AppleExposed
About
- Username
- AppleExposed
- Joined
- Visits
- 233
- Last Active
- Roles
- unconfirmed, member
- Points
- 3,065
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,805
Reactions
-
Apple to name 'favorite apps' of 2019 at Dec. 2 special event
-
Cortana iOS app to go dark in Australia, UK, Canada on January 31
-
Apple Watch continues to dominate the smartwatch market
gatorguy said:It's entirely possible, considering the current political climate, that the purchase won't pass vetting. Any upcoming acquisitions by Big Tech are going to get a much look by various governmental bodies before approval.
Still haven't seen an Apple Watch in public? -
A5X: How Apple took iPad to a luxury tier rivals couldn't match
javacowboy said:Retina displays are still a battery killer. -
A5X: How Apple took iPad to a luxury tier rivals couldn't match
atomic101 said:AppleExposed said:davebarnes said:We upgraded our iPads to the retina versions the day they were available.
Now, our iPads are "good enough" and we sit here with money [burning a whole in our pockets] waiting for the resolution to double again.
I don't care about: speed, camera, color.
I care about image quality.
Sorry to say but doubling the resolution would not make a difference in image quality unless you use your iPad less than 1 foot from your face
Color on the other hand IS image quality and the human brain is more sensitive to color than resolution. So an HDR iPad would be a worthy upgrade.I use my iPad Pro from a comfortable distance and can still discern pixel elements (jagged lines, fuzziness, and the screen door effect) on certain text and graphics. A resolution bump, when it becomes feasible considering cost and power constraints, would be very welcome and noticeable to me. It seems that would be the case for other people, who you seem to be quick to dismiss.
Retina tech is based on fact not opinion. You're either holding the iPad too close to your face or your unit is broken.
My color comment is also based on science and fact, not my opinion at all.