Trump is leaving a trail of economic tech destruction in his wake but all the damage is to his favoured tech companies.
AT&T has been left with basically two options for 5G (Nokia or Ericsson). Vodafone specialists have gone on record as putting Ericsson far ahead of Nokia in terms of ability to satisfy their needs. The same people say Huawei is far ahead of both of them.
The Vodafone conclusion was that by eliminating Huawei as an option, the new option was really Ericsson or Ericsson. That is catastrophic for competition and was sure to lead to lesser but more expensive equipment (the cost of which is passed on to the consumer of course).
Huawei is already successfully cutting ties with U.S companies. Latest figures confirm thay over 10 billion dollars in component supply has gone to Japan. That is a massive loss fora almost 300 U.S companies (all of which have requested exemption licences from the commerce department).
Huawei claims that 40,000 U.S jobs are tied to its U.S supply chain. That is getting decimated.
In terms of tech influence, the winds are now blowing east. In a recent CNBC interview, Ren claimed that many products were in development for years but held back. When Trump began his cowboy politics, he released some of them. That's why such big announcements and roll outs came so quickly (Ascend, Kun Peng, Tai Shan, Atlas, HarmonyOS). Apparently there are more and may even include a completely new chipset/instruction set to cover problems with ARM.
Now Huawei is slowly cristalising its message to Trump and he won't like it because it has the potential to turn the tech industry on its head in terms of influence.
One thing is for sure, someone somewhere must have advised him things could backfire in a massive way. He may not be president for long enough to answer to the damage he is doing to U.S tech companies but the message from Huawei really couldn't be any clearer. For me, competition is the only thing that matters so having a third platform to choose from can only be a good thing.
Huawei might be doing well in China, but China's human rights issues are beginning to be linked to trade in the U.S., by Europeans, and by Western Allies.
China's economy, has peaked, growth is slowing, and even China's population is expected to peak by 2025. Throw in the problems with China's United Front influence campaigns in various Western countries, and the pattern of China attempting to drive its brand of Authoritarianism into the rest of the world becomes apparent, and the West is beginning to resist this.
Huawei's close links to China's Government, which you deny, will drive Western countries to also enhance competing Telecom technology, aka, Ericsson, Nokia, and Samsung, with massive investments as these companies marketshare grow.
and of course, a response by the U.S. to the German Economics Ministry;
"China is Germany's biggest trading partner. Yet German intelligence officials have also advised Mrs Merkel's government to bar Huawei from Germany's 5G roll-out.
Ambassador Grenell said equating US government action with that of the Chinese Communist Party was "an insult to the thousands of American troops who help ensure Germany's security and the millions of Americans committed to a strong Western alliance".
"These claims are likewise an insult to the millions of Chinese citizens denied basic freedoms and unjustly imprisoned by the CCP," he added"
Huawei's attempt to end run around Android OS and Western Services likely isn't going to play well outside of China. There's already too many questions about China origin services controlling content and data on users in the West, and both of the competing mobile OS's are currently fully formed and well developed.
Huawei's early lead and advantage in 5G, that you argue, isn't going to last as the West invests in Huawei alternatives.
It's China's fault, ultimately, that they can't deliver a fair trade deal with the U.S, nor restrain their Authoritarian expansion.
Huawei isn't China.
Huawei is still investing than Nokia and Ericsson in 5G.
Shipping products are not comparable to what Huawei is offering. That won't change any time soon.
Trump is leaving a trail of economic tech destruction in his wake but all the damage is to his favoured tech companies.
AT&T has been left with basically two options for 5G (Nokia or Ericsson). Vodafone specialists have gone on record as putting Ericsson far ahead of Nokia in terms of ability to satisfy their needs. The same people say Huawei is far ahead of both of them.
The Vodafone conclusion was that by eliminating Huawei as an option, the new option was really Ericsson or Ericsson. That is catastrophic for competition and was sure to lead to lesser but more expensive equipment (the cost of which is passed on to the consumer of course).
