tmay

About

Username
tmay
Joined
Visits
529
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
9,213
Badges
2
Posts
5,762
  • Expedia chairman attacks Apple's 'disgusting' 30% commission fee

    Oh dear...

    Barry Diller also owns Expedia.com

    "HOW DOES EXPEDIA MAKE MONEY?

    Expedia makes its money in a few different ways. The largest of those ways is through hotel bookings, which the company is mainly known for allowing users to do. A whopping 70% of Expedia’s revenue is generated from hoteliers (people who own or manage hotels). The way that Expedia get’s here in the first place is through a simple supply and demand strategy. Expedia buys up a large number of rooms at a discounted cost and then advertises the bookings through their website as the cheapest you’ll find in the market.

    An example would be Expedia pushing for a 7-night all-inclusive trip to a remote island in the Caribbean. Expedia reaches out to a hotel on the island and buys up a block of, say, 100 rooms at a discounted price (because everything is cheaper in bulk). Expedia than buys a large number of plane tickets going to that island, usually at little to no discount. Then Expedia offers the deal to 2 people at a price like $1,700, which is most likely going to be at least marginally cheaper than it would through other sites. People get a good deal and Expedia is able to fill more plane seats and hotel rooms. And Expedia has only paid a part of what they charge the people for the service, meaning they profit from every transaction.

    Another way that Expedia makes money is through commission fees. Because Expedia always offers the lowest price (or at least a lower price than the hotel will offer), people will be far more willing to actually take a trip in the first place. So hoteliers are far more inclined to sell rooms to Expedia because some money is better than no money. The commission fees are usually between 20% and 25%.

    An example of the way that this works is that if a hotel sells a room (in this example we will use just one room, but in reality, it would be far more) to Expedia for $100 and Expedia gets the room booked, then Expedia will collect that $100 and pay the hotel $75 (if the fee is 25%). They will say that that $25 goes towards customer service, marketing, and various other business functions.

    HIDDEN FEES?

    Expedia makes a little on the side through fees. These fees aren’t hidden, but they’re also not in your face. They can get away with this because they don’t charge users a fee to actually book the hotel, or whatever it is that they are booking, in the first place. These fees include:

    • Cancellation fees when canceling a booking more than 24 hours after booking
    • Fees on some airlines for overweight baggage
    • Wi-Fi fees in some hotels
    • Off resort excursion fees
    • Fees for parking at particular venues
    • Meal fees at hotels
    • Fees at hotels for things like spas, gyms, and pools.

    HOW DOES EXPEDIA GET ITS DATA?

    Does Expedia have full-time employees whose sole responsibility is to troll the internet to find hotels that they can buy rooms from, and then contact those hotels and reach an agreement for those rooms? Definitely not. Expedia has a third party sourcing organization that does all that for them. This method is called “Merchant Inventory.” They have local contractors, essentially the ‘boots on the ground’ people that are collecting data about hotels in different areas as well.

    I'm thinking that this guy needs to have his business model exposed...

    pulseimagesfotoformat[Deleted User]Beatsmwhitedv8orS12rob53uraharaScot1
  • With iPhone 8, Apple's Silicon Gap widens as the new A11 Bionic obliterates top chips from...

    It is about the only thing that the iPhone X has going for it.
    This is your second post in two years; put down the bong, get off the couch, and put your back into it man. Stop being the lazy, ineffectual, troll that you are today and grow into the troll you were meant to be!

    MacRumors awaits you!
    2old4funsergiozfirelockred oakwilliamlondonbirkoredgeminipachabigStrangeDaysAvieshek
  • Apple ups orders for 5nm chips from TSMC, presumably for new iPhone

    danvdr said:
    10,000? Seems like a pretty small number.
    I'm thinking 10,000 wafers. For a 300 mm diameter wafer, that's probably 20 to 30 million processors total, depending on die size and yield.
    muthuk_vanalingamRenderdogspock1234jdb8167danvdrd_2mdriftmeyerpujones1watto_cobra
  • Apple Music rival Spotify tops 140 million free & paid subscribers

