jellybelly

About

Username
jellybelly
Joined
Visits
59
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
354
Badges
1
Posts
111
  • Mini LED coming to 11-inch iPad Pro in 2022, Kuo says

    Simple:  OLED can experience burn-in of graphics that appear for long periods of time. Also, and related, the”O” stands for organic.  Organic compounds usually don’t have the lifespan of inorganic compounds. In OLED, blue has a much shorter lifespan than Red and Green. This could lead to color fading and inaccurate color over time—YMMV.  
    The biggest advantage of Mini and Micro LED can be in brightness. OLED can achieve up to 1,000 nits of brightness, while inorganic Mini and Micro LEDs can emit up to 5,000 nits of brightness Mini LEDs can approach the blacks of OLED depending on the resolution used for backlighting ( which is getting higher all the time). Micro LEDs match OLEDs in blackness values. So, contrast ratios can be much higher with Mini and Micro LEDs, compared to OLED due to the higher brightness. 

    They’re getting really good results with Mini-LED. Plus it’s a run-up to Micro-LED, in a not obvious way—more in manufacturing than in as a back light for a group of pixels vs. a light for each subpixel of R,B,G,G respectively. 
    StrangeDaysapplguydoozydozenfastasleepdewmeFileMakerFeller
  • Dutch antitrust regulators launch probe into Apple Pay

    Sarkany said:
    Secure? Funny. I guess you didn’t read the article with the WiFi exploit. Who knows what kind of security hole is being exploited this very moment by a bad actor on Apple itself or their devices. Get real.
    When you load your card onto Apple Pay, it is encrypted and sent to VISA, MasterCard, or whatever company manages the card. Then VISA eg. will issue a different set of 16 digits encrypted to send back and be stored in the Secure Enclave silicon on your iPhone. Only VISA knows the new 16 digits and only VISA has the encryption key. The Secure Enclave does not communicate without encryption, and only VISA can translate the encryption. New keys are used on every transaction. VISA et al only collect info that would be collected to make the payment, the same info collected with a card transaction.

    Read up on it at Anandtech.com or ArsTechnica.com via search on sites. AppleInsider may have an archive article on the subject as well.

    It’s so secure that credit card companies and banks offer a discounted usage fee to Apple. 
    As in the VISA example, not even your bank knows the key. VISA does the communication with your bank directly.

    If you don’t trust a company like VISA and their communicating with your bank, then you don’t have any cards at all. As far as the Secure Enclave, it is silicon that would be destructed if it is tampered with physically. Software-wise, the encryption is safer than using a card directly to pay for something.

    Be happy, not cynical. ߎ栦amp;nbsp;(emoji for musical notes).
    gc_ukGeorgeBMactwokatmewanantksundaramRayz2016watto_cobra
  • Lunar details a 'very exciting time' for high end Mac Pro, Apple Silicon

    This is an uplifting article with insight into real life consequences of Apple’s intense focus and skills in integration of software and hardware. 
    I work in high level photography and design. My work is faster, higher quality, and a pleasure to produce with the tools I now can use. 
    Video and 3D artists have much more complex workloads than I do, so I greatly appreciate D.E.D.’s concise yet very deep look into how these complex and demanding workflows are are so vastly improved due to Apple’s integrated design culture. 
    I set aside my work in 3D fifteen years ago due to its time demands hurting my productivity in my specialty areas. I feel I can now revisit 3D and put it to good use in content I produce. 
    Nice one, D.E.D.!
    macplusplustenthousandthingsmknelsonkillroyd_2JapheycgWerkswatto_cobrarundhvid
  • Apple's headset drastically changed over time & top execs are skeptical

    Think of it as a hobby for Apple in the short term similar to the Apple TV box. 
    Sometimes Apple has to have an evolving product in the market.  

    The key will be content and how it’s shown—and that’s where Apple will excel. Not just entertaining content, but massive real world content.  They may be able to improve Street View information overlays and a better 3D experience, starting with just a couple of cities and building on that. 

    Crowd sourcing content might also contribute to an expanding hardware and content ecosystem. You might be able to contribute environment data using the device’s onboard cameras and GPS and other sensors adding in machine learning, combining multiple user’s data to create an ever increasing detailed view of the world around us. 

    I expect the first year to be mostly developer sales with a high price tag or subscription that is partially returnable upon exchange of unit for version two. This will be a slowly gaining set of assets that will accelerate in the second and third year. 

