MplsP
About
- Username
- MplsP
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,890
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 9,932
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 4,193
Reactions
-
Apple's ongoing modem push rumored to result in cellular MacBooks
nubus said:Did Apple remove mmWave 5G from iPad Pro 2024 to make way for this less capable modem? -
Apple's ongoing modem push rumored to result in cellular MacBooks
charlesn said:MplsP said:There is likely a small subset of users who want cellular connectivity on their laptop but the overwhelming majority of users are not willing to pay for an extra cellular line just to avoid tethering to their phone. -
Apple's ongoing modem push rumored to result in cellular MacBooks
Alex_V said:StrangeDays said:But why tho? Do that many people want to pay for an entirely different line of service, when we can just hotspot on our existing paid line? What am I missing
Out of curiosity, do any PC laptop makers have a built in cellular modem? Assuming there are no royalties involved this may be a case where the incremental cost for Apple to add their own modem to every device is trivial, essentially the production cost of the chips. -
Lawsuit complaining about Apple's free 5GB iCloud plan is dismissed
Well, Tesla used to offer free supercharging, but that was discontinued several years ago and they did it as an incentive to boost sales.
No company is obligated to offer a free service to purchasers of their products. They may do so as an incentive but to claim any sort of obligation is absurd. The fact that people have requested it is simply an indication of their desire, not any obligation on Apple's part.
Don't get me wrong. I agree that the 5GB free tier is all but useless, particularly since it's remained stagnant as device requirements have increased. During that time, server and storage costs have also decreased, so Apple is actually spending less on the free storage option than they used to. That still doesn't put them under any legal obligation. From a business perspective, increasing the free tier would likely cost Apple some amount of money because it would cannibalize sales of the lowest paid tier.
The next question, and the real question posed by the lawsuit, is whether the free tier is essentially a bait and switch. The prices are clearly posted on Apple's web site and they even have a page detailing how to reduce your storage usage so one can't argue that Apple has hidden the prices or that Apple is tricking people into using more storage. As the article stated, iCloud is not actually necessary to use an iPhone. It is clearly the most convenient option but is is not necessary so there is no legal or rational argument that iCloud much less a paid iCloud subscription is required.
@jdw - You did a nice job of posting links from people who think 5GB is too small and seem to think that's the same as making an argument that Apple should give more storage for free. If that's the case you need to work on your reasoning and rhetorical skills. Your points detailing why iCloud is preferable and provides value simply support its utility and actually make an argument justifying its cost. Also @Xed may be a 'Cupertino worshiper,' but that doesn't invalidate his argument. Attacking the person doesn't prove your point. -
iPhone 17 Slim too thin for SIM tray, may not have mmWave
jimh2 said:The post is made up of rumors and speculation being discussed as if they are known facts.