MCX hits pause on Apple Pay competitor CurrentC, fires 30 workers

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPhone edited May 2016
The Merchant Consumer Exchange consortium, which previously enjoyed support from major retailers like Walmart, CVS, The Gap and more, has postponed plans to take its CurrentC mobile payments product nationwide.




According to MCX CEO Brian Mooney, near term development efforts have turned to building out other segments of the business like partnerships with financial institutions, reports TechCrunch.

"Utilizing unique feedback from the marketplace and our Columbus pilot, MCX has made a decision to concentrate more heavily in the immediate term on other aspects of our business including working with financial institutions, like our partnership with Chase, to enable and scale mobile payment solutions," Mooney said. "As part of this transition, MCX will postpone a nationwide rollout of its CurrentC application. As MCX has said many times, the mobile payments space is just beginning to take shape - it is early in a long game. MCX's owner-members remain committed to our future."

The CurrentC mobile payments platform has been in development since 2012, initially devised to sidestep credit card network fees by directly linking to customer bank accounts. Efforts took a turn when smartphone heavyweights Apple and Google launched their own branded digital wallets, namely Apple Pay and Android Pay, which threatened CurrentC adoption. In a bid to better position its product, MCX restricted consortium members from accepting competing systems at point of sale terminals, starting with Apple Pay in 2014.

After development setbacks and a postponed launch, retail partners are abandoning ship. Last year, Rite Aid and Best Buy broke from MCX convention and began accepting other NFC solutions, including Apple Pay, at certain stores.

Earlier today, Walmart announced plans to roll out its own payment system -- Walmart Pay -- to more than 500 stores across Arkansas and Texas.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 30
    baconstangbaconstang Posts: 1,182member
    Surprise surprise.
    doozydozensupadav03phone-ui-guycornchiptdknox
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 30
    calicali Posts: 3,494member
    The disaster continues....
    phone-ui-guycornchiptdknoxnetmagejbdragon
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 30
    VisualSeedvisualseed Posts: 217member
    I kind of saw this coming when Walmart did its own payment system despite being the primary backer of this.
    cornchiptdknoxnetmagejbdragon
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 30
    I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!!
    anantksundaramtdknox
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 30
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,352member
    I kind of saw this coming when Walmart did its own payment system despite being the primary backer of this.
    Typical of WalMart to push something to get others to pay for startup research then take what they liked and created their own payment system using almost identical features and processes. I wonder how close WalMart's junk is to the MCX junk and whether MCX tried patenting anything before WalMart copied it. 
    calidoozydozenbattiato1981waverboycornchiptdknoxjbdragonjony0
     8Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 30
    calicali Posts: 3,494member
    Seriously how did MCX expect it's licensees to wait this long without accepting ApplePay?

