bobolicious
About
- Username
- bobolicious
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,587
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,720
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 1,203
Reactions
-
Benchmarks show that Intel's Alder Lake chips aren't M1 Max killers
jkichline said:bobolicious said:Well if one needs GPU performance - I am running into software for example that simply will not run (bricked) without a beefy GPU...
from the Macworld article:
59,774 Apple M1 Max 32 core GPU
143,594 nVidia 3080 Ti
240% faster, presumably not 'within margin of error'
Even more pronounced seem the desktop options (AMD) with the relatively inexpensive nVidia 3060 outperforming passmark scores for many higher priced cards as well as having 12GB VRAM www.bestbuy.com/site/evga-nvidia-geforce-rtx-3060-xc-gaming-12gb-gddr6-pci-express-4-0-graphics-card/6454329.p?skuId=6454329
I understood Apple is working on a 'boost' option which may help, and will presumably also ramp up the power and fan requirements...?
For what it is worth I value quiet operation at the expense of performance unless needed, and yet if developers start bricking apps for their preferred GPU configuration is that more troubling than debating top spec performance, and the next great Apple Trojan Horse to 'encourage' hardware sales...?
-
Benchmarks show that Intel's Alder Lake chips aren't M1 Max killers
Well if one needs GPU performance - I am running into software for example that simply will not run (bricked) without a beefy GPU...
from the Macworld article:
59,774 Apple M1 Max 32 core GPU
143,594 nVidia 3080 Ti
240% faster, presumably not 'within margin of error'
Even more pronounced seem the desktop options (AMD) with the relatively inexpensive nVidia 3060 outperforming passmark scores for many higher priced cards as well as having 12GB VRAM www.bestbuy.com/site/evga-nvidia-geforce-rtx-3060-xc-gaming-12gb-gddr6-pci-express-4-0-graphics-card/6454329.p?skuId=6454329
I understood Apple is working on a 'boost' option which may help, and will presumably also ramp up the power and fan requirements...? -
Continued iOS 14 security updates were meant to be temporary, Apple says
...I wish Apple would slow everything down especially macOS which seemed to be released on merit (every 2~3 years through 2011) vs a calendar basis which may serve annual shareholder interests...
This lack of continuity has created at this customer end a ton of overhead juggling app compatibility and for example the orphaning of 32 bit apps also came with a flurry of upgrade costs for various apps, many switching from the persistent licensing 'gold rush' to the unsustainable subscription model. Is this the opposite of Windows with long support cycles and recognition of such burdens on business? I understand 32 bit apps are still supported in Windows...?
I just asked a developer today if Windows is now easier than the mac and in suit a better 'customer experience'...? -
Apple's 2019 Mac Pro is now three PCIe revisions behind
-
Apple's 2022 monitor rumored to be half the price of the Pro Display XDR
mcdave said:lkrupp said:rob53 said:aderutter said:At this price it might make more sense to buy an iMac and a LunaDisplay. Apple need to release a monitor that is priced less than an iMac.
everymac.com/monitors/apple/thunderbolt/specs/apple-thunderbolt-display-27-inch-specs.html
A 4K USBC upgrade would be enough for me. Is 5K Apple's 'bag of hurt'...?
I wish I felt like Apple was now being governed by enthusiasts vs money men...
Does every movement become a business?
Does every era have its day...?