I don't know. Most pictures are taken in landscape.
That's an excellent point.
Indeed, I had a nagging suspicion that there was something amiss with folders of iPhone photos and was never able to put my finger on it..... now I know!
iLounge is corroborating a recent rumor that has the third-generation iPod nano gaining a point-and-shoot digital camera similar to the one found on the iPhone."
Now why would Apple think the public needs a Nano with a camera? You can't send the pics -so why go through the hassle? I agree with the poster who says all phones already have them and you can send them both MMS and download them bluetooth. Just doesn't seem very practical.
And what about the lawsuits when people start snapping those pics at the gyms?
with a screen aspect ratio of 1.5:1, up from 1.33:1
1.5:1 makes no sense to me (except that some still cameras use that ratio). All new TV production is 1.79:1 and movies are either 1.85 or 2.39:1, except for some European productions where some are 1.66:1. Only pre-1954 movies are 1.33:1. You don't want to letterbox such a small screen. While 1.5:1 is better than 1.33:1, it's still not wide enough.
I'm starting to think all these "rumors" that these "experts" come up with are really from their brainstorming sessions.
It seems like they're starting to pull them out of thin air now.
which is pretty much like what some of the stuff you come out with
I don't buy it, at least not until we see some "fake" pics, you know the ones that have been right for how many years now, but the crazies still shout "FAAAKE!" like the are the godz of photoshop
EDIT: if you search over to iLounge, you will notice that this informant has been 100% accurate in the past. iLounge doesn't report often due to the fact they're very very careful about public image it seems, but when they do post, its generally quite accurate. The 4th Gen rumors came from there.
EDIT: if you search over to iLounge, you will notice that this informant has been 100% accurate in the past. iLounge doesn't report often due to the fact they're very very careful about public image it seems, but when they do post, its generally quite accurate. The 4th Gen rumors came from there.
Well iLounge was certainly 100% right on their review of the new shuffle- they panned it.
iPhone is a computer in many respects. Look back ten years at the mobile industry's hardware and software. Consider what we currently have......now look ahead five to ten years. I foresee the waning importance of the home desktop in the future as these little devices become more capable/powerful.
Who here thinks the matte black back looks kick ass besides me!
Now why would Apple think the public needs a Nano with a camera? You can't send the pics -so why go through the hassle? I agree with the poster who says all phones already have them and you can send them both MMS and download them bluetooth. Just doesn't seem very practical.
And what about the lawsuits when people start snapping those pics at the gyms?
You can use the pics once you get to iTunes on your computer. Who knows, maybe they will be getting WiFi?
anyway, you can take pics at the gym with your phone.
EDIT: if you search over to iLounge, you will notice that this informant has been 100% accurate in the past. iLounge doesn't report often due to the fact they're very very careful about public image it seems, but when they do post, its generally quite accurate. The 4th Gen rumors came from there.
1.5:1 makes no sense to me (except that some still cameras use that ratio). All new TV production is 1.79:1 and movies are either 1.85 or 2.39:1, except for some European productions where some are 1.66:1. Only pre-1954 movies are 1.33:1. You don't want to letterbox such a small screen. While 1.5:1 is better than 1.33:1, it's still not wide enough.
The 3:2 ratio is that of the (D)SLR camera. Movies are different to pictures: you don't shoot movies in vertical orientation. And a 1.8:1 or 2.4:1 ration would look silly for portrait photos.
...According to the report, new models will arrive sometime between July and August with a screen aspect ratio of 1.5:1, up from 1.33:1 on the current fourth-generation model. ...
if this is a change that can be done, why does everyone squawk when there are rumors of an iPhone pad or nano with a larger/smaller/different aspect screen, claiming such a change would require a rewrite of the whole phone OS?
is it because the phone has a touch screen and the other pods don't? how exactly does that make the resolution/dimensions issue so much different?
besides: 1.5:1 is the same as 3:2 and 6:4. 4x6 is a pretty standard print format. And while people talk a lot about 8x10 prints, many printers today utilize paper that can produce an 8 x 12 for the same price (they print the 8x10 on 8x12 paper and trim the unused waste) and for a variety of reasons the 8 x 12 is a superior format to 8x10.
Comments
I don't know. Most pictures are taken in landscape.
That's an excellent point.
Indeed, I had a nagging suspicion that there was something amiss with folders of iPhone photos and was never able to put my finger on it..... now I know!
iLounge is corroborating a recent rumor that has the third-generation iPod nano gaining a point-and-shoot digital camera similar to the one found on the iPhone."
[ View this article at AppleInsider.com ]
You mean fourth-generation iPod nano.