Huawei is already successfully cutting ties with U.S companies. Latest figures confirm thay over 10 billion dollars in component supply has gone to Japan. That is a massive loss fora almost 300 U.S companies (all of which have requested exemption licences from the commerce department).
Huawei claims that 40,000 U.S jobs are tied to its U.S supply chain. That is getting decimated.
In terms of tech influence, the winds are now blowing east. In a recent CNBC interview, Ren claimed that many products were in development for years but held back. When Trump began his cowboy politics, he released some of them. That's why such big announcements and roll outs came so quickly (Ascend, Kun Peng, Tai Shan, Atlas, HarmonyOS). Apparently there are more and may even include a completely new chipset/instruction set to cover problems with ARM.
Now Huawei is slowly cristalising its message to Trump and he won't like it because it has the potential to turn the tech industry on its head in terms of influence.
One thing is for sure, someone somewhere must have advised him things could backfire in a massive way. He may not be president for long enough to answer to the damage he is doing to U.S tech companies but the message from Huawei really couldn't be any clearer. For me, competition is the only thing that matters so having a third platform to choose from can only be a good thing.
Huawei might be doing well in China, but China's human rights issues are beginning to be linked to trade in the U.S., by Europeans, and by Western Allies.
China's economy, has peaked, growth is slowing, and even China's population is expected to peak by 2025. Throw in the problems with China's United Front influence campaigns in various Western countries, and the pattern of China attempting to drive its brand of Authoritarianism into the rest of the world becomes apparent, and the West is beginning to resist this.
Huawei's close links to China's Government, which you deny, will drive Western countries to also enhance competing Telecom technology, aka, Ericsson, Nokia, and Samsung, with massive investments as these companies marketshare grow.
and of course, a response by the U.S. to the German Economics Ministry;
"China is Germany's biggest trading partner. Yet German intelligence officials have also advised Mrs Merkel's government to bar Huawei from Germany's 5G roll-out.
Ambassador Grenell said equating US government action with that of the Chinese Communist Party was "an insult to the thousands of American troops who help ensure Germany's security and the millions of Americans committed to a strong Western alliance".
"These claims are likewise an insult to the millions of Chinese citizens denied basic freedoms and unjustly imprisoned by the CCP," he added"
Huawei's attempt to end run around Android OS and Western Services likely isn't going to play well outside of China. There's already too many questions about China origin services controlling content and data on users in the West, and both of the competing mobile OS's are currently fully formed and well developed.
Huawei's early lead and advantage in 5G, that you argue, isn't going to last as the West invests in Huawei alternatives.
It's China's fault, ultimately, that they can't deliver a fair trade deal with the U.S, nor restrain their Authoritarian expansion.
Huawei isn't China.
Huawei is still investing than Nokia and Ericsson in 5G.
Shipping products are not comparable to what Huawei is offering. That won't change any time soon.
Trump is leaving a trail of economic tech destruction in his wake but all the damage is to his favoured tech companies.
AT&T has been left with basically two options for 5G (Nokia or Ericsson). Vodafone specialists have gone on record as putting Ericsson far ahead of Nokia in terms of ability to satisfy their needs. The same people say Huawei is far ahead of both of them.
The Vodafone conclusion was that by eliminating Huawei as an option, the new option was really Ericsson or Ericsson. That is catastrophic for competition and was sure to lead to lesser but more expensive equipment (the cost of which is passed on to the consumer of course).
Huawei is already successfully cutting ties with U.S companies. Latest figures confirm thay over 10 billion dollars in component supply has gone to Japan. That is a massive loss fora almost 300 U.S companies (all of which have requested exemption licences from the commerce department).
Huawei claims that 40,000 U.S jobs are tied to its U.S supply chain. That is getting decimated.
