If the 4.7 were favoured over the 5.5, your fear and detest would turn to surprise and delight in the eyes of Apple's customers.
Oh Benjie, this is getting sad now.
I'm not the one who expressed concern over the possibility that Apple may make one phone more capable than another. I simply referenced the many here that have. I don't have an opinion on parity vs. differentiation myself. I'd prefer a larger screen, but that doesn't mean I expect or demand that a larger unit be more capable than, or even necessarily equivalent to, a smaller device.
If it turns out that there are two models, and the smaller one does things the bigger one doesn't, it will not bother in me in the slightest to know that it made people happy.
Apple never did release a tablet in the 7" range. The iPad Mini is 30-40% larger than 7" tablets.
When you're spouting off at people, it helps if you don't post idiotic comments yourself.
What a silly petty sounding statement. OF COURSE a screen sizer larger than 6" and smaller than 8" would be in the "7 inch range". If we didn't know better it would sound like you're trolling mStone. I'm sure that wouldn't be your intention as it's not all helpful or adds to the discussion.
Apple never did release a tablet in the 7" range. The iPad Mini is 30-40% larger than 7" tablets.
When you're spouting off at people, it helps if you don't post idiotic comments yourself.
What a silly petty sounding statement. OF COURSE a screen sizer larger than 6" and smaller than 8" would be in the "7 inch range". If we didn't know better it would sound like you're trolling mStone. I'm sure that wouldn't be your intention as it's not all helpful or adds to the discussion.
What a stupid thing to say.
An iPad mini is as much in the 7" range as an iPad; it means nothing, rather like the way Google overlap phone dimensions to be as far from transparency as possible. It's just the usual Apple haters like mstone and you trying to make Steve Jobs look like he went back on what he said by twisting the truth beyond recognition.
Hint: it's not cool to emulate Samsung's moral dimension.
Yes. You know what we’re discussing here. I’ve already outlined that conditional.
Sheesh, I only just got to this thread and haven't read back through 3 pages of lengthy posts, forgive me. I took that particular post at face value and couldn't immediately understand it, forgive me. No need for the attitude just because I asked a question.
So you haven't seen a phone that doesn't run Android that requires two hands then? Going back a bit, how about the Sidekick? Or, more recently, how about the big Windows Phones (6" for the Lumia 1520)? The newest Blackberrys max out at 5" so I'm not sure if they're in your "unusable" bracket, but they must be close, right?
If the camera lens is actually protruding, then I'm sure there's a damn good reason for that, that outweighs any aesthetic concerns some may have. It's not a big deal, especially if it enhances camera performance in some way.
Apple isn't going to have the lens stick out from the phone. The design would be awful.
It sticks out of the similarly designed iPod touch and I can assure you that it is completely a non issue. I have no difficult at all in believing it will protrude.
Comments
If the 4.7 were favoured over the 5.5, your fear and detest would turn to surprise and delight in the eyes of Apple's customers.
Oh Benjie, this is getting sad now.
I'm not the one who expressed concern over the possibility that Apple may make one phone more capable than another. I simply referenced the many here that have. I don't have an opinion on parity vs. differentiation myself. I'd prefer a larger screen, but that doesn't mean I expect or demand that a larger unit be more capable than, or even necessarily equivalent to, a smaller device.
If it turns out that there are two models, and the smaller one does things the bigger one doesn't, it will not bother in me in the slightest to know that it made people happy.
When you're spouting off at people, it helps if you don't post idiotic comments yourself.
You should take your own advice.
What a silly petty sounding statement. OF COURSE a screen sizer larger than 6" and smaller than 8" would be in the "7 inch range". If we didn't know better it would sound like you're trolling mStone. I'm sure that wouldn't be your intention as it's not all helpful or adds to the discussion.
Never have I seen or used a phone that would require two hands to dial.
Apple never did release a tablet in the 7" range. The iPad Mini is 30-40% larger than 7" tablets.
When you're spouting off at people, it helps if you don't post idiotic comments yourself.
What a silly petty sounding statement. OF COURSE a screen sizer larger than 6" and smaller than 8" would be in the "7 inch range". If we didn't know better it would sound like you're trolling mStone. I'm sure that wouldn't be your intention as it's not all helpful or adds to the discussion.
What a stupid thing to say.
An iPad mini is as much in the 7" range as an iPad; it means nothing, rather like the way Google overlap phone dimensions to be as far from transparency as possible. It's just the usual Apple haters like mstone and you trying to make Steve Jobs look like he went back on what he said by twisting the truth beyond recognition.
Hint: it's not cool to emulate Samsung's moral dimension.
Never have I seen or used a phone that would require two hands to dial.
I thought that was your beef with all the "unusable" larger phones and phablets?
Yes. You know what we’re discussing here. I’ve already outlined that conditional.
Yes. You know what we’re discussing here. I’ve already outlined that conditional.
Of course he did. His posts are pettiness personified.
I like the alliteration, but there’s no sense in being purposely animos... huh, you can’t use ‘animosity’ as a verb.
Yes. You know what we’re discussing here. I’ve already outlined that conditional.
Sheesh, I only just got to this thread and haven't read back through 3 pages of lengthy posts, forgive me. I took that particular post at face value and couldn't immediately understand it, forgive me. No need for the attitude just because I asked a question.
So you haven't seen a phone that doesn't run Android that requires two hands then? Going back a bit, how about the Sidekick? Or, more recently, how about the big Windows Phones (6" for the Lumia 1520)? The newest Blackberrys max out at 5" so I'm not sure if they're in your "unusable" bracket, but they must be close, right?
And shut up BF.
I like the alliteration, but there’s no sense in being purposely animos... huh, you can’t use ‘animosity’ as a verb.
Probably the best substitute would be antagonistic.
I thought Crowley was being deliberately petty, and as he seems to make a habit of it, I thought it appropriate to call him out on it.
5.5
if you don't believe now then you don't believe we landed on the Moon.
Well how to you explain this?
Well how to you explain this?
If you had a nickel for every pixel in that video, you couldn't make change for a quarter.
Apple isn't going to have the lens stick out from the phone. The design would be awful.
It sticks out of the similarly designed iPod touch and I can assure you that it is completely a non issue. I have no difficult at all in believing it will protrude.
I guess your atheistic sensibility doesn't require you to practise what you preach.
My initials aren't BF.
Shut up BF.
And? Do you often have orgies with your electronic devices?
http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/181779/surveillance-leak-shows-spyware-loves-android-but-cant-infect-apples-iphones-without-jailbreak#post_2577936