Rumor: Digg founder claims 3G iPhone to do video chat
Digg founder Kevin Rose, whose first-generation iPhone rumors fell short of their mark last Spring, is citing different sources this year in predicting that the 3G version of the handset will boast video chat capabilities.
During a 90 second segment of his weekly Podcast show "Diggnation" this past Friday, Rose told viewers that Apple may be restricting third parties from authoring applications that run in both the foreground and background partly because it doesn't want a competitor to its own mobile iChat application that will do just that.
More specifically, he claims that a 3G version of the iPhone hardware due in a few months will employ two digital cameras situated back-to-back -- one on the front side of the unit behind the transparent touch-screen, and a second one on the back of the handset as it exists today.
Combined with the mobile iChat application, the front-mounted cam will pave the way for live video conferencing over AT&T's high-speed 3G wireless network with computer-based iChat users, as well as other second-generation iPhone owners, according to Rose.
In the week's leading up to last year's iPhone introduction, the Digg founder cited sources in saying Apple would introduce the handset with a slide-out keyboard, two separate battery compartments, and make it available for both CDMA and GSM networks -- all of which turned out to be false.
Despite those misses, Rose has made some accurate predictions in the past, most notably his last minute reports of an iPod nano ahead of the player's inaugural release in 2005.
During a 90 second segment of his weekly Podcast show "Diggnation" this past Friday, Rose told viewers that Apple may be restricting third parties from authoring applications that run in both the foreground and background partly because it doesn't want a competitor to its own mobile iChat application that will do just that.
More specifically, he claims that a 3G version of the iPhone hardware due in a few months will employ two digital cameras situated back-to-back -- one on the front side of the unit behind the transparent touch-screen, and a second one on the back of the handset as it exists today.
Combined with the mobile iChat application, the front-mounted cam will pave the way for live video conferencing over AT&T's high-speed 3G wireless network with computer-based iChat users, as well as other second-generation iPhone owners, according to Rose.
In the week's leading up to last year's iPhone introduction, the Digg founder cited sources in saying Apple would introduce the handset with a slide-out keyboard, two separate battery compartments, and make it available for both CDMA and GSM networks -- all of which turned out to be false.
Despite those misses, Rose has made some accurate predictions in the past, most notably his last minute reports of an iPod nano ahead of the player's inaugural release in 2005.
Comments
No doubt about it, Kevin Rose has stirred up a hornet's nest. He'll be condemned as a liar and an idiot. That's the price you pay for making off-the-wall statements based on probably somebody having a happy dream.
Likewise, video chat is not a rarity at all. It's not commonly used in many places due to high data charges, but the feature is already supported on most/all 3G phones.
If anything, perhaps this tells us that his 'sources' are mostly just educated guesses based on industry trends or just his wish-list.
That said, one unique detail is that the front-facing camera is supposed to be behind the 'transparent' touchscreen. Again, could just be culled from the old Apple patent filing. But it's really interesting nonetheless.
I don't care if it's just wishful thinking on his part or just to get more hits on his site or whatever. To me, it sounds like a great idea to have a videoconferencing iPhone for social and business interaction. The only problem now that the hype has started, if the 2-camera model doesn't get announced, then there's going to be a major letdown.
No doubt about it, Kevin Rose has stirred up a hornet's nest. He'll be condemned as a liar and an idiot. That's the price you pay for making off-the-wall statements based on probably somebody having a happy dream.
Yeah, the two-way camera idea would be a great feature, but so far that's the only thing he's said that even comes close to how Apple actually likes to design their products. A slide-out keyboard? Who does he think he's kidding? Has he been drinking John Dvorak's Kool-Aid?
Let me be the first here to engage in such condemnation: I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and not call him a liar, but that means then that if he really does believe what he's spewing, then he really IS an idiot.
Oh, and Digg? Get real. I'm amazed that people waste so much time there... all it is is a bunch of whining and griping about everything that people think is wrong with the world. Has anything truly productive and useful ever come out of Digg? Not that I've ever seen.
