Soli

About

Username
Soli
Joined
Visits
174
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
17,060
Badges
2
Posts
10,038
  • AirTag hacked and reprogrammed by security researcher

    OT: @Soli, nice to see you back. Where have you been?
    It's good to be back.

    (more)

    But that's all higher up in the OSI model. Even if you could use all connection-less protocols (read: protocols that don't establish a prior connection before transmitting) they still need would need to be run on on a connected network at the lower layers before they can operate and then would need other layers to verify that data was received. Even something as basic as plugging in an Ethernet cable connects something. In this case it's physical connection, and that can sometimes be the problem if there is a fault in the hardware.

    Each connection opens up the possibly for more complex connections but the model still works the same regards of how technologies evolve. I've spent decades designing, building, optimizing, and troubleshooting networks. I can't tell you have many times I've had to come in to resolve was I was told were unsolvable problems that turned out that they were simply digging at the wrong layer, so to speak. I can't fault those who don't work in IT for not knowing, but I'll be forever perplexed by someone in IT that can't figure out why someone's [insert app] isn't connecting without them ever trying to ping an IP, go to another website, or even check the bloody physical connection to narrow down the scope of the problem. A systematic approach has never failed me.

    I preciously used the example of establishing links to satellites because there is no handshake. Usually you see the word link in this context, but a link is just a connection. First the physical layer, which will mean the radios and antennas with the correct modulation for that medium and without obstructions/interference. If these aren't congruent then there is no connection. Period. Then the data link layer, and so on. These are still connections even if we don't see a physical cable running to the satellite, without a three-way handshake between nodes, and without the satellite verifying that we're receiving data.

    PS: I'm still laughing about someone saying that Bluetooth and NFC aren't a part of networking. I guess this place hasn't changed much.


    Xed
  • Blood oxygen sensor, Touch ID rumored for 'watchOS 7,' Apple Watch 'Series 6'

    danvdr said:
    Seems to me that
    (more)
    GeorgeBMacspheric
  • Second 2020 iPad teardown shows how LiDAR differs from Face ID

    Beats said:
    Soli said:
    Beats said:
    (more)
    So he's correct. If Truedepth is indeed better than we can be sure it will be added to later models as it compliments AR.
    Maybe not. TrueDepth might be better for details when looking at a predisposed object that it's expecting to verify with a map and at a close, predetermined range expectation (well within an arm's length), compared to another use of lidar* that is designed for mapping countless objects in significantly larger area (a room). Kind of like having a macro lens for taking a picture of a mountain range and then arguing that that macro lens is better because it can get higher detail of a specific object.


    * I keep seeing LiDAR spelled this way. Just stick with lidar like we have for radar, laser and the uncommon maser (even though it predates laser and follows its pattern).

    Probably because the lower case "i" has been all the rage since the early 2000s. I still cringe when I see knockoffs use it though.
    It's not an Apple thing. It's because the 'i' isn't it's own word, but part of the word light, just as you could've once found RaDAR as it uses the 'a' from the word Radio along with d(etection) a(nd) r(anging), for both acronyms.

    I'm still unsure what's stopping Apple from making their lidar system more accurate or Truedepth have wider range.

    Why are you assuming Apple is "stopping"? Clearly their years of work with lidar is being applied to devics to make them better, faster, and more accurate with every iteration. Because they didn't call it TrueDepth and it doesn't have the exact same feature set as lidar being used with other sensors for a very specific use case on the front of the camera? You don't want the system on the back to work for Face ID and you don't want Face ID to map a room. That should be clear.
    brometheusgatorguycornchipwatto_cobra
  • Blood oxygen sensor, Touch ID rumored for 'watchOS 7,' Apple Watch 'Series 6'

    Mgwl said:
    I read in a review on the
    (more)
    Do you have Hey Siri or raise to wake enabled? I have those off which greatly increases my battery life. 
    Beats
  • Blood oxygen sensor, Touch ID rumored for 'watchOS 7,' Apple Watch 'Series 6'

    I read in a review on the Samsung watch the battery life is up to 48 hours.  But, using LTE it lasted 3 hours...

    This might not be comparable
    (more)
    BeatsGeorgeBMaccaladaniansphericfastasleep