In terms of tech influence, the winds are now blowing east. In a recent CNBC interview, Ren claimed that many products were in development for years but held back. When Trump began his cowboy politics, he released some of them. That's why such big announcements and roll outs came so quickly (Ascend, Kun Peng, Tai Shan, Atlas, HarmonyOS). Apparently there are more and may even include a completely new chipset/instruction set to cover problems with ARM.
Now Huawei is slowly cristalising its message to Trump and he won't like it because it has the potential to turn the tech industry on its head in terms of influence.
One thing is for sure, someone somewhere must have advised him things could backfire in a massive way. He may not be president for long enough to answer to the damage he is doing to U.S tech companies but the message from Huawei really couldn't be any clearer. For me, competition is the only thing that matters so having a third platform to choose from can only be a good thing.
Huawei might be doing well in China, but China's human rights issues are beginning to be linked to trade in the U.S., by Europeans, and by Western Allies.
China's economy, has peaked, growth is slowing, and even China's population is expected to peak by 2025. Throw in the problems with China's United Front influence campaigns in various Western countries, and the pattern of China attempting to drive its brand of Authoritarianism into the rest of the world becomes apparent, and the West is beginning to resist this.
Huawei's close links to China's Government, which you deny, will drive Western countries to also enhance competing Telecom technology, aka, Ericsson, Nokia, and Samsung, with massive investments as these companies marketshare grow.
and of course, a response by the U.S. to the German Economics Ministry;
"China is Germany's biggest trading partner. Yet German intelligence officials have also advised Mrs Merkel's government to bar Huawei from Germany's 5G roll-out.
Ambassador Grenell said equating US government action with that of the Chinese Communist Party was "an insult to the thousands of American troops who help ensure Germany's security and the millions of Americans committed to a strong Western alliance".
"These claims are likewise an insult to the millions of Chinese citizens denied basic freedoms and unjustly imprisoned by the CCP," he added"
Huawei's attempt to end run around Android OS and Western Services likely isn't going to play well outside of China. There's already too many questions about China origin services controlling content and data on users in the West, and both of the competing mobile OS's are currently fully formed and well developed.
Huawei's early lead and advantage in 5G, that you argue, isn't going to last as the West invests in Huawei alternatives.
It's China's fault, ultimately, that they can't deliver a fair trade deal with the U.S, nor restrain their Authoritarian expansion.
Huawei isn't China.
Huawei is still investing than Nokia and Ericsson in 5G.
Shipping products are not comparable to what Huawei is offering. That won't change any time soon.
Huawei is ahead, way ahead, in areas that matter most to carriers. The number one factor for carriers is energy consumption. Then rents, installation costs, maintenance costs etc. All areas that are of supreme long term importance to carriers.
Then there are the technical aspects of that small, lightweight, energy efficient easy-to-install equipment.
Comments
Huawei is still investing than Nokia and Ericsson in 5G.
Shipping products are not comparable to what Huawei is offering. That won't change any time soon.
https://telecoms.com/500982/nokia-celebrates-50th-5g-deal-win-but-it-still-lags-ericsson-and-huawei/
Huawei isn't dominating by any stretch of the imagination.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/25/vodafone-ceo-defends-competition-from-huawei-at-mwc-2019.html
Huawei is ahead, way ahead, in areas that matter most to carriers. The number one factor for carriers is energy consumption. Then rents, installation costs, maintenance costs etc. All areas that are of supreme long term importance to carriers.
Then there are the technical aspects of that small, lightweight, energy efficient easy-to-install equipment.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-tech-europe/huawei-unveils-new-5g-antennae-ahead-of-china-ramp-idUSKBN1WV1LS
Without touching on other (non 5G) advances that are equally necessary such as battery advances, cloud infrastructure, servers, AI etc.
The 'all scenario' approach gives Huawei a major advantage in being able to offer carriers absolutely the whole shebang and then some! ...
And phones of course!
That's why Huawei is already operating a complete 5G solution at 30 Chinese hospitals with thousands more projected.
https://www.mobileworldlive.com/huawei-updates/china-releases-5g-hospital-network-standard/
And you think I'm dreaming!