Apple TV sales surge with hardware refresh, but still rank 4th in US streaming device market
A new survey of U.S. broadband households recently purchased a streaming media player has found that Roku continues to own the largest market share, while the Apple TV sales have greatly increased since last year's update. However, no one device controls a majority of the market, leaving the race for a winner still wide open.
New data from Parks Associates published on Tuesday has estimated HDTV streaming video players sold from the first quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2016. The firm's findings show Roku in the lead with 30 percent of total sales over the one-year period.
Apple TV, which was updated last fall to a new model with a dedicated App Store, came in fourth with 20 percent of sales. Finishing ahead of it were Google and Amazon, both with 22 percent.
One factor in Apple's fourth-place finish was price: About half of streaming devices sold in 2015 were low-cost "sticks" that offer basic streaming and app functionality, like Google Chromecast or Amazon Fire TV Stick. Park Associates found that three-quarters of Amazon's sales and one-third of Roku's were streaming sticks.
However, Apple saw a big boost in marketshare thanks to the launch of the fourth-generation Apple TV with Siri remote. Of the four largest manufacturers, Apple saw the greatest unit sales increase year over year, and its share of sales in 2015 was 50 percent higher than in 2014.
A year prior, Roku had a 34 percent share of sales, Chromecast was at 23 percent, Amazon Fire TV was 16 percent, and Apple TV accounted for 13 percent.
Apple continues to sell the third-generation Apple TV, which lacks the Siri remote and App Store, for $69, in a bid to fend off low-cost options like the Chromecast. But the fourth-generation Apple TV has a starting price of $149 for 32 gigabytes of capacity, bumping up to $199 for 64 gigabytes, putting it in a price category much higher than most of its competitors.
In contrast, the Amazon Fire TV stick is priced at $39.99 with a standard remote, or $49.99 with Voice Remote. And Roku's most expensive fourth-generation model, which is capable of streaming 4K video content, costs $119.99.
New data from Parks Associates published on Tuesday has estimated HDTV streaming video players sold from the first quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2016. The firm's findings show Roku in the lead with 30 percent of total sales over the one-year period.
Apple TV, which was updated last fall to a new model with a dedicated App Store, came in fourth with 20 percent of sales. Finishing ahead of it were Google and Amazon, both with 22 percent.
One factor in Apple's fourth-place finish was price: About half of streaming devices sold in 2015 were low-cost "sticks" that offer basic streaming and app functionality, like Google Chromecast or Amazon Fire TV Stick. Park Associates found that three-quarters of Amazon's sales and one-third of Roku's were streaming sticks.
However, Apple saw a big boost in marketshare thanks to the launch of the fourth-generation Apple TV with Siri remote. Of the four largest manufacturers, Apple saw the greatest unit sales increase year over year, and its share of sales in 2015 was 50 percent higher than in 2014.
A year prior, Roku had a 34 percent share of sales, Chromecast was at 23 percent, Amazon Fire TV was 16 percent, and Apple TV accounted for 13 percent.
Apple continues to sell the third-generation Apple TV, which lacks the Siri remote and App Store, for $69, in a bid to fend off low-cost options like the Chromecast. But the fourth-generation Apple TV has a starting price of $149 for 32 gigabytes of capacity, bumping up to $199 for 64 gigabytes, putting it in a price category much higher than most of its competitors.
In contrast, the Amazon Fire TV stick is priced at $39.99 with a standard remote, or $49.99 with Voice Remote. And Roku's most expensive fourth-generation model, which is capable of streaming 4K video content, costs $119.99.
Comments
"Apple TV Remote" (no Siri)
Apple need to be far more aggressive with this product. It should be €99 and Apple should put a 8 or 10-person team in charge of designing a really nice first-party gaming controller and offer it as an optional add-on at checkout and get rid of the requirement of real games to need to implement that remote as a shitty gaming controller. There can always be novelty games that use it as a controller, but they need to build themselves an official Apple Gaming Controller to convey they take Apple TV seriously and understand gaming.
Look at the way iPad is going. 32 (the good enough) > 128 (the up-sell) > 256 (the crazy nerd)
Last gen's A8 chip.
No tech from the Kinect team.
Siri Remote missing half of Apple's hardware:
Taptic Engine
3D Touch
M Processor(fitness apps!)
and more I can't remember at the moment.
It's funny how Apple is suddenly a budget brand when Apple TV is brought up, people say this tech would be "too expensive" but when has Apple held back on tech and price?
You're also asking for optional
Apple gaming controller but at $99
whats the point? To control crappy endless runners? Flappy bird?
People are paying $400+ for XBox One's for the same reasons they buy Apple TV's. I really want Apple TV to be a tank in the industry.
With smart TVs, cheap streaming sticks and PS 4.5 and Nintendo NX coming soon they'll be less and less reason to own an Apple TV.
However, I've always wondered why is the new one so fat? What is it inside that makes it so fat? Is it just because of the newer, more powerful chip? iPhones also have powerful chips and they're pretty slim.
Are you calling me a crazy nerd?
My current iPad is 128, but I plan on getting 256 next time I upgrade for sure. I wouldn't be surprised if we saw 512 iPads in a year or so.
Off topic, if anyone ever gets an iPhone delivered to the door, make sure you open it with the delivery driver present before signing for it. I signed for an empty iPhone 6 cardboard box this week!