AppleExposed

lkrupp said:

Everything points to a software update or malware but my money is on a software update. That’s why I think auto-updates to system software is risky. Safari 13 appears to have some nasty bugs right now. You would think these Hollywood studios are smart enough not to apply updates on production machines until they have been tested, Avid as well as macOS. 

Mike Wuerthele said:

As a reminder, comments like "I don't see it yet" aren't helpful.

We don't publish until at least one staffer sees it on a device. As you're all aware, the rollout takes some time, and is CDN and caching-dependent.

JinTech said:

It's interesting that an OS for your TV gets multi-user support before an iPad OS 

priced4evil said:

zroger73 said:

I REALLY hope the "preview" feature can be turned off unlike Netflix.

Me too, would def be a reason to see if I can downgrade to previous ios levels

CloudTalkin said:

coolfactor said:

But, but, but.... I thought Samsung Galaxy was da best?????

What universe are we living in?

Congrats to Apple for aiming for top-quality. 

Why question yourself.  You were right.  Samsung Galaxy Note 10 was the best.  Displaymate just said so.  http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note10_ShootOut_1G.htm
Relevant excerpt:  "... Galaxy Note10+ sets or matches 13 Smartphone Display Performance Records, earning DisplayMate’s highest ever A+ grade." 
You're living in a universe where Displaymate says the Samsung Galaxy was the best... then iPhone... then Galaxy... then iPhone... then Galaxy. For a number of years Displaymate said Apple had the best LCD display, but Samsung had the best overall display.  Fast forward to Apple using Sammy panels and the Displaymate overall crown has seesawed back and forth between Apple's and Samsung's latest releases.  If history is an indicator, it's pretty much assured the crown will pass back to Samsung in the spring when they release the S11 and back to Apple in the fall when they release the 12P and 12PM.  The only mystery regarding the overall crown is whether Samsung will intro the Note before or after the iPhone.  Whichever is last to be intro'd is the one that will hold the crown until the S13... wash, rinse, repeat.

CloudTalkin said:

AppleExposed said:

nadriel said:

melgross said:

Apple claims (and they have a fair number of OLED patents), that while their screens are made by Samsung, they include Apple technology. I don’t know exactly what that means, but it’s somewhat different than Samsung’s screens they use for themselves, and presumably from those they sell to others, rather than to Apple.

I’d guess the panel is as said Samsung made but the display processor that communicates with gpu is apple made processing unit. It handles all the color, brightness etc adjustments. 

Samsung isn't involved in iPhone development. They just own plants that fulfill orders. That's it. Anyone else (LG, Japan Display, etc.) could do this if they were capable of fulfilling the large orders Apple demands. Right now only Samsungs plant can fulfill these large orders, They have absolutely nothing to do with iPhone development. Heck, they don't even develop Samsung displays, they just fulfill orders.

Apple isn't a parts manufacturer so it would be stupid for them to open a manufacturing plant just to shut up iKnockoff trolls. The screens would also be 100% identical.

Neither @nadriel ; nor @coolfactor ; were arguing that Samsung is involved in iPhone development.  No one made that argument.  It's your strawman.  And you're also wrong about LG and Japan Display being able to do it if they were capable of fulfilling large orders.  First, it's a specious argument.  "They could do it if they didn't have to do it completely.  Derp.  They can't do the 2nd most important part: Volume. So they can't do it. Second, even if they could do the volume, there's no guarantee they could deliver on the most important part: Quality.  Anecdotal evidence says that the quality part is the biggest stumbling block for both LG and JDI... well the whole thing is the problem for JDI, but that's a discussion for another time.  

litoloop said:

are the hermes watch faces what makes this apple watch version more expensive?

Folio said:

I'm curious if you can spend more for a watch yet than a phone.