Mike Wuerthele
About
- Username
- Mike Wuerthele
- Joined
- Visits
- 178
- Last Active
- Roles
- administrator
- Points
- 23,995
- Badges
- 3
- Posts
- 7,272
Reactions
-
Epic versus Apple: What's at stake if Apple loses
foregoneconclusion said:Mike Wuerthele said: So, like the first section and last paragraphs of the article point out: If Apple loses, it will have to make changes. Steering is the most likely thing to have to change, versus the rest of the consequences listed.
IMO, the problem with the "what if" is it's not really a legal perspective at all. The judge isn't going to rule based on whether or not certain items appear easier to implement. If Epic didn't make a legal case for it, it won't matter whether something is easy or hard.
Ultimately, we'll all see together. -
Actual US broadband penetration & speed falls far short of FCC claims
steven n. said:This is the telling part:
“The blue-colored areas are U.S. counties where less than 15% of people are using the internet at a 25Mbps download speed, which is the FCC's definition of high-speed internet.”
The FCC judges by available. Microsoft judges by using. Two very different metrics. I would not expect The Verge’s sophomoric “journalism” to pick up on this.
The FCC judges by what the ISPs say, and it doesn't even have to be available beyond one address. Microsoft judges by use. -
Actual US broadband penetration & speed falls far short of FCC claims
cg27 said:Really, imagine that, Alaska doesn’t have coverage in most areas. Nor Texas in sparsely populated areas. Go figure. Come on, let’s apply some common sense. Companies aren’t going to invest where it’s not justified.
Also, this is precisely where the SpaceX StarLink is most apt. -
Epic Games vs Apple -- The continuing App Store saga
canukstorm said:johnbear said:nytesky said:The reason Epic can make so much money, is that Apple, Google, Microsoft and Sony have put a lot of R&D and marketing into iOS, Android, Xbox and Playstation. If Epic wants to sell direct to the consumer, they should make their own hardware. They want to leech off Apple and Google, but are willing to pay 30% to Microsoft and Sony (for now).
The shoplifting analogy that Apple uses isn't very good. It is more like Epic setting up shop and selling things inside an Apple Store without paying any rent; Epic cries in the store that they made the products they are selling not Apple, so Apple should let them stay there for free.On the other hand Epic acted out of desperation and not in a very wise and strategic manner. -
Rudy Giuliani says warrant illegal since agents already had data 'from the iCloud'
rob53 said:tnet-primary said:There is literally no reason for this to be an article on AI. Because he used the term “iCloud” in his argument? And the last three paragraphs of the article - general commentary on Apple’s work with government requests - have been covered, ad nauseam, