Hreb

About

Username
Hreb
Joined
Visits
71
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
288
Badges
0
Posts
96
  • Apple may still demand 30% app commission, regardless of payment method

    They could try, but it would be an enormous red flag for future antitrust cases against Apple.  Antitrust law doesn't look kindly on a private company inserting itself into a transaction between partner companies and their customers.
    elijahgshareef777williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Google pokes fun at Apple's Jony Ive design videos in new headphone jack ad

    The headphone jack remains a killer feature for some and completely irrelevant for others.  I've actually been using my 12 mini with a lightning adapter for various reasons for the past week or so and it's been a huge pain.  If I had the option to upgrade to a small, modern iphone with a built in headphone jack, I'd absolutely pay up for it.
    baconstangretrogustomariowinco
  • Fitbit Charge 5 features ECG, Stress Management features in a thinner design

    If they don't fix the reliability and functional problems with notifications (at least for iOS) they can seriously forget it.  Charge2 -> Charge 4 was such a huge downgrade for me.
    watto_cobra
  • Mastercard signals end of magnetic stripe on credit cards

    Maybe they could also get rid of the embossed digits on the front.  Not optionally, but mandatory, and say ~30 years ago?
    watto_cobra
  • Expedia chairman attacks Apple's 'disgusting' 30% commission fee

    tmay said:

    Another way that Expedia makes money is through commission fees. Because Expedia always offers the lowest price (or at least a lower price than the hotel will offer), people will be far more willing to actually take a trip in the first place. So hoteliers are far more inclined to sell rooms to Expedia because some money is better than no money. The commission fees are usually between 20% and 25%.

    Where this analogy falls apart is that Expedia is actually fronting the money for those hotel rooms, paying the hotel, incurring the risk, and reselling to the customer.  This might be vaguely similar to Apple's situation were that it were pre-paying developers for apps / purchases, marking them up, and then reselling those apps / purchases to users.  Of course, that makes no sense.  Apple is providing a distribution platform, and they're entitled to a fee for providing that service.  But Apple's not just charging a fee, they're taking a sizable commission based on the value of the goods distributed on their platform, as if the cost of the service they provide scales with the value delivered on that platform.  This is a dubious model and, at 30%, it's pretty clear it would be unsustainable if there were third party app stores which were allowed to compete with Apple's for iOS users' attentions.
    muthuk_vanalingamphonephreak