tshapi
About
- Username
- tshapi
- Joined
- Visits
- 67
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 371
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 380
Reactions
-
Apple's 'iPhone SE 2' rumored to ship in first half of 2018, made in India
I think the SE2 will have a 4” model and the 4.7” model
-
Mockups envision 'iPhone X Plus' and 'iPhone SE 2' with edge to edge displays, Face ID
I suspect that the 4.7 and 5.5 would be the new additions for the iPhone SE
-
Apple acknowledges iPhone X becoming unresponsive in cold weather, promises software fix
I don’t think it’s a “bug” the “touch screen” senses the heat from your fingers that’s how it works. If the weather is too cold the. Your fingers get cold too. So I suspect it has to do with this. Apple just needs to adjust something related to the sensor in the phone I would guess. Probably how heat sensitive it is if I had to guess
-
Apple AR headset codenamed 'T288' said to run new 'rOS' operating system, launch as soon a...
If will still require a phone. The watch required a nearby phone for cellular. This most likely be the same until they conquer battery issues.ihatescreennames said:
Is this actually true? Couldn’t many of the things that are shown using AR be done without a camera? Granted, on an iPhone/iPad the camera is required to see put, say, my kitchen table, on the screen. But if I was wearing glasses couldn’t the AR information just be projected onto the lens that I’m already looking through?Soli said:
2) You can't have AR without a camera, but as we saw with Google Glass a camera just makes it creepy. Can Apple overcome that stigma?
How much of what we currently view as AR relies on the camera for reasons other than showing what we can already see with our own eyes? It seems to me that the other sensors are doing most of the AR work. The camera is just there to supply an image. Right? So, couldn’t the camera potentially be eliminated while the other sensors still do their jobs in the same fashion?
-
EU presses Apple for details on latest tax arrangements in wake of Paradise Papers
It’s not “legal” it’s a back door deal. Why would anyone want to build there company in any other country If Ireland is providing a tax shelter? So the eu get compelled to kill it.foggyhill said:Even if it were true, which Apple is disputing, It's legal, so WTF is it to them.
Close up your fracked up laws and live with the consequences of that, or shut the hell up about your mock consternation. I'm not fooled by this though this grandstanding my impress the peanut gallery.
This kind of double talk were those guys (in the EU and abroad) are all amazed that tax paradise exist when most of them have all their money there is sounds pretty hollow.
This is akin to the Claude Rains character being disturbed gambling is going on in that place while collecting his winnings in the film Casablanca.
