains are incremental. It’s possible there is no series 5 this year. Maybe these new offerings  will be like the jet black iPhone 7. Something to keep excitement in the product when there’s no major update.

rob bonner said:

Not trying to be negative on this, really asking.  Why would anyone want this card?  The rate is pretty high, the integrations are interesting but don't really add that much value IMO, and I can use Apple Pay with my existing card.  What is the draw?

My current card is 1.5% cash back. If I get approved I’ll use the Apple Card for iTunes purchases/subscriptions, Apple Pay and iPhone upgrade program and use my existing card for everything else.

elijahg said:

So it does affect the use of the phone, as you can no longer see the battery health, despite the phone knowing that data, and it seemingly will not go into "peak performance protection" mode. Ok then.

And some how we all survived and used our smartphones just fine before this battery health stuff existed. IMO this is one of those things that just gets people all riled up yet it probably impacts a small percentage of users. But we live in the age of everyone being constantly outraged over something.

iPhone 11 Pro Max? Only Phil Schiller could come up with a silly name like that.

sflocal said:

What is a “Pro” phone?  Doesn’t make sense to me.

 One that costs more.