Ciprol
About
- Username
- Ciprol
- Joined
- Visits
- 24
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 220
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 53
Reactions
-
Cook discusses China investment, consumer rights, more with market regulator in Beijing
-
Apple hit with new iPhone throttling class action in California
-
Hong Kong legislator urges Tim Cook to put 'values over profits, pls!'
-
Apple's reliance on China continues to grow despite expansions in Brazil and India
hammeroftruth said:
That’s the whole rub with making things in China. It makes them affordable compared to making them here. No minimum wage, no age limits on hiring, no enforcement of preventing overworking factory workers, giving them prison like quarters to live when they aren’t working...
#Sad -
BMW says annual $80 CarPlay fee needed for ongoing testing & development
Earlier I mentioned that I chose a Merc 3 years ago partly and significantly on account of Merc's inclusion of CarPlay as its default functionality while BMW wanted to charge. With this latest news and at the recent Merc service, they even freely added a new MercedesMe feature through a complimentary OBD2 adaptor, allowing the car to communicate with a new iPhone app. Whilst I understand there's marketing data for Merc, it's still pleasant to know that new features are added to a 3 years old vehicle for free. This BMW tooth and nail pricing strategy will definitely keep me away for more time to come.
From another angle, I understand that BMW is proud of their own info display system. Back then, the BMW sales people tried to say that their system is far superior than CarPlay hence no need for CarPlay. It was very good and they obviously invested significantly into that feature. Is the present arrangement a way to force users to use and continue to justify the existence of their proprietary system? I'd say that they probably made a strategic error and is now burying their head in sand. Smartphone integration is an unavoidable development and is here to stay. Charging away is a very poor solution.