clarker99
About
- Username
- clarker99
- Joined
- Visits
- 30
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,639
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 230
Reactions
-
Hands on with the Google Pixel 3a XL - performance from 2016 with a 2019 camera
avon b7 said:clarker99 said:avon b7 said:clarker99 said:As per usual folks pop up and cleary dont get that Apple doesnt need a ‘new’ mid-range device every year. Apple maintains higher prices at the premium end to prop up its amazing gray market. People fundamentally do not understand Apple’s pricing strategy. It is all about maintaining brand/price integrity. Apple’s trade in program is also about controlling the gray market prices. If Apple wants to give $250 for an iPhone 6s trade-in it sets a floor for 2nd hand iPhone value. Why sell it for less if Apple will give $250.
Meanwhile, the iOS install base continues to grow.
However, It's not what Apple wants. It's what consumers want.
The problem:
Three years of stagnant growth. Two consecutive YoY, double digit drops in iPhone shipments. Iterative upgrades. Price increases. Drop off in satisfaction at Apple Retail. Fierce competition.
The solution?:
Price adjustments
Competitive hardware
Retail improvements
Business model changes
That last point began to shape in 2017. The 'limited period' increased trade-in value from 2018 (a last-minute emergency measure) is still applicable over five months later. For 2019 I expect further changes.
The narrative that Apple doesn't know what it's doing doesn't exist. Tim Cook went on record as saying they miscalculated.
Apple took the risks but knew them
Apple is not going to lower their prices in USA or other wealthier countries. Price is not the problem. If it was, Apple would have been dead years ago.
-
Hands on with the Google Pixel 3a XL - performance from 2016 with a 2019 camera
avon b7 said:clarker99 said:As per usual folks pop up and cleary dont get that Apple doesnt need a ‘new’ mid-range device every year. Apple maintains higher prices at the premium end to prop up its amazing gray market. People fundamentally do not understand Apple’s pricing strategy. It is all about maintaining brand/price integrity. Apple’s trade in program is also about controlling the gray market prices. If Apple wants to give $250 for an iPhone 6s trade-in it sets a floor for 2nd hand iPhone value. Why sell it for less if Apple will give $250.
Meanwhile, the iOS install base continues to grow.
However, It's not what Apple wants. It's what consumers want.
The problem:
Three years of stagnant growth. Two consecutive YoY, double digit drops in iPhone shipments. Iterative upgrades. Price increases. Drop off in satisfaction at Apple Retail. Fierce competition.
The solution?:
Price adjustments
Competitive hardware
Retail improvements
Business model changes
That last point began to shape in 2017. The 'limited period' increased trade-in value from 2018 (a last-minute emergency measure) is still applicable over five months later. For 2019 I expect further changes.
-
Hands on with the Google Pixel 3a XL - performance from 2016 with a 2019 camera
As per usual folks pop up and cleary dont get that Apple doesnt need a ‘new’ mid-range device every year. Apple maintains higher prices at the premium end to prop up its amazing gray market. People fundamentally do not understand Apple’s pricing strategy. It is all about maintaining brand/price integrity. Apple’s trade in program is also about controlling the gray market prices. If Apple wants to give $250 for an iPhone 6s trade-in it sets a floor for 2nd hand iPhone value. Why sell it for less if Apple will give $250.
Meanwhile, the iOS install base continues to grow. -
Google reveals Pixel 3a and 3a XL smartphones, Nest Hub Max with added camera
-
Disney+ streaming service debuts on Nov. 12 for $6.99 a month