    Spotify financials:

    Revenue up 50% to $3.3 billion; operating loss $390 million; net loss $601 million.
    john.bslprescottlkruppdirecthackerlolliverlostkiwi[Deleted User]stanthemanwatto_cobra
  • Microsoft in talks to buy TikTok for up to $30 billion

    I came across this 2018 article about ByteDance's founder;

    Not pretty;

    https://chinamediaproject.org/2018/04/11/tech-shame-in-the-new-era/

    Apology and reflection

    今日头条的朋友们:

    Dear friends of Jinri Toutiao:

    我真诚地向监管部门致歉,向用户及同事们道歉。 从昨天下午接到监管部门的通知到现在,我一直处在自责和内疚之中,一夜未眠。

    I earnestly apologise to regulatory authorities, and to our users and colleagues. Since receiving the notice yesterday from regulatory authorities, I have been filled with remorse and guilt, entirely unable to sleep.

    今日头条将永久关停“内涵段子”客户端软件及公众号。产品走错了路,出现了与社会主义核心价值观不符的内容,没有贯彻好舆论导向,接受处罚,所有责任在我。

    Jinri Toutiao will shut down once and for all its “Neihan Duanzi” app and its public accounts. Our product took the wrong path, and content appeared that was incommensurate with socialist core values, that did not properly implement public opinion guidance — and I am personally responsible for the punishments we have received [as a result].

    自责是因为辜负了主管部门一直以来的指导和期待。过去几年间,主管部门给了我们很多的指导和帮助,但我内心没有真正理解和认识到位,也没有整改到位,造成今天对用户不负责任的结果。

    I am responsible because I failed to live up to the guidance and expectations supervisory organs have demanded all along. Over the past few years, the regulatory authorities have provided us with much guidance and assistance, but in our hearts we failed to properly understand and recognise [their demands]. Nor did we properly rectify the situation, which led to the present failure to be responsible to our users.

    自责也是因为辜负了用户的支持和信任。我们片面注重增长和规模,却没有及时强化质量和责任,忽视了引导用户获取正能量信息的责任。对承担企业社会责任,弘扬正能量,把握正确的舆论导向认识不够,思想上缺乏重视。

    I am responsible also because I failed to live up to the trust and support placed in me by our users. We prioritised only the expansion of [platform] scale, and we were not timely in strengthening quality and responsibility, overlooking our responsibility to channel users in the uptake of information with positive energy. We were insufficiently attentive, and in our thinking placed insufficient emphasis on our corporate social responsibility, to promote positive energy and to grasp correct guidance of public opinion.

    同时,我也辜负了投入无限热情和心血打造了这款产品的同事。产品出现这么大的问题,停止服务,我有领导责任。

    At the same time, I failed my colleagues who invested such boundless enthusiasm and hard work to create this product. For such major problems to emerge with the product, and for service to halt, I bear leadership responsibility.

    3月29日央视报道我们的广告问题后,我不断反思自己以前的想法,反思公司现在的做法,开始大力推进公司员工提高意识、改进管理、完善流程。

    On March 29, after China Central Television reported problems with our advertisements, I engaged in steady reflection over my previous ways of thinking, reflected upon the company’s current methods, and began an energetic campaign among our staff to raise their consciousness, improve management and streamline processes.

    我是工程师出身,创业的初心是希望做一款产品,方便全世界用户互动和交流。过去几年间,我们把更多的精力和资源,放在了企业的增长上,却没有采取足够措施,来补上我们在平台监管、企业社会责任上欠下的功课,比如对低俗、暴力、有害内容、虚假广告的有效治理。

    My background is engineering, and my originating idea in starting this business was to create a product that would facilitate interaction and exchange among users worldwide. Over the past few years we have invested more energy and resources in the growth of the company, but we did not take the proper measures to improve supervision of the platform, and we did not adequately do our homework in terms of effectively controlling such things as low-row, violent and harmful content, and fake advertising.