And what about the lawsuits when people start snapping those pics at the gyms?
You mean fourth-generation iPod nano.
Perhaps we're going stumpy again...
with a screen aspect ratio of 1.5:1, up from 1.33:1
1.5:1 makes no sense to me (except that some still cameras use that ratio). All new TV production is 1.79:1 and movies are either 1.85 or 2.39:1, except for some European productions where some are 1.66:1. Only pre-1954 movies are 1.33:1. You don't want to letterbox such a small screen. While 1.5:1 is better than 1.33:1, it's still not wide enough.
you're upside down!
zo ɟo zuǝ
(¡ʇıɯɯɐp) uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹ,noʎ 'ou
I'm starting to think all these "rumors" that these "experts" come up with are really from their brainstorming sessions.
It seems like they're starting to pull them out of thin air now.
which is pretty much like what some of the stuff you come out with
I don't buy it, at least not until we see some "fake" pics, you know the ones that have been right for how many years now, but the crazies still shout "FAAAKE!" like the are the godz of photoshop
EDIT: if you search over to iLounge, you will notice that this informant has been 100% accurate in the past. iLounge doesn't report often due to the fact they're very very careful about public image it seems, but when they do post, its generally quite accurate. The 4th Gen rumors came from there.
haha isn't this one of them?
EDIT: if you search over to iLounge, you will notice that this informant has been 100% accurate in the past. iLounge doesn't report often due to the fact they're very very careful about public image it seems, but when they do post, its generally quite accurate. The 4th Gen rumors came from there.
Well iLounge was certainly 100% right on their review of the new shuffle- they panned it.
1.5:1 makes no sense to me
Except the fact that the iPhone and iPod touch use this ratio?
I miss Apple the Computer Company
iPhone is a computer in many respects. Look back ten years at the mobile industry's hardware and software. Consider what we currently have......now look ahead five to ten years. I foresee the waning importance of the home desktop in the future as these little devices become more capable/powerful.
Who here thinks the matte black back looks kick ass besides me!
Now why would Apple think the public needs a Nano with a camera? You can't send the pics -so why go through the hassle? I agree with the poster who says all phones already have them and you can send them both MMS and download them bluetooth. Just doesn't seem very practical.
And what about the lawsuits when people start snapping those pics at the gyms?
You can use the pics once you get to iTunes on your computer. Who knows, maybe they will be getting WiFi?
anyway, you can take pics at the gym with your phone.
haha isn't this one of them?
EDIT: if you search over to iLounge, you will notice that this informant has been 100% accurate in the past. iLounge doesn't report often due to the fact they're very very careful about public image it seems, but when they do post, its generally quite accurate. The 4th Gen rumors came from there.
aahh, the Thot Plickens!
You can use the pics once you get to iTunes on your computer. Who knows, maybe they will be getting WiFi?
anyway, you can take pics at the gym with your phone.
Phones are banned at my gym.
1.5:1 makes no sense to me (except that some still cameras use that ratio). All new TV production is 1.79:1 and movies are either 1.85 or 2.39:1, except for some European productions where some are 1.66:1. Only pre-1954 movies are 1.33:1. You don't want to letterbox such a small screen. While 1.5:1 is better than 1.33:1, it's still not wide enough.
The 3:2 ratio is that of the (D)SLR camera. Movies are different to pictures: you don't shoot movies in vertical orientation. And a 1.8:1 or 2.4:1 ration would look silly for portrait photos.
Phones are banned at my gym.
Must be because something about you makes them nervous....
Must be because something about you makes them nervous....
No- more like they're banned so people can't be be blabbering on them like they way you post your thoughts on here incessantly.
...According to the report, new models will arrive sometime between July and August with a screen aspect ratio of 1.5:1, up from 1.33:1 on the current fourth-generation model. ...
if this is a change that can be done, why does everyone squawk when there are rumors of an iPhone pad or nano with a larger/smaller/different aspect screen, claiming such a change would require a rewrite of the whole phone OS?
is it because the phone has a touch screen and the other pods don't? how exactly does that make the resolution/dimensions issue so much different?
besides: 1.5:1 is the same as 3:2 and 6:4. 4x6 is a pretty standard print format. And while people talk a lot about 8x10 prints, many printers today utilize paper that can produce an 8 x 12 for the same price (they print the 8x10 on 8x12 paper and trim the unused waste) and for a variety of reasons the 8 x 12 is a superior format to 8x10.
No- more like they're banned so people can't be be blabbering on them like they way you post your thoughts on here incessantly.
Teckstud, I am accepting applications for a website forums bodyguard. Will you protect me from the unwashed masses?