AppleExposed

About

Username
AppleExposed
Joined
Visits
233
Last Active
Roles
unconfirmed, member
Points
3,065
Badges
1
Posts
1,805

Reactions

2.6KLike0Dislike69Informative

  • Music industry pushing back against Apple Music, Apple TV+ master bundle

    AppleExposedAppleExposed
    Arcade wasn't mentioned but, since Apple owns their own TV+ content couldn't they pay record labels/artists the exact same and take a smaller cut on their own content? I believe Apple will own some Arcade content as well.
    watto_cobra

  • Steelers Ben Roethlisberger fined $5000 for wearing Apple Watch on sidelines

    AppleExposedAppleExposed
    Thought this was another stupid anti-Apple rule. Remember Beats?

    "The player is reportedly appealing against the fine, which concerns the wearing of any electronic messaging devices during play."

    So how did he violate this rule?
    lolliver

  • After Apple's iOS 13 update, Spotify adds support for Siri

    AppleExposedAppleExposed
    Let's see what they bi*** about next.

    rogifan_new said:
    Good. Now they just need to allow users to set default apps so you don’t have to say using Spotify every time you make a request. If Apple is going to be a services company then they should compete on those services. If Apple is the best users will select Apple apps/services as default. If not they’ll select something else.

    WTF? Apple is also a tech and hardware company. They should be able to do what they want with them not be governed by random forum posters.
    watto_cobra

  • Apple doubling bailout funds for iPhone screen supplier Japan Display

    AppleExposedAppleExposed
    lkrupp said:
    Apple now makes its own SOC so why not make their own screens too? Maybe I’m naive about the engineering and costs involved but relying on a company that regularly mocks you and your customers to make your OLED screens doesn’t seem like a good business decision. And it would seem that building an OLED plant in the U.S. might be more feasible because it would be mostly automated. After all, South Korea is not China in terms of its democracy and economy. It’s more like the U.S.

    Apple doesn't want to be a manufacturer but anything to cut off Sammy's revenue is welcome.
    watto_cobra

  • Compared: Apple's iPhone 11 Pro Max versus the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 and 10+

    AppleExposedAppleExposed
    badboybubby said:
    The storage size wasn't mentioned at all? Is this not an important metric?

    For $1099 the iPhone gives you 64GB while the Note gives you 256GB, big difference when you can simultaneously shoot with 4K on multiple cameras.

    As for the screen, until the iPhone 11 came about, the Note was recognized as having the A+ screen.
    Then the Galaxy S11 will come out, and it will considered the best.

    Then the Note 11 and then the iPhone 12 will be top until the next Galaxy flagship or until the iPhone comes along with its new micro led screen perhaps, who knows? It's swings and roundabouts.

    To say any of the screens or cameras on any of these phones is significantly better than the other is rubbish really, they both have strengths and weaknesses.

    Personally, I'd want more memory on an iPhone, 4GB in 2019 flagship costing up to $1499 is just being cheap. Sure, iOS does better with less ram but it also seems to struggle keeping certain apps open in the background.

    Look what happened when apple threw a big battery in their new phones, instant battery god phone, why not double the memory, it wouldn't cost much and you'd make a lot of people happier, even 6GB would have made a difference.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CusxWlCsTfQ

    Anyway, both phones are great, choose the one you want.

    Galaxy displays suck compared to iPhone because they can't utilize Apple's display tech like True Tone.
    macplusplusStrangeDays