    我们作为一家十八大后快速发展起来的创业公司,深知公司的快速发展,是伟大时代给的机会。我感恩这个时代,感恩改革开放历史机遇,感恩国家对于科技产业发展的扶持。

    As a start-up company developing rapidly in the wake of the 18th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, we profoundly understand that our rapid development was an opportunity afforded us by this great era. I thank this era. I thank the historic opportunity of economic reform and opening; and I thank the support the government has given for the development of the technology industry.

    我深刻反思,公司目前存在问题的深层次原因是:“四个意识”淡薄、社会主义核心价值观教育缺失、舆论导向存在偏差。一直以来,我们过分强调技术的作用,却没有意识到,技术必须要用社会主义核心价值观来引导,传播正能量,符合时代要求,尊重公序良俗。

    I profoundly reflect on the fact that a deep-level cause of the recent problems in my company is: a weak [understanding and implementation of] the “four consciousnesses” [of Xi Jinping]; deficiencies in education on the socialist core values; and deviation from public opinion guidance. All along, we have placed excessive emphasis on the role of technology, and we have not acknowledged that technology must be led by the socialist core value system, broadcasting positive energy, suiting the demands of the era, and respecting common convention.

    我们必须重新梳理我们的愿景。我们说,要做全球的创作与交流平台。这就要求我们必须保证所“创作”与“交流”的内容是积极向上的、健康有益的,能够给时代、给人民带来正能量。

    We must make a renewed effort to sort out our vision of the future. We say, we want to make global platform for creation and conversation. This demands that we must ensure that the content of “creation” and “conversation” are positive, healthy and beneficial, that they can offer positive energy to the era, and to the people.

    我们必须重新阐释并切实践行我们的社会责任:正直向善,科技创新,创造价值,担当责任,合作共赢。我深刻地认识到,企业的发展必须紧扣时代和国家发展主旋律。

    We must renew our understanding and enactment of our social responsibility; upright and good, innovative technology, value creation, taking responsibility, cooperation and mutual benefit. I profoundly recognise that the company’s development must stick closely to the era and to the main theme of national development.

    今天,监管部门、公众和媒体指出了公司存在的问题,是对我们的善意提醒和有力鞭策。我跟我的同事们将立即着手改变,改变自己的思想,改变我们的做法。

    Today, supervisory organs, the public and the media have pointed out problems in our company, and this is well-intentioned reminder and an encouragement to us. I and my colleagues will work immediately to bring about change — changing our own thoughts, and changing our methods.

    一、将正确的价值观融入技术和产品

    Introducing correct values into technology and products
    1、加强党建工作,对全体员工进行“四个意识”、社会主义核心价值观、舆论导向、法律法规等教育,真正履行好企业的社会责任。

    1.1 Strengthening the work of Party construction, carrying out education among our entire staff on the “four consciousnesses,” socialist core values, [correct] guidance of public opinion, and laws and regulations, truly acting on the company’s social responsibility.

    2、强化各业务线履行社会责任的制度化机制化,将其列入业务考核范围。

    1.2 Strengthening implementation of systems and mechanisms for social responsibility in various business activities, bringing them into the scope of business assessment.

    3、进一步深化与权威媒体合作,提高权威媒体内容的分发,保证权威声音有力传播。

    1.3 Further deepening cooperation with authoritative [official Party] media, elevating distribution of authoritative media content, ensuring that authoritative [official Party] media voices are broadcast to strength.

    4、强化总编辑责任制,全面纠正算法和机器审核的缺陷,不断强化人工运营和审核,将现有6000人的运营审核队伍,扩大到10000人。

    1.4 Strengthening the editor-in-chief responsibility system, comprehensively correcting deficiencies in algorithmic and machine review [of content], steadily strengthening human operations and review, raising the current number of operational review staff from 6,000 to 10,000 persons [carrying out content review].

    [Translation omitted here for section on management of online communities]

    Finally, I again express my apologies to supervisory organs, and to the friends who care about us.

    我们理应做得更好。我们一定会做得更好。

    We ought to do better. We will definitely do better.

