leehericks
About
- Username
- leehericks
- Joined
- Visits
- 32
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 280
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 41
Reactions
-
Apple's 15-inch MacBook Air: Rumors, and what to expect
-
How the new Mac Studio fills a crucial gap in Apple's desktop lineup
-
Apple uses Messages colors to bully Android users, says Google
-
Klobuchar defends bill that would bar Big Tech from preferring their own services
darkvader said:How does anybody claim with a straight face that something like this that will obviously help consumers could possibly 'hurt consumers'?Oh, right. Bribery.Nothing about bribery, wtf. I'll tell you with a straight face, that as an iPhone user since iPhone 3G and an iOS developer, all this legislature is ridiculous and I don't want the government forcing changes to it.
You don't tell Best Buy not to promote their protection plans, instead let someone else offer an insurance service in your store.
You don't tell Nintendo not to promote their first-party games on the console platform they created.
Why should you tell Apple they can't promote services to enrich the iPhone experience, on the platform they created? -
Google fined $177M by South Korea for abusing smartphone dominance
Fragmenting an OS is an awful idea. Google needs to open source because they are built on an os foundation but...the resulting product should be licensable no?
I think if they fork Android, they shouldn't be able to call it Android and no Google services. Seems fair enough. Google should be able to withhold unique and expensive developments from the open source version as well.
Just Samsung and government corruption.