Xed

About

Username
Xed
Joined
Visits
152
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
9,775
Badges
2
Posts
2,820
  • Senator Warren wades into Apple's Beeper fight with irrelevant antitrust rhetoric

    lam92103 said:
    Shes right you know. All this has just proven that there are no technological reasons to stop this. Only financial ones
    So now software security isn't a technical matter?
    MacProzeus423radarthekatForumPostigorskystompywatto_cobra
  • Apple confirms it blocked Beeper Mini citing security risks

    dewme said:
    dewme said:
    rob53 said:
    My response to Beeper is that I control who I want to message. When I see a uSPAM message in green, it's my choice whether I want to block this caller or read the message. When I see a blue message, I can be assured that this message is being secured with proper security then determine whether I want to block or respond to the sender. In other words, it's my choice not the sender's whether I want to accept the message. I don't want any government agency forcing me to accept messages or email, that's my choice not their's. I buy Apple products and choose what other products I want to install on my Apple products. I refuse to be forced to install or accept products I don't want on my devices. 
    Either I’m confused or my settings are different. When I get incoming messages from SMS or iMessage protocol in the Messages app, and whether they are safe or suspicious, they are always in a gray bubble (at least in dark mode). The only time I see green bubbles in my Messages app is when I respond to an SMS text. Is there a way to configure Messages to show colored bubbles on incoming texts?

    Regardless of bubbles, I’m very happy to see that Apple blocked what was obviously a previously undiscovered privacy & security exploit disguised as an app. It won’t be the last.
    All incoming bubbles are grey regardless if the other party is an iPhone or Android user. The blue or green bubble only appears when you send an outgoing message to that party. So any claims that the incoming bubble color allows you to filter spam is inaccurate since you won’t know if the sender is an Apple or Android user by color until after you already responded.
    Which is exactly what I thought, which is why I asked the question. I don’t know of any way for a user to screen incoming messages based on the sender’s protocol. But maybe someone knows something about this that I’ve never stumbled across. 

    Yeah I know bubble colors are a stand-in for saying which messaging system is being used for outgoing messages. 

    So it sounds like green bubble shaming is a discretionary behavior that some Apple users inflict upon people who text them with an Android phone. So it’s a douchy person problem, not a technical issue whatsoever. Being a people problem, it absolutely makes sense for Apple to resolve through technical means because Apple should be responsible for implementing a technical workaround to mask the bad manners of some of its users. Sure. 

    There is no shame in using or owning an Android phone. Have we sunk so low as a species to imply otherwise? Maybe Android phone users should look to Elon Musk to conjure up an appropriate response to those who engage in such behavior. He still has something to offer I suppose. 
    1) If the sender is using an email address it’s iMesssge. Phone numbers can be either.

    2) In the text box it says if it’s an iMessage or Text Message.

    3) The issue is more about SMS’s limitations than anything else, but Apple doesn’t help things by downconverting images and videos when they no longer need to be. There is an issue with SMS group chat consistency that affects all OSes. Hopefully RCS resolves all these issues.
    gatorguywatto_cobradewme
  • Apple confirms it blocked Beeper Mini citing security risks

    dewme said:
    rob53 said:
    My response to Beeper is that I control who I want to message. When I see a SPAM message in green, it's my choice whether I want to block this caller or read the message. When I see a blue message, I can be assured that this message is being secured with proper security then determine whether I want to block or respond to the sender. In other words, it's my choice not the sender's whether I want to accept the message. I don't want any government agency forcing me to accept messages or email, that's my choice not their's. I buy Apple products and choose what other products I want to install on my Apple products. I refuse to be forced to install or accept products I don't want on my devices. 
    Either I’m confused or my settings are different. When I get incoming messages from SMS or iMessage protocol in the Messages app, and whether they are safe or suspicious, they are always in a gray bubble (at least in dark mode). The only time I see green bubbles in my Messages app is when I respond to an SMS text. Is there a way to configure Messages to show colored bubbles on incoming texts?

    Regardless of bubbles, I’m very happy to see that Apple blocked what was obviously a previously undiscovered privacy & security exploit disguised as an app. It won’t be the last.
    Sure. You, the sender, show a green or blue bubble to yourself, and all the received messages have a grey background. When people talk of green and blue bubbles it simply refers to the message protocol/type being used for the conversation.
    danielchowwatto_cobra
  • American Express doesn't seem that interested in an Apple Card partnership

    caskey said:
    jgreg728 said:
    We're not interested in an Amex partnership either lol. Mastercard all the way.
    You understand that Mastercard isn't an issuing bank, right? It's a payment network. The Apple Card its a Mastercard currently. AMEX is both a network and an issuing bank. Even if the card continues to be a Mastercard, it will still need a bank like Chase or Wells Fargo to actually issue the card and service the accounts.
    You understand Apple is big enough it could purchase a small bank with ties to Master Card and do just fine?   They don’t need anything from anyone if they want to.  So if the relation lead to a bad user experience and softening profits, what do you think Apple could do?  Take it in house like they do with a lot of things. 
    1) No one is saying that Apple doesn’t have enough money to buy a bank.

    2) This notion that Apple is above the law with your “they don’t need anything from anyone if they want to” comment is nonsense. Finance has a lot of legal concerns and oversight.

    3) If Apple needs nothing from anyone then why didn’t they do this a long time ago? Why are they partnered with GS now and are looking for another issuing bank to partner with?
    williamlondonBart Ymuthuk_vanalingam
  • Ex-Apple lawyer guilty of insider trading gets a slap on the wrist, avoids prison

    When a failed insurrection gets lawyers off with a slap on a wrist and a pinky swear that you'll testify against someone else why expect anything from some white collar insider trading?
    Alex_Vdanoxwatto_cobrajony0