solipsismy
About
- Username
- solipsismy
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 5
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 5,099
Reactions
Comments
-
frank777 wrote: » I love how you state "they just need" like this would be a simple thing to do. I agree that the wording isn't the best, but I think the rest of his statement puts it into context. How about: "[In order to effectively] make …
-
iaeen wrote: » I tried using my watch to scan the boarding pass last time I flew. It was awkward because the watch face shut off every time I tilted my wrist to put it in the scanner. Apple really needs to deactivate automatic shutoff when passboo…
-
Where are the surveys about the original iPhone? I seem to remember the biggest issue was a lack of features, which I think is an [I]actual[/I] valid argument for not getting the original iPhone. No 3G, no cut/copy/paste, no 3rd-paryt app support, n…
-
cnocbui wrote: » I would agree it's better now. The sound quality from my Macbook unibody was pretty poor, with low level hiss and digital artifacts. That was probably Intel's Integrated High Definition Audio not being well implemented at the ti…
-
ladybumps wrote: » It may be just me but does anyone else still press the wrong button in the wrong way to get the ?Pay screen? Not that I can recall. I use Apple Pay on average at least once a day, and it's mostly via my Watch. Double click th…
-
entropys wrote: » I can't believe I am saying this, but what would Steve do? You know the answer. He wouldn't have let the MacBook Air languish, How quickly we forget or whitewash history into something that didn't exist. How many times did AI …
-
davidslaton wrote: » Uninformed? I look at it every day and the screen sucks, it's retina from 3 feet away. I can't wait till they fix it and give the stupid watch a cellular radio. 1) Retina from 3 feet away means you're vision is 20/5? 2) …
-
foggyhill wrote: » From the Wiki with all the PPI of Apple products. Could be wrong though. But, it's still retina no matter what number is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retina_Display Their diagonal display size and resolutions are correct P…
-
foggyhill wrote: » The screen is retina: 290 PPI; so, another uninformed comment. Come on, continue. How did you get 290 PPI? Did you measure using the height of watch face, not the display itself? https://twitter.com/reneritchie/status/59939…
-
davidslaton wrote: » Had always really bothered me the screen is not retina, it's embarrassingly pixelated. Just not worth the money in my opinion It's 326-ish PPI, the same as the iPhones have been since 2010.
-
radarthekat wrote: » I think I sold an Apple Watch one day at the local farmer's market. Standing in line behind me was a guy with two little kids. He spotted my Watch and asked, "is that the Apple Watch?" I affirmed it was, and he asked how I …
-
Lack of features is interesting considering how many features this had to come out of the gate with just to be the success that it is. I would have thought one of the biggest complaints would have been too many features make it too confusing to use …
-
wizard69 wrote: » I still believe Apple will release something early in 2016 as soon as Intel has the proper chips for sale. We need to consider it's not when Intel has the proper Skylake chips for sale, it's when they have enough of the proper…
-
mac_128 wrote: » Or, maybe it will be something more practical like this for the original iPhone, which moves the connection and DAC further down the cable, like volume controls, for instance Movie the DAC is always an option. All BT headphones…
-
canukstorm wrote: » I guess if Apple if uses one their custom-designed A-series SoC's. I'm not so sure about Intel Core M processors I think that idea needs to be considered as a possibility for their lower-end machines in the near-ish future.
-
canukstorm wrote: » is that even possible without degrading performance or thermal issues? Of course. We're at this point from advancements in architecture and lithography advancements.
-
jakeb wrote: » Doesn't make sense to have something called the "Air" not be the lightest thinnest model. And how could you possibly go lighter thinner than the new Macbook? I agree, so why didn't they call the new 12' MacBook a MacBook Air.…
-
djacopille wrote: » Apple now has four different lines of laptop: MacBook Pro, MacBook MacBook Air, and the new iPad Pro (declared a laptop replacement by Tim himself). I agree with that premise. Four distinct lines in this increasingly sma…
-
ireland wrote: » I disagree. You're thinking like a geek. Apple doesn't think or operator like that. What you're describing is a future you want, not one Apple wants IMO. It amazes me how many comments come from the vantage point of "This is wh…
-
rogifan wrote: » Good luck with that. Right?¡ It would be impossible to add another architecture in there with Xcode support for fat binaries¡ Apple has absolutely no experience with that¡ In fact, they are so lucky that they built iOS from not…