    Fred-Meyer was smart for being the first to accept ApplePay, I wonder who's still waiting?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 30
    r00fus1r00fus1 Posts: 65member
    rob53 said:
    I kind of saw this coming when Walmart did its own payment system despite being the primary backer of this.
    Typical of WalMart to push something to get others to pay for startup research then take what they liked and created their own payment system using almost identical features and processes. I wonder how close WalMart's junk is to the MCX junk and whether MCX tried patenting anything before WalMart copied it. 
    Stay classy, Bentonville! I guess you could just call MCX a "stalking horse" for Walmart - does Walmart still have the pull to make their WalmartPay successful?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 30
    Apple Pay and Android Pay will cover 99% of humans with smartphones 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 30
    r00fus1 said:
    rob53 said:
    Typical of WalMart to push something to get others to pay for startup research then take what they liked and created their own payment system using almost identical features and processes. I wonder how close WalMart's junk is to the MCX junk and whether MCX tried patenting anything before WalMart copied it. 
    Stay classy, Bentonville! I guess you could just call MCX a "stalking horse" for Walmart - does Walmart still have the pull to make their WalmartPay successful?
    It brings me great joy to see Walmart getting hammered by Amazon
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 30
    supadav03supadav03 Posts: 504member
    As happy as I am about this, I still think Current-C was a better option than every retailer having "_____ Pay". Walmart announces theirs and Target is following suit with a QR code system. It's just going to get so much worse before it gets better. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 30
    jakebjakeb Posts: 563member
    Currentc must have been the most depressing place ever to work. Knowing you're building something that is completely pointless. 
    baconstangcornchiptdknox
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 30
    jungmarkjungmark Posts: 6,927member
    What a failure and waste of money. 
    anantksundaramtdknoxbancho
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 30
    supadav03 said:
    As happy as I am about this, I still think Current-C was a better option than every retailer having "_____ Pay". Walmart announces theirs and Target is following suit with a QR code system. It's just going to get so much worse before it gets better. 
    Really?! Better option? Have you ever used Apple Pay? Paying with Apple Watch (or iPhone) it takes a second to do a very very secure transaction where no tapping, no scanning, no waiting required.
    tdknoxrobin hubernetmagenolamacguy
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 30
    robin huberrobin huber Posts: 4,062member
    Thank god. Maybe CVS, who I am forced to use by my medical insurance, will finally take Pay. 
    tdknoxnetmage
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 30
    jungmarkjungmark Posts: 6,927member
    macintown said:
    supadav03 said:
    As happy as I am about this, I still think Current-C was a better option than every retailer having "_____ Pay". Walmart announces theirs and Target is following suit with a QR code system. It's just going to get so much worse before it gets better. 
    Really?! Better option? Have you ever used Apple Pay? Paying with Apple Watch (or iPhone) it takes a second to do a very very secure transaction where no tapping, no scanning, no waiting required.
    He's talking about first party "-Pay" systems. 
    diplication
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 30
    tylerdtylerd Posts: 33member
    macintown said:
    supadav03 said:
    As happy as I am about this, I still think Current-C was a better option than every retailer having "_____ Pay". Walmart announces theirs and Target is following suit with a QR code system. It's just going to get so much worse before it gets better. 
    Really?! Better option? Have you ever used Apple Pay? Paying with Apple Watch (or iPhone) it takes a second to do a very very secure transaction where no tapping, no scanning, no waiting required.
    @macintown ; - I think that @supadav03 's point is that Current-C is better than having a bunch of retailer specific payment options (Walmart-Pay, Target-Pay, Macy's-Pay, etc.). Neither of those options hold up to OS specific options such at ApplePay and AndroidPay. We all agree on that.
    diplication
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 30
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,478member
    macintown said:
    supadav03 said:
    As happy as I am about this, I still think Current-C was a better option than every retailer having "_____ Pay". Walmart announces theirs and Target is following suit with a QR code system. It's just going to get so much worse before it gets better. 
    Really?! Better option? Have you ever used Apple Pay? Paying with Apple Watch (or iPhone) it takes a second to do a very very secure transaction where no tapping, no scanning, no waiting required.
    Every retailer having their own unique and incompatible pay system is actually the worst option for consumers and will slow adaptation of better alternatives like Apple Pay. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 30
    rcponercpone Posts: 20member
    Walmart Pay? Ick! What's next, TargetPay, Jack-in-the-box Pay, McDonald's Pay, Whole Foods Pay, Kroger Pay, Safeway Pay, and on and on...
    coolfactor
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 30
    suddenly newtonsuddenly newton Posts: 13,819member
    Keep fighting NFC payment, MCX. Never give up. /s
    tdknox
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 30
    supadav03supadav03 Posts: 504member
    tylerd said:
    macintown said:
    Really?! Better option? Have you ever used Apple Pay? Paying with Apple Watch (or iPhone) it takes a second to do a very very secure transaction where no tapping, no scanning, no waiting required.
    @macintown ; - I think that @supadav03 's point is that Current-C is better than having a bunch of retailer specific payment options (Walmart-Pay, Target-Pay, Macy's-Pay, etc.). Neither of those options hold up to OS specific options such at ApplePay and AndroidPay. We all agree on that.
    Sorry I wasn't clearer. This is exactly what I meant. Sad truth is, every merchant wants to control the experience from start to end, so they will all take their shot at solutions before finally realizing NFC payments is the way to go. 
    coolfactor
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.