I don't think back-to-back cameras will take up any more power. Either one or the other will be on when it's appropriate application is required. In fact, it may be useful to be able to switch cameras during a video iChat, if you want to show someone something you're looking at.
This was really the only hardware limitation I saw when the camera was announced, and will be a logical upgrade for V2, especially at 3G speeds.
I don't know how much to believe this specific guy, but I hope he's right.
http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/03...om-kevin-rose/
The digg guys are tools, I wouldn't listen to a word he has to say.
Likewise, video chat is not a rarity at all. It's not commonly used in many places due to high data charges, but the feature is already supported on most/all 3G phones.
That's not why. It is not used because it is inconvenient while bringing no additional benefits. There's frankly no reason to make a video call over an audio-only, especially not while walking.
/Adrian
Two cameras on the phone has been a standard feature on 3G phones in the UK/Europe for several years. Probably even longer than that in Asian countries. Why are people making such a song and dance about this?
Thank you, thank you, thank you. So much truth and wisdom in only a few lines of text.
That's not why. It is not used because it is inconvenient while bringing no additional benefits. There's frankly no reason to make a video call over an audio-only, especially not while walking.
/Adrian
After spending so much money on the licences and infrastructure, I think the carriers really wish it weren't so!
Perhaps one way to get around it is through wifi instead of cellular networks. But if it gets too popular I should think that public hotspot operators would get pissed.
Anyhow, just looking at the examples of the current iPhone not supporting video-recording or 3G, I think Apple's very much waiting till they can get it right, and only if the feature gives great value. Same for video-conferencing I guess
Oh, and Digg? Get real. I'm amazed that people waste so much time there... all it is is a bunch of whining and griping about everything that people think is wrong with the world. Has anything truly productive and useful ever come out of Digg? Not that I've ever seen.
I agree.
So what is Digg? a place where there are threads about threads?
Whats wrong with the original tread? can I not talk about it there?
One of the most useless web items ever imho.
Can you Digg on a Digg? if not whats the point?
After spending so much money on the licences and infrastructure, I think the carriers really wish it weren't so!
Perhaps one way to get around it is through wifi instead of cellular networks. But if it gets too popular I should think that public hotspot operators would get pissed.
Anyhow, just looking at the examples of the current iPhone not supporting video-recording or 3G, I think Apple's very much waiting till they can get it right, and only if the feature gives great value. Same for video-conferencing I guess
I think Wi-FI video iChat would be the only way it would be allowed, just like VoIP is only allowed via WiFI through the SDK. I would expect a front facing camera to only be around .3MP.
I agree.
So what is Digg? a place where there are threads about threads?
Whats wrong with the original tread? can I not talk about it there?
One of the most useless web items ever imho.
Right, except you obviously don't get it... the point of Digg is to tell other people about sites that others have found. Social bookmarking is what they call it... sure, I can go to the individual pages and comment on there, but I wouldn't have found that particular article in the first place of not for Digg, Reddit, Slashdot, etc... its a hell of a lot easier than going to 5000 websites a day looking for updates.
Also, if it's it's just a version of iChat for the phone, expect iPhone > iChat and iChat > to iPhone conferencing...
That would be pretty sweet- are there cell phones out there right now that let you conference with someone on a computer and phone to phone?
The camera would have to image through both the polarized crystals, and the color filters. I'm wondering how that would be worked around.
Just FYI
I registered just because this annoyed me. The video oh so elegantly leaves out the parts where Kevin VERY specifically says, this is all rumor. He said that he had some different sources than last year. Also at the end when he said, "don't post this on Digg", he actually said, don't post this on digg because I don't want it to come back on me when all this sh** is wrong.
Just FYI
He states that its rumour 2 and 7 seconds into the video.
Also, this feature was rumoured long before the iPhone was officially announced in January 2007. With the SDK now allowing VoIP with WiFi and that iChat will be coming to v2.0 it's a not a big stretch for me to see how this one has resurfaced.