...since you are not mindlessly condemning Samsung/praising apple welcome to ridicule. I agree with you its silly to make an equivication to the newton and the note but then state its not taking in account the same argument with the Prada and the iPhone.
I like to consider if one subscribes to a form of ideology to make an arguement no matter how we redicules, they must be willing to accept when that exact form is used against them.
Only because they couldn't get decent battery life otherwise. And don't forget the shitty screens on those big phones.
Making things a different size isn't terribly innovative, most of the time.
Oh, and they still have those shitty screens, remember.
Please tell me how the current Samsung screens are shitty. Have you used one for more then ten seconds at a best buy when you were searching for fualts with it
How about a little research before accusing someone of copying samsungs been using the Plus moniker for there larger versions of there device for years.
So bassically apple copied samsung here and samsung continues there trend that they have done for the last 4 years.
...since you are not mindlessly condemning Samsung/praising apple welcome to ridicule. I agree with you its silly to make an equivication to the newton and the note but then state its not taking in account the same argument with the Prada and the iPhone.
Well, the Newton proved that having a stylus isn't that innovative some idiots think it is. Apple had it since before Steve arrived. What exactly did LG Prada prove about iPhone?
The Galaxy Note series has been out for years, well before the iPhone 6+ I might add. What exactly is Samsung "copying" here? Putting the word "Plus" in the name?
(assuming this rumor is even true, which I kind of doubt — the Galaxy Note has too much name recognition to just dump like that)
If Samsung were to use the word 'plus' as part of the naming of a future phone, they would of course have to be copying Apple, as no way would Samsung ever have thought to use the word 'plus' unless Apple pioneered such an incredibly innovative naming convention.
Well, the Newton proved that having a stylus isn't that innovative some idiots think it is. Apple had it since before Steve arrived. What exactly did LG Prada prove about iPhone?
That the capacitive touch screen was not that innovative. I am basically showing how throwing the Prada out is the same thing as throwing the Newton out.
Its 2015 who cares who came first both sides are guilty of borrowing from the competition. At this point I care more of what the next great product is rather then who copied who.
That the capacitive touch screen was not that innovative.
Capacitive touchscreen? LOL. Tell that to normal people on the street, what do you think you would get?
You are so reaching. If iPhone was only innovative because of touchscreen Google wouldn't scrap everything to copy it. No. The point stands. Anyone can make a phone with a stylus or a touch screen. Innovation is way more than that.
Comments
...since you are not mindlessly condemning Samsung/praising apple welcome to ridicule. I agree with you its silly to make an equivication to the newton and the note but then state its not taking in account the same argument with the Prada and the iPhone.
I like to consider if one subscribes to a form of ideology to make an arguement no matter how we redicules, they must be willing to accept when that exact form is used against them.
The Note Edge had the curve edge. So the next Note 5 should be similar to the Edge with 2 curve edges.
Please tell me how the current Samsung screens are shitty. Have you used one for more then ten seconds at a best buy when you were searching for fualts with it
How about a little research before accusing someone of copying samsungs been using the Plus moniker for there larger versions of there device for years.
So bassically apple copied samsung here and samsung continues there trend that they have done for the last 4 years.
Buzz off.
You're being too polite.
I love the Beard
http://www.loopinsight.com/2015/06/02/samsungs-new-ad-what-the-****
I wonder how many seizures this will cause?
I got a Caesar out of it ... it hurt my ears and gave me a stabbing back pain ...
I didnt see that coming...
It looks like Samsung still cant get why the majority of the people that buy flagship phones, prefer Apple...
Either quit putting the salad fork in your ear... or get up from the slot machine, walk around and stretch. :smokey:
EX) Galaxy s2 Plus, Galaxy tab 7.0 Plus
Samsung....... just release the Note 5 and call it a day. No need for this and no need to ruin already pretty successful Note line.
I didnt see that coming...
It looks like Samsung still cant get why the majority of the people that buy flagship phones, prefer Apple...
What the hell is so great about Apple? Samsung galaxy 6 Edge is a flagship phone.
LG Prada? LOL. Welcome to 2007 troll argument.
Then why it didn't sell that well? And if Apple's not great, then why are you here?
Well, the Newton proved that having a stylus isn't that innovative some idiots think it is. Apple had it since before Steve arrived. What exactly did LG Prada prove about iPhone?
The Galaxy Note series has been out for years, well before the iPhone 6+ I might add. What exactly is Samsung "copying" here? Putting the word "Plus" in the name?
(assuming this rumor is even true, which I kind of doubt — the Galaxy Note has too much name recognition to just dump like that)
If Samsung were to use the word 'plus' as part of the naming of a future phone, they would of course have to be copying Apple, as no way would Samsung ever have thought to use the word 'plus' unless Apple pioneered such an incredibly innovative naming convention.
Samsung I9001 Galaxy S Plus
Also known as Samsung Galaxy S 2011 Edition
Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus
Samsung N150 Plus Review
Samsung Galaxy S II Plus Review
Posted: 16 Apr 2013
In war, truth is the first casualty. - Aeschylus
That the capacitive touch screen was not that innovative. I am basically showing how throwing the Prada out is the same thing as throwing the Newton out.
Its 2015 who cares who came first both sides are guilty of borrowing from the competition. At this point I care more of what the next great product is rather then who copied who.
Capacitive touchscreen? LOL. Tell that to normal people on the street, what do you think you would get?
You are so reaching. If iPhone was only innovative because of touchscreen Google wouldn't scrap everything to copy it. No. The point stands. Anyone can make a phone with a stylus or a touch screen. Innovation is way more than that.