Google is trying to win a MEANINGLESS WAR. Market share is useless if you're not earning any revenue from it.
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate due to sheer number of mobile products accessing its main search business.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
JUST IN: Microsoft to win from Google Motorola buy: Acer
Microsoft will be the winner in Google's acquisition of Motorola Mobility as the deal makes Google a direct rival to its phone-making clients, a senior executive from Acer Inc said on Friday.
Deppeler said Acer would consider the implications of the deal before deciding on future platform choices.
Acer's already thinking about DUMPING Android in favor of WP7.
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
Google's revenue from Android is so pathetically low even Google is embarrassed to include it in their earnings report.
Android costs Google alot of money: Android's acquisition cost + Motorola's acquisition cost + cost of patent litigation + cost of supporting/developing Android. Add them all up and they've invested at least $15+ Billion (or more) in Android.
Their revenue/profit from Android is only in the millions. Do the math.
Android is a LOSER. it's a money-losing operation.
Despite Android's market share, Google's PROFIT and Market Cap has been flat for the past 2 years or so. Meanwhile, Apple is now the most valuable company (with Exxon).
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate due to sheer number of mobile products accessing its main search business.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
What does Google get on Advertising? $6/year? How many new devices need to get Android for them to make up for the MMI acquit ion of $12.5 billion? How much does it cost for vendors over other licenses like WP7? How many devices have to sold with Android for Google advertisingto equal the profit from one iPhone? Who is playing the game better?
Google management lives in the "free" internet world.
Instead of inventing something own, they bought Android. They chose to use Linux instead of Unix that leaves them open for litigation. Free software is not free.
Linux is an open source project.Thousands of developers have contributed to the project and continue to contribute into it without any incentive financial or otherwise.
So yes,to burst your bubble, free software is free.Whatever you may be led to believe by your brainwashing handlers.
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate due to sheer number of mobile products accessing its main search business.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
Mmm... Based on his recent actions, one wonders if Larry Paige is "not familiar with Google's business model."
What does Google get on Advertising? $6/year? How many new devices need to get Android for them to make up for the MMI acquit ion of $12.5 billion? How much does it cost for vendors over other licenses like WP7? How many devices have to sold with Android for Google advertisingto equal the profit from one iPhone? Who is playing the game better?
Comments
Apple will win some battles but will ultimately lose the war
Google is trying to win a MEANINGLESS WAR. Market share is useless if you're not earning any revenue from it.
Source: http://global.samsungtomorrow.com/?p=5334
If you are still in denial, then you have problems.
Looks good!
Any ideas or links on price and availability?
all I could find was this:
The Samsung Galaxy Note tablet/smartphone?s launch details and pricing information haven?t been officially announced yet.
Samsung Galaxy Note Full Specifications And Price Details
And this:
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7, Galaxy Note Not Launching In The US? Ever?
Google is trying to win a MEANINGLESS WAR. Market share is useless if you're not earning any revenue from it.
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate due to sheer number of mobile products accessing its main search business.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
Microsoft will be the winner in Google's acquisition of Motorola Mobility as the deal makes Google a direct rival to its phone-making clients, a senior executive from Acer Inc said on Friday.
Deppeler said Acer would consider the implications of the deal before deciding on future platform choices.
Acer's already thinking about DUMPING Android in favor of WP7.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7814JR20110902
Here is a video of a caricature artist using the device at IFA 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMvMW...3&feature=plpp
How is that different than people painting on iPad with fingers?
How is that different than people painting on iPad with fingers?
Pressure sensitivity and detail.
Pressure sensitivity and detail.
That's all?
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
Google's revenue from Android is so pathetically low even Google is embarrassed to include it in their earnings report.
Android costs Google alot of money: Android's acquisition cost + Motorola's acquisition cost + cost of patent litigation + cost of supporting/developing Android. Add them all up and they've invested at least $15+ Billion (or more) in Android.
Their revenue/profit from Android is only in the millions. Do the math.
Android is a LOSER. it's a money-losing operation.
Despite Android's market share, Google's PROFIT and Market Cap has been flat for the past 2 years or so. Meanwhile, Apple is now the most valuable company (with Exxon).
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate due to sheer number of mobile products accessing its main search business.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
What does Google get on Advertising? $6/year? How many new devices need to get Android for them to make up for the MMI acquit ion of $12.5 billion? How much does it cost for vendors over other licenses like WP7? How many devices have to sold with Android for Google advertisingto equal the profit from one iPhone? Who is playing the game better?
That's all?
What else do you need it to do? It won't make you a cup of coffee.
What else do you need it to do? It won't make you a cup of coffee.
Yawn.
Google management lives in the "free" internet world.
Instead of inventing something own, they bought Android. They chose to use Linux instead of Unix that leaves them open for litigation. Free software is not free.
Linux is an open source project.Thousands of developers have contributed to the project and continue to contribute into it without any incentive financial or otherwise.
So yes,to burst your bubble, free software is free.Whatever you may be led to believe by your brainwashing handlers.
I guess your not familiar with Google's business model.
Google's main source of revenue is advertising.
The more Android devices that are out there (aka more market share), the increase revenue they will generate due to sheer number of mobile products accessing its main search business.
Market share is the key to Google's business model.
Mmm... Based on his recent actions, one wonders if Larry Paige is "not familiar with Google's business model."
Mmm... Based on his recent actions, one wonders if Larry Paige is "not familiar with Google's business model."
Larry Page's tenure as Google's CEO is going to be a short one.
WSJ: A Very Gloomy Picture Of Larry Page's Short Tenure As Google CEO
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...984562128.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/a-ver...gle-ceo-2011-8
What does Google get on Advertising? $6/year? How many new devices need to get Android for them to make up for the MMI acquit ion of $12.5 billion? How much does it cost for vendors over other licenses like WP7? How many devices have to sold with Android for Google advertisingto equal the profit from one iPhone? Who is playing the game better?
Google.
That's all?
Take a look at the infographic that I posted.
Also, what is even better is that Samsung will be releasing an SDK for the S Pen software for third party developers to take advantage of it.
Yawn.
I don't care about how your uvula looks. How about answering my question?
I don't care about how your uvula looks. How about answering my question?
He doesnt have an answer that is why he uses onomatopoeia in its place. He should be a great politician.
Google.
glad you admitted defeat.