rogifan_new
About
- Username
- rogifan_new
- Joined
- Visits
- 90
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 5,156
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 4,297
Reactions
-
Apple to sell third-party streaming service subscriptions through 'TV' app, report says
Can someone explain to me why Apple should get a cut of someone else’s subscription revenue? I’d ask the same question of Google or Microsoft or anyone else. Apple doesn’t host the content, they don’t do marketing or promotion. And if these companies could offer their own payment system in-app they would. If the argument is they wouldn’t exist were it not for Apple’s platform then why isn’t Apple taking a cut of every Uber and Lyft transaction? -
iPhone X was world's best-selling smartphone model in first quarter
jungmark said:rogifan_new said:StrangeDays said:avon b7 said:netmage said:Well, if Apple is the second largest smartphone handset manufacturer annually (far behind Samsung and very slightly ahead of Huawei), and only made one phone, it would have the top selling model. It doesn't have just one model but it does have very few. Both Samsung and Huawei have different strategies to Apple and have far more models.
Clearly they are unlikely to have a top seller (but it isn't impossible) with so many models available.
Huawei has far more marketshare than Apple in China but has no single model in the top 5 (or top 10 IIRC).
Apple has three current high end models for sale, how many high end models do Huawei and Samsung have?
The key is to realize the many economy model phones that other companies sell are not in Apple's market and aren't competition for iPhone, so they don't split the share that matters and at which Apple thoroughly dominates both in profits and market share.
Youre worshiping at the Church of Marketshare because you’re loyal to a cheap chinese knockoff brand, and sales is all one can cheerlead... They copy their designs and don’t rule profit. What else is there to celebrate?
The difference for Apple's market share comes from having desirable "great" products rather than the cheap shogun/spaghetti approach by everyone else.
"My passion has been to build an enduring company where people were motivated to make great products," Jobs told Isaacson. "[T]he products, not the profits, were the motivation. Sculley flipped these priorities to where the goal was to make money. It's a subtle difference, but it ends up meaning everything."
-
Tim Cook debunks rumors of slow iPhone X sales
-
Amazon touts 100M Prime users as Apple quietly passes a quarter-billion paid subscriptions...
rufwork said:[That 250 mil includes this and that...] and App Store continuing payments.Oh, DED. Of course if you include every freaking HBO, Showtime, MLB, Overcast, NY Times... subscription, Apple has more than Amazon.
But those aren’t Apple’s subscriptions. They get a cut, and that’s great for my AAPL, but let’s not compare Apple’s apples to Whole Foods’ oranges.
(◔_◔)
-
Apple considers cheaper HomePod in face of lackluster sales
nunzy said:Apple will never join a race to the bottom. If anything, they will come out with a Homepod Pro.