razorpit
About
- Banned
- Username
- razorpit
- Joined
- Visits
- 136
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,709
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,796
Reactions
-
Hewlett Packard Enterprise leaving Silicon Valley, moving to Texas
-
Hewlett Packard Enterprise leaving Silicon Valley, moving to Texas
-
Apple security chief Thomas Moyer indicted in concealed firearm permit bribery case
randominternetperson said:flippysch said:mobird said:hammeroftruth said:Lots of unanswered questions. Did he really need a CCW? If so, why didn’t corporate use their influence into getting him one, unless it wasn’t for his job and was personal.I am amused that San Jose has a “Hall of Justice” and reading that made me miss Ted Knight and his narration of the Superfriends cartoon.
Glad I live in a state that upholds the 2nd Amendment instead of trampling on it.
If it was not for the last comma, I would agree with you that the people can keep and bear arms. Unfortunately, I read it as a well-regulated Militia, such as the National Guard, shall not be infringed.
It would be like if a legislature voted this sentence into law.
Face masks, being protective from viruses, the right of businesses to deny service, shall not be infringed.
Would anyone argue that this means that face masks shall not be infringed? I doubt it.
The problem with how the 2nd Amendment was written (and with my example) is that you can't definitely tell whether the first part (about militias or masks) is supposed to be an example of why the second part exists or is supposed to be a limiting phrase.
For my example, more clear formulations (depending on the intent) would be either:
Face masks protect against viruses, this is one example that explains why we prohibit the government from infringing on the right of a business to deny service.
or
Face masks protect against viruses, thus, in this specific context, businesses shall be allowed to deny service to patrons who refuse to wear a mask.
To me, the critical word in the 2nd Amendment is "right." Everywhere else in the Constitution, we interpret "right" and "freedom" broadly in favor of the citizen. If the framers (and states ratifying the amendment) wanted this to be more restrictive, they could have phrased it without using the word "right" and certainly without the flowery "the right of the people." If they wanted to say "Congress shall pass no law interfering with the rights of States to govern their militia" they could have just said that.
Perhaps because there were a lot of lawyers present they wanted to ensure full attorney employment for the entire history of the new republic. -
Apple security chief Thomas Moyer indicted in concealed firearm permit bribery case
alanh said:tylersdad said:marsorry said:Unbelievable, happens to the best of them I suppose. Wouldn’t it have been cheaper and safer to just get a permit???
When I had mine, I paid nearly $500 (to cover the 16-hour class, range time, and the permit fees). I paid $250 every other year to renew. In WA state, I paid $50 for a 5-year permit. And unless you have a criminal record, you cannot be denied a permit.
Wow, for us Europeans it's very difficult to understand the mindset that sees carrying a concealed weapon a 'basic right'! You certainly live in a different world to us! So happy not to be in that world. -
Apple security chief Thomas Moyer indicted in concealed firearm permit bribery case
hammeroftruth said:Lots of unanswered questions. Did he really need a CCW? If so, why didn’t corporate use their influence into getting him one, unless it wasn’t for his job and was personal.I am amused that San Jose has a “Hall of Justice” and reading that made me miss Ted Knight and his narration of the Superfriends cartoon.