    It will still have some wow factor on release. In addition to developers, well heeled Apple enthusiasts will also afford the risk of version one. 

    Another thought is leasing or subscription of the devices, and getting credit against the lease or towards early payoff by credit points scored in a game of collecting the real world data.  That would be gaming motivation and financial motivation.

    There’s also great curiosity in why so many iPad Apps are easily adaptable or already ok to use on the device. What’s that about?????

    I can’t wait to see the introduction but I will wait.  It’s only weeks away. 
    williamlondonwatto_cobra9secondkox2
  • After years of silence, Apple finally reveals how many App Store users it has in Europe

    haikus said:
    Perhaps the author decided to use “Europe” in the context of this article as an synecdoche for “European Union”, after mentioning the EU once. 
    Cool.  I learned a new word: “synecdoche“.   
    syn·​ec·​do·​che  | \ sə-ˈnek-də-(ˌ)kē. | sin-ek-doe-kay 
    Referring to a whole entity by using a term that refers to a part of the entity.  E.g. head: What was the head-count at the event (people).  Boots: how many boots on the ground (soldiers).  Suits: there were a lot of suits in the room (business-persons). Boards: she’s a great actor on the boards (stage).
    Minor quibble—or question?: The EU would be a part of Europe vs Europe as part of EU. 
    Yet I still got the meaning in the first post with that Europe reference. 

    haikus, I’ll look for more of your posts.  I’m curious what I might come across. 
    elijahgradarthekatAnilu_777haikusmuthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
  • Can Apple Vision Pro reinvent the computer, again?

    `...before Apple's Human User Interface Guideline writers coined the term that we today shorten to "app."`

    This is complete nonsense. The term "application", denoting software distinct from the operating system itself, goes back to the 1950's at least.

    The word ‘program’ was pretty dominant when I wrote programs in 1966 on punchcards for a mainframe.  
    Windows users and developers generally called their software: ‘programs’ while Mac users and developers generally called their software: ’applications’. 

    In 2008 Apple opened its App Store playing not only on an abbreviation of Application but also the first three letters of Apple.  It may be possible we referred to applications as apps for shorthand prior to the App Store but it was not in general use as it would become after the App Store opening and Apple’s reference to Apps.  

    I don’t have a perfect memory nor time travel, but I was very involved with mainframes and then the Apple II and the Macintosh as a user and in writing code and scripts. So this is my best recollection. 
    i hope you can ease up on using angry words like “complete nonsense”. I’m sorry you’re angry. 

    “Anger and blame are a poison you think will get the other guy, but it is corrosive to your own soul and eats you up from the inside.” Author unknown. 
    aderuttermuthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobradave marshFileMakerFellerfreeassociate2kiltedgreenjwdawsobaconstang
  • No M3 13-inch MacBook Pro at 'Scary Fast' event, says Gurman

    1.)   I don’t think anyone has predicted that 24” iMacs might be upgraded not only with M2 but also with M2 Pro and M2 Max SOC as “scary fast” options. I’d expect the M2 Max will be faster than the base M3.

    For the iMac 24”, that could be a “scary” fast option of interest for many—including folks with a Studio Display they already have or would get so they’d have a two monitor system with power in the tank. 

    There could be an introduction of a 27” or 30” or 32” iMac with the M2 Pro or M2 Max.   That would make sense. It would fill a long time stretch of no upgrades on that product. The M2 Pro & M2 Max are already in production and this would avoid the supply crunch on the M3 SOC. 

    2.)  Another thought is—why would Apple schedule a reveal and compete for audience just when game 3 of the World Series starts?

    Maybe the reveal will followed by (or be in) a series of ads during the World Series game, with a bigger ad just before the game start of 5:03pm PDT, and a repeat or second ad during 7th inning stretch.  And short 20 second or less ads during the game hi-lighting gaming on iPhone and the new iMacs as reinforcement teasers. It would be a rather larger audience and during a sporting event, in which they might also reveal expanded MLB showings beyond the Friday night deal. 

    tenthousandthingswilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Apple is asking iPhone suppliers for screens without any bezel

    mayfly said:
    There is a phrase in this article that understates what I'd think is a much bigger issue:
    "increased vulnerability to external shocks"

    With no metal bezel surrounding a glass lens, seems like it would be way more likely to break due to accidents that current phones survive intact. They're going to have to explore a radically different glass technology to prevent that. Or they could just use current glass tech, and make more money on repairs, I suppose.
    Hint... the "lens" is not made of glass.
    I’ve heard the glass covering the display on the iPhone referred to as ‘lens’ in the past.  It might be ‘engineer-speak’ or a British term.  In the US, we think a lens is on the camera or in glasses, a microscope or telescope. A lens is glass ( or clear plastic) we look through that transmits light and bends the light to form an image that is enlarged, reduced or otherwise distorted. Yet we have sunglasses the have no distortion, just a filtering of light. So, yes, I can see the display glass referred to as a lens. 

