EsquireCats
About
- Username
- EsquireCats
- Joined
- Visits
- 128
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 5,578
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,268
Reactions
-
Microsoft in talks to acquire Siri speech recognition partner Nuance for $16B
-
FBI foils one-man plot to blow up Amazon data center
-
Apple kept iMessage off Android to lock users in to iOS
Apple is a company of nearly 150,000 people. The views of one person talking about lock-in are largely irrelevant, you can probably find any talking point you want over that many people. Even if this was a view held by upper management persistently, it is not an unreasonable one, it truly is the function of a company to reasonably protect their interests.
That said the statements aren't connected and displaying them side-by-side is Epic attempting to infer something that may never have been discussed. There are plenty of reasons for the higher-ups to say that developing for Android won't yield benefits for Apple. Android compatibility issues are well known and a poor iMessage experience on Android is not going to entice people to iOS. Safari on Windows also demonstrated to Apple that cross-platform seeding activities don't necessarily do anything.
Playing the devil's advocate, even if they did say it in that context - a view about one app at one point in time doesn't mean much for how Apple chooses to run their app store. -
Apple v. Epic Games case in Australia paused as US trial looms
-
US official calls Cook's idea to vote on iPhone 'preposterous'