elijahg

About

Username
elijahg
Joined
Visits
247
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
4,427
Badges
2
Posts
1,966
  • Logitech discontinues Harmony universal remote lineup

    lkrupp said:
    Logitech on Friday officially killed the Harmony universal remote, leaving Apple TV users with one less alternative to the bemoaned Siri Remote.

    Bemoaned by whom? Fake techie asshats on blog forums?
    Many people here, ones that don't have their heads quite so far up Apple's ass as some.
    gregoriusmCloudTalkinmobirdnoelosglennhmuthuk_vanalingam
  • Theoretically, you can upgrade RAM & SSD on your M1 Mac mini, but you shouldn't

    sflocal said:
    tylersdad said:
    So, in essence, if you don't have the extra funds to pay for additional RAM or drive space and you want to upgrade those at a later time, you're out of luck. 

    No thanks. 
    As it has been proven and reported countless times before... 99% of all consumers will NEVER upgrade their RAM or SSD after purchase.

    Like it or not, that's where it's going.

    I bought a 2020 iMac and for three months my brand new machine was nearly unusable (would crash/reboot every 10 minutes).  With no help from Apple, I myself finally narrowed it down to bad RAM that a reseller used when I purchased additional memory at purchase. OWC swapped the RAM, machine still crashed.  I bought new memory from Crucial (128GB & $700) and works perfectly now.  Long story short, it's crap like this that was also another reason why Apple will most likely not allow RAM upgrades because of problems like this, and I fully support it.  The 3rd-party RAM suppliers will take a hit because they don't play nice at times.  OWC still hasn't fessed-up and admit there was a problem.
    You had a machine that crashes "every 10 minutes" but did not return it to Apple? You did no RAM diagnostics with the built-in diagnostics tool (D at startup)? It took you 3 months of crashing every 10 minutes (6 hours usage a day, over 90 days = 3240 crashes, yeah, bollocks) before you worked out it was RAM, commonly regarded as the most failure prone silicon in a computer?

    Anyway, aside from the fabrication above, you have proven how stupid soldered on RAM is. And if you are so anti-third party RAM, why did you not spend the $2600 on Apple RAM, since you had the choice and seemingly want to give Apple $2000 extra for $700 of RAM? Only the Apple RAM is no better than any other branded RAM, in Intel Macs it's identical to the RAM in any old PC with 2667MHz SO-DIMMS. I have cheap Amazon RAM (Samsung chips) in my 2019 iMac and it's perfect.

    Why remove the choice of third party RAM? It means only that more people will get shafted by bad Apple RAM when out of warranty. Cook's got a clever little double-dip money spinner on the soldered RAM: If yours went bad out of warranty and was soldered, not only did you pay $2600 for the RAM upgrade, you're $3000+ out of pocket because they'll charge massively for a new logic board with $2600 of RAM on. Socketed on the other hand, you could swap a single stick for ~$350 or all of it for $700, and done. Plus many RAM manufacturers guarantee it for life, so it would be a free replacement - Apple doesn't do that. Apple's RAM prices are a joke. If Apple's RAM wasn't an unbelievable 4 times the price of third party RAM I'd agree - buy RAM from Apple. But as it is, Cook is just laughing all the way to the bank. The sooner we are rid of him the better.

    TL;DR: Your third party RAM failed but you could replace it for $700, rather than the $3000 Apple would charge. Proving how absurd soldered on RAM is.
    muthuk_vanalingamGeorgeBMacdarkvader
  • Theoretically, you can upgrade RAM & SSD on your M1 Mac mini, but you shouldn't

    lkrupp said:
    tylersdad said:
    So, in essence, if you don't have the extra funds to pay for additional RAM or drive space and you want to upgrade those at a later time, you're out of luck. 

    No thanks. 
    Then you’ll be leaving the Mac platform shortly, right? Because this is the future of the Mac. 
    So, you are suggesting that because Apple chose to do this that justifies their decision?
    I miss the logic of that kind of circular logic.  
    lkrupp said:
    tylersdad said:
    lkrupp said:
    tylersdad said:
    So, in essence, if you don't have the extra funds to pay for additional RAM or drive space and you want to upgrade those at a later time, you're out of luck. 

    No thanks. 
    Then you’ll be leaving the Mac platform shortly, right? Because this is the future of the Mac. 
    I left the Mac platform in 1994. 
    Then why are you here? Makes no sense.
    Because Apple is screwing up one product doesn't mean they've screwed them all up.
    It’s a absolutely not a screwup just because you don’t understand it. Integrated components perform better and are cheaper. *
    *For Apple. If RAM fails out of warranty it's a £400 logic board, not a £20 RAM stick.

