edac2

Nowhere does it imply that the iPhone 7 and 8 screen is the same size as the SE. There is a drop down menu, and you can select a screen protector for the SE, or one that fits the 7 and 8. It doesn’t even imply that SE is the official name of a new model, just that they added a screen protector for an existing model. 

Maybe QuarkXPress isn't mentioned here because it is hardly a cheaper alternative to Indesign. Quark is $400 on the App Store; the QuarkXPress Store lists it as $250/year ($750 total) for Indesign switchers. Quark was always full of itself and used to charge $900 for a single-language edition, so I guess it's gone down in price since its glory days. But you would be much better off switching to Affinity Publisher than a program built on a 1990's framework.

AppleCar's "air freshener" will probably be co-branded with Chanel and cost $9.95 a month to use.

If you only care about roads and highways, Google Maps wins hands down. But if you want to know where trains are, or even something as simple as borders (ANY border), Apple Maps is far superior. I liken it to an engineer (Google) vs designer (Apple) approach to cartography. The failure of Apple is its insistence on using Apple-only apps for its maps, and worse, a proprietary and confusing language of navigation controls. In order to gain any traction, Apple Maps needs to be browser-based like Google Maps. DuckDuckGo uses Apple Maps, but without the 3D feature. The Apple Maps app for iOS offers a 3D view, but the Google Maps app does not; you have to use the separate Google Earth app for that feature.

I love the promotional photo of the packed Microsoft Store used to illustrate this article. Are those actual customers, or Microsoft employees on their lunch break?

On the other hand, Apple might be working on an updated version of MacOS for a touch-screen MacBook Pro.