    我们真诚地期待社会各界帮助和监督我们的整改。我们绝不辜负大家的期望。

    We earnestly await help from various parts of society in supervising our rectification. We will not disappoint everyones’ hopes.

    今日头条创始人、CEO张一鸣

    Jinri Toutiao founder and CEO Zhang Yiming.

    2018年4月11日

    April 11, 2018


    The CCP at work...
    BeatsGG1muthuk_vanalingamradarthekatcat52anantksundaramgatorguywatto_cobra
  • White House shot down Intel plans to increase chip production in China

    Xed said:
    LOL I can't wait to hear the contortions of people ... that hate private US companies from doing any business outside the US, especially in China.
    I buy from non-dictatorships any time I can, even when it costs more. But I don't hate. Don't make it sounds that I'm motivated by hate. I'm motivated by love for freedom and democracy. 

    If you want to imagine that I'm motivated by hate, I guess that's your right to be wrong.
    Are you an American? You are illogical. You do not live in China. Why are you afraid of losing freedom and democracy because of China? 
    Gee, if only the PRC would limit itself to occupying Mainland China.

    Instead, it's all about invading Taiwan, occupying the South China Sea, and the First Island Chain, as if those were exclusive economic zones for the PRC. Moreover, the PRC is more than happy to export its brand of authoritarianism. Fortunately, the West is quite aware of the PRC's broad expansionist plans, and while late to constrain the PRC, the West is strengthening alliances to resist that expansionism, both militarily and economically.

    Meanwhile, the PRC has a limited timeframe to do all of this before its heavily senior demographics overwhelms its shrinking working population, all with a birth rate that is too little to maintain the population. It's probable that the PRC won't ever be a rich country, and can expect its population to halve by 2060.

    What the West is concerned about is that Xi will launch an invasion of Taiwan by 2025, and will attempt to challenge the West's military supremacy in the Pacific in this decade, but that risk diminishes by 2035.
    williamlondonronnjas99killroycat52StrangeDaysJWSCqwerty52gmulwatto_cobra
  • Apple closes all retail stores outside of China until March 27

    echosonic said:
    This is the most overblown BS I have seen in my lifetime.  Pure hype.  The entirety of the American media should be dissolved for creating this panic.

    Corona killed what, less than 100 Americans?  Swine Flu killed 23,000 Americans, nothing.  Measles?  Nothing.  H1N1?  Nothing.  EBOLA?  Not a damned thing.  

    One basketball player gets a cold and the whole country loses its f#$(%(&  mind.  

    Glad I have cash on hand because the market is having the sale of the century, and all its going to cost is the economy, and thousands of jobs.

    Shame on all of you lemmings who are playing along.
    Thank you for being today's contrarian dipshit.

    Please enjoy spending your excessive free time in bars, and concerts with the rest of the doubting dipshits.

    Don't forget all of that demand destruction that is going on when you make your investments.

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zx3WVpp8y-SMLrxg3tckbF5PmcV0FCtuyWuUiFVYiUo/edit

    This above a twitter thread from a doctor in an ICU in Washington state, translated for the public by a medical student.

    Here is a portion;

    "
    • ●  Since 2/28, they’ve seen 21 patients and 11 deaths.
      Although disease is expected to be worse in patients who are older with comorbidities, they have also seen young healthy patients critically ill.

    • ●  They estimate COVID-19 has been spreading in the United States since January, thus making it challenging to contain now because so many people are infected with either mild/no symptoms.

    • ●  In their hospital, the entire intensive care unit (ICU) is being used for patients that are critically ill with COVID-19. Another floor is dedicated to patients with COVID-19 that are stable (their clinical course is not expected to change rapidly so they do not need as high a staff:patient ratio) and end of life care. Half of the progressive care unit (PCU) and emergency room (ER) are also being used for patients that are stable.

    • ●  Patients with new respiratory symptoms are being held in the pulmonary clinic as overflow.