    Where we in the US refer to a ‘hood’ on the front of a car, the Brits say ‘bonnet’. What we call a ‘windshield’ is referred to as a ‘windscreen’ by Brits.  I can see calling the face of the iPhone a lens that we look through to see the image displayed on or under film layers. 
    Gorilla glass that Apple uses has had many iterations over the years.  It approaches the hardness and scratch resistance of some metals.  Tougher than nails. 
    I’d think that’s the protection that does the job, unless the display film comes all the way to the edge of the glass—and can be harmed by just the edge being hit. 

    My concern could be reliable touch rejection from gripping the iPhone with fingers encroaching on the edges of the display. I’d take a guess that Apple thought of that a long time ago and it won’t be a problem. I guess I’m not really concerned about that after all.
    designrwatto_cobra
  • Bring HomeKit to your Christmas tree with Festavia string lights

    Phillips Hue site via the article link, has no info or reference to Philips Hue Festavia string lights. That’s odd. 
    AppleInsider has info but a search as well as perusing the Phillips Hue site has no info or announcement. 

    I was hoping to see examples of the lighting options as word descriptions in the article could have different interpretations. 
    I hope I remember to check their site on November 15th in my busy life. I’ll make a calendar event to remind me. 
    Japhey
  • Wedbush: AI & pent-up iPhone 16 demand outweigh concerns over China sales

    twolf2919 said:
    With respect to "pent-up demand for iPhone 16", Wedbush made the same claim when justifying their price target before iPhone 15 came out.  I guess a broken clock is going to be right  at least twice a day?  …
    Well, if sales prediction of “picked up demand” last year didn’t come through, then that’s all the more carrying forward for pent-up demand this coming Fall.

    “… twolf2919 also said:
    “20% of Apple's sales come from China alone.  The economic situation there as well as the geopolitical rivalry with the US won't be resolved anytime soon, so I doubt sales there will improve in the near future.  Another poster mentioned India growth offsetting China sales losses.  I don't believe that.  First of all, sales in India are tiny in comparison.  Yes, they are growing nicely, but it'll be years before they approach the sales volume in China.”

    JellyBelly responding to twoIf2919:
    India growth does not have to equal all of China’s sales, it only needs to equal the drop in sales in China.

    JellyBelly comment in general:
    The Titan project was secretive regarding specific technology advances.  What was learned about object recognition and automotive systems will be very valuable as a contribution to Apples’s future application of this tech IP, that’s has been behind a company internal firewall.  While not making a car product, Apple could partner with one or more auto companies to license some of this IP on a non-disclosure basis—or a branded basis—albeit if branded, would require partner pay liability insurance for Apple. 

    The here-to-fore Titan skunkworks/firewalled/hidden tech will be a great addition to Apples AI tech.  
    While considering pundits’ criticism of Apple’s AI technology shortfalls, we have to remember several things:

    1.) Apple has always been reticent to discuss its technology advancements until it’s ready to drop a product using those advancements. 

    2.) Apple likes to under hype new product development until it’s revealed and has a release date.  

    3.) Apple likes to overachieve expectations, letting users discover many features that are not even part of product introductions. 

    4.) Every one of Apple’s, successful products in the last 27 years has been preceded by Apple being criticized for not having an equivalent product in the market to some existing technology.  And then, boom Apple releases a criticized product that brings new unfamiliar features that bring success to the new product within three years—and soon copied in the industry.  And their new product is the one with no equivalent elsewhere the market. 

    5.) Despite Apple’s mention of something in AI coming in the future, its history shows that it will tend to under-hype it—and then let the product or features create their own hype. And Apple also has a history that it doesn’t release products or features until they are ready—or ready to be refined and improved.

    6.) So far, many of Apple’s failures seem to have been opportunities to learn and apply with refinement.














    jas99tmayBart Ywatto_cobra