tshapi

dougd said:

I'm not buying it. As far as I can tell they're deaf to criticism and suggestions

Apple builds a close relationship with its customer base. By building products and apps that just work. By making issues, customers find important key elements in its products. Apple doesmt need to personally respond tk every Criticism and suggestion.  The signs that it listens most of the time, show up in its products. 

ericthehalfbee said:

Of course it was. I can’t believe people are stupid enough to think that something like FaceID was added at the last minute because TouchID under the screen wasn’t ready. Or that Apple sits around to see what others do and then copies them.

I do also think that face id was intended to accompany Touch ID, but since they couldn’t get Touch ID to work to there standards under the screen they went on the PR stance that it was always intended to replace Touch ID. 

First of all, face id apparently can’t handle multiple faces atm. So retina id or Touch ID would rectify this. 

Nor can I believe that Apple would introduce a technology it couldn’t produce in volume (mom Kuo bullshit). 

I kind of believe that. They are producing it in volume. Just not the volume they traditionally would. 

mubaili said:

The notch certainly grows on me; it is changing from a ugly duckling to a delight white swan; it is daring, it is to make things difficult and different and surprise; it is not settling; it is challenging; it stirs up the placid app community; it let the best developers shine through. Less than 3 weeks to go. Can’t wait.

I think it’s more along the lines, of future parent wars. It’s hard to directly copy that with out blatant ip infringement 

tzeshan said:

Tim Cook is adopting an immature technology. 

Not true. Cook is miniaturizing already existing technologies and combining them into one seemless product.