    • ●  Because COVID-19 is thought to be spread through aerosols, there is higher risk to healthcare providers in procedures that generate aerosols such as intubation (placing a breathing tube), suctioning the airway, or performing a bronchoscopy (looking into the lungs with a camera). For aerosol-generating procedures, it was previously recommended that providers wear a N95 mask (which protects against viruses or bacteria spread through the air) as opposed to a normal surgical mask, which protects against droplets. The CDC is no longer asking providers who were wearing a surgical mask (droplet protection) during aerosol-generating procedures to stay home.

      There is much more, but the bottom line is that the medical system is already stretched past the limit.


    and,



    (the 19th Surgeon General of the United States)


    "THREAD: Yesterday, I spoke with doctors from one of the nation’s leading academic hospitals located in a state where #COVID19 cases are increasing quickly. This is what they told me: They've been seeing *many* patients with symptoms concerning for COVID19 who need testing (1/x)"

    "
    But they are unable to get the *vast majority* of them COVID19 testing. Their only resource for testing is the state lab. But the state lab is severely limited in capacity and it will take another few weeks for the hospital lab to implement its own test. (2/x)"

    "
    So the hospital is saving their test requests for only those who are severely ill - such as those with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) who have tested negative for other conditions (like influenza). In other words, they are having to ration tests. (3/x)"
    MacProOnPartyBusinessequality72521Anilu_777hammeroftruthbaconstangdbreckDogpersonking editor the grateMisterKit
  • Huawei CFO arrest in Canada could affect iPhone tariffs if US-China trade talks sour

    DAalseth said:
    Something I don't understand. The US may be pissed with the company for violating the US law. They have the right to block export to the company, and the import and sale of the companies products into the US. To even lay fines on the company and seize its assets in the US.
    But how can they look at criminally charging a Chinese citizen who works for a Chinese company that is doing business in China?
    Does this mean that Saudi Arabia could demand my extradition for violating their Apostasy laws?
    Could Russia demand my extradition for slandering Putin and his criminal regime?
    The US has a beef with the company, but why would they have any jurisdiction for criminal charges?
    Resale of U.S. technology into Iran, technology that is banned by U.S. Law, is the claim.
    sdw2001racerhomie3cornchipcmd-zn2itivguyravnorodomwatto_cobrajony0
  • White House shot down Intel plans to increase chip production in China

    The chip shortage will continue under Biden administration. Companies will not manufacture chips in US. They cannot make money. If they try to raise prices they need to double or triple the prices. And this route is not working. Democrats have no concept of capitalism. 
    Chip fabs are heavily automated, so it doesn't really matter all that much which country they are built in, but the investment is huge. Intel is asking to invest in Silicon Wafer production, not chip production. You haven't a clue about the comparative costs. 

    Even at that, I am absolutely against allowing continued investment in the PRC simply because much of the high tech from the West is dual use, ie, used in both Civilian and Military production. We certainly shouldn't enhance PLANRF's ability to build even greater numbers of more effective ballistic missiles and warheads, nor allow the PLAAF to build more and better more and better aircraft and air to air missiles.


    ronnwilliamlondonjas99killroycat52wg45678StrangeDaysJWSCqwerty52watto_cobra
  • Apple researching audio system that uses speaker airflow for cooling

    dewme said:
    Sound is a physical force, so yeah, this makes sense. I recall a college professor of mine showing me a tiny piezoelectric based cooling device with little flaps that could provide totally quiet cooling in a very confined space. It looked promising. GE eventually patented a piezoelectric cooling jet technique in 2004 and sold it off to a Japanese company. Not sure whether it ever gained widespread application, but the whole notion of using vibration, whether induced by speaker voice coils or piezoelectric crystals, to move air is fully reasonable. As with most technology that involves secondary or opportunistic “harvesting” of energy that would otherwise be ignored or wasted, it all comes down to efficiency and whether the intended benefit is worth the added complexity and cost. Inventions only become innovations if they can be put to practical use for the benefit of mankind. Otherwise, they’re just cool ideas, no pun intended.
    There was some research on using aerodynamic "flutter" in horizontal vanes/surfaces to generate electricity from the wind, presumably from piezoelectric materials incorporated in the surfaces. 
    gregoriusmlolliverwatto_cobradysamoriacornchip