    Consumers don't see the benefit of soldered on components. Consumers have to pay Apple's massively inflated SSD/RAM prices at the time of purchase, meaning they can easily double the cost of the machine for an extra 8GB RAM (£200 at Apple, £40 on Amazon) or an extra 768GB SSD space (£400 at Apple, £90 on Amazon). This makes the sticker shock even worse, as not only does Apple skimp on RAM and SSD, people have to pay massively over the odds to get their machine to match a PC that costs 30% less. A Dell OptiPlex 3080 SFF for example has 8GB RAM, 256GB HDD and an 11th gen Core i5. It's just £515. The Mac Mini starts at £699 with the same specs, and a much cheaper (and of course faster, but the i5 is fast enough for almost anyone) M1. Oh and the Dell comes with a keyboard and mouse too. Throw in an Apple keyboard and mouse and it's £100 more. People used to be able to get the base machine for less and then upgrade when prices fell, which is all the more relevant now that CPU speeds are not advancing as they were.

    Why is the Mac Mini £200 more than the Dell? Dell charges £70 for an extra 8GB RAM. Why does Apple charge £200? Dell charges £120 for an extra 256GB SSD. Why does Apple charge £200? 5 or 6 years ago I used to do this comparison and the Mac was usually 10-15% more expensive, now it's 25-30%+. I'd defend Apple against people who said that Macs were overpriced. Now, I am sad to say I agree with those people - Macs are overpriced, especially now that Windows is nowhere near as bad as it used to be, and macOS is not as good as it used to be.

    Oh and despite what you like to claim, sockets for components rarely fail and other than RAM, are not performance bottlenecks. There are at least 20 other sockets in the machine that are just as likely to fail as the M.2 or RAM socket. There're sockets for microphones, speakers, backlights, aerials, ports, battery, trackpad, keyboard, keyboard backlight, touch bar, temperature sensors, fans, etc. So if sockets "perform better", why aren't these components soldered too? Why is it the best graphics cards run over PCIe rather than some proprietary interface if sockets are such a bottleneck?

    Finally, non-upgradable and non-repairable components are extremely wasteful. Throwing away an entire 5k display just to upgrade the CPU is utterly absurd. As things become more green, people will look upon companies for their repair policies, and Apple's green agenda looks very hollow when you look at their desperation to prevent repairs and upgrades. The UK and the EU requires parts for some appliances (white goods) to be available for 10 years for repair - this will soon hit Apple too. No more of this vintage after 5 years and obsolete after 7 crap, Apple will be required by law to keep components available for 10 years. And to top it off, no more anti-repair pentolobe or triwing screws, repairs have to be possible with commonly available tools.
    muthuk_vanalingamdarkvader
  • Theoretically, you can upgrade RAM & SSD on your M1 Mac mini, but you shouldn't

    lkrupp said:

    dk49 said:
    How can they change the RAM or Memory? Isn't it integrated in the SOC at circuit level? It's like saying you can take out four cores from the M1 to make it a quad core processor!
    Anything to get views and clicks. I just happen to know a tiny bit about this kind of surgery. The kind of equipment you need to unsolder these components is very expensive and requires extreme skill to pull it off. You just don’t pull out your 10 watt pencil iron from the local hardware store and have at it. Anyone who tries this will certainly wind up with a pile of useless junk on their hands. 
    Very tiny evidently, so much so you don't know that a hot air rework station is really all you need. A solder stencil would be very useful though.
    GeorgeBMac
  • Arm's new chip architecture will power future devices, possibly including Apple's

    cloudguy said:
    dk49 said:
    If ARM has its own AI engine now, what does it mean for Apple's Neural engine? Is it possible for Apple to completely discard ARMs AI engine in their processors or they will have to build theirs on top of ARMs? If yes then will it not break ARM's licence? 
    See above. Apple is an ARM Holdings co-founder. They have a perpetual architectural license.
    The fact that they were an ARM Holdings co-founder is no longer relevant to anything, they sold (AFAIK) all their interests in ARM long ago, and have never had a controlling stake. The perpetual architectural license was acquired when Apple bought PA Semi in 2008. NVIDIA also has an architectural license, along with MS and Qualcomm, so there's no reason they couldn't match Apple's M1 CPU speeds - except their engineers aren't good enough, apparently. So not really sure what Nvidia sees in ARM.
    tenthousandthingswatto_cobra