- michael scrip
- Last Active
soundsinamotion said:My question unfortunately would be, wasting paper is much cheaper than buying iPads for the whole production crew and cast members. While I am 100% for saving paper this just seems like an overly expensive way to waste money rather than paper.
As the article said... the production "Pretty Woman" was updating 30 pages per day... for 12 weeks (84 days)... among 50 people.
You're right... paper is cheap. But distributing 126,000 pieces of paper over 3 months is a pain in the ass. And there could be errors/delays if some people see the new pages and others don't.
But with this method... all 50 people would see the updates instantly on their iPads. And they can incorporate music and video in addition to hand-written notes.
Yes... 50 iPads aren't cheap. $329 minimum buy-in. Plus Apple Pencil. Plus AppleCare. Plus a case. You could be spending $550 per person.
That's $28,000. But at least the production company can keep using the iPads for future productions.
It might sound expensive... but so is time lost if everyone isn't on the same page due to errors and/or miscommunications.
Again... I don't think this is necessarily about saving paper... it's about having a smooth production.
The $28,000 cost of iPads isn't even that high on the list. To put it into perspective... the production "Kinky Boots" spent $150,000 on just hair and makeup. (1.1% of their $13.5 million budget)
And they spent $350,000 on just the costumes (2.5% of their $13.5 million budget)
Suddenly those iPads don't sound too bad...