danox

Prior art dating back to the 1840’s…. Karl Matthes, Glenn Millikan, and Takuo Aoyagi were prominent in the development of pulse-oximetry in the 20th century.

https://www.cablesandsensors.com/pages/history-of-pulse-oximetry If anyone should be suing, maybe it should be Hewlett Packard or Takuo Aoyagi. Most of the basic ideas was done (conceived) by others, the advancement of mechanical engineering technology allowed the equipment to be made smaller and more compact in time, what would have been new to them would have been all of the advancements made in alloys and materials over the years which was used to build smaller more compact devices, however the core functionality, would have been recognizable to them. Massimo and Apple merely built upon/on their shoulders, the prior art of many others who came before them starting with an idea in the 1840’s.

pixeltini said:

Hmm, who could have guessed interfering with law enforcement efforts would be illegal? It's no different than attempting to block a police vehicle doing its duty to protect Americans against those who would do us harm. You know… gang members, drug dealers, convicted felons, cartel thugs, human traffickers, and so on.

And let's call out the specious idea that Ice Block is no different than a radar detector or warning drivers of a speed trap. A speed zone warning is an alert to POTENTIAL law breakers. Ice Block interferes with police efforts to apprehend individuals who have ALREADY BROKEN AT LEAST ONE LAW. Do you see the difference? Well do you?

Pardon me for using logic and pointing out the obvious. Now go ahead and hurl the Leftist phrases you learned from CNN.