bells
About
- Username
- bells
- Joined
- Visits
- 46
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 393
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 140
Reactions
-
Artists claim Apple pays in goods instead of cash for Today at Apple sessions
-
Elizabeth Warren confirms Apple is on her big tech breakup list
racoleman29 said:Democrat here. She'd never get my vote...Apple hater.
Apple is not a monopoly and it build the App Store concept from the ground up. I don’t always like how it polices the store but I could switch to another phone if it mattered that much.
Google and Facebook and Amazon have different issues. They often use their monopoly status in one area to push a new product in a new area at the expense of fair competition and to the detriment of consumers.
-
Elizabeth Warren confirms Apple is on her big tech breakup list
equality72521 said:Getting bold these Lefties. -
FTC opens task force to keep tabs on competition in US tech market
avon b7 said:radarthekat said:gatorguy said:fred stein said:Note: Google takes 45% of the ad revenue on YouTube.
Like when you buy food at the movie theater consession stand, there’s both an extra cost versus the same food you could buy outside and also a prohibition on bring in and consuming food from outside while attending a movie on the theater’s property. iOS is Apple’s property. The videos you watch, via YouTube or any other source, and the apps and media you run, are all being run via calls to Apple’s API’s. This is also true for Windows, et al; the fact those other OS vendors chose not to prohibit externally sourced apps does not argue that Apple has no right to do so. It’s how they maintain a superior experience. It may not be possible to do so if they didn’t lock it down as they do. Witness Android...
You can watch the film without eating anything.
You cannot use an iDevice without iOS.
The two are intrinsically connected and this raises questions. The App Store is currently winding its way through the US system to decide if it constitutes some kind of abusive/uncompetitive system.
I believe that the EU is also reviewing different aspects of digital platforms.
I will add that it is completely legal to take your own food to the cinema in Spain and all of the cases that have been to court on this subject have come down on the side of the consumer. Cinemas still try to ban you from taking your own food hoping that you won't bother to make a formal claim. Fines against cinemas can be as high as 6,000€ when they do go to court.
The logic behind this is simple. Food and beverages are not the prime activity of the business and not allowing you the option of taking your own food allows for abusive practices as there is no competition.
If the cinema (or theatre or whatever) in question does not offer food or beverages, then you cannot take your own.
If the main activity of business is food and beverages, you cannot take your own either.
Social media is proving to be a problem for cinemas on this issue. In one well known case someone opted to take the Burger King menu into the cinema but the cinema refused to let the person in with it. He agreed to dump it but demanded a complaint form (a government form that all establishments must have). The cinema people continued to argue their case but the client just said he would file the complaint and see what the final ruling was. He proceeded to see the film.
On leaving, he was met by cinema staff offering to cover the cost of his meal but in exchange for withdrawing the formal complaint. He refused and eventually won the case and thanks to Twitter it did the rounds on social media.avon b7 said:radarthekat said:gatorguy said:fred stein said:Note: Google takes 45% of the ad revenue on YouTube.
Like when you buy food at the movie theater consession stand, there’s both an extra cost versus the same food you could buy outside and also a prohibition on bring in and consuming food from outside while attending a movie on the theater’s property. iOS is Apple’s property. The videos you watch, via YouTube or any other source, and the apps and media you run, are all being run via calls to Apple’s API’s. This is also true for Windows, et al; the fact those other OS vendors chose not to prohibit externally sourced apps does not argue that Apple has no right to do so. It’s how they maintain a superior experience. It may not be possible to do so if they didn’t lock it down as they do. Witness Android...
You can watch the film without eating anything.
You cannot use an iDevice without iOS -
FTC opens task force to keep tabs on competition in US tech market
gatorguy said:fred stein said:Note: Google takes 45% of the ad revenue on YouTube.
Not really. Apple supplies the infrastructure which includes the bandwidth and accounting. Apple supplies free development tools and resources. Developers know up front that Apple charges this amount and they elected to develop apps knowing that. Developers can develop for other platforms if they aren’t happy. Last I checked the mark up can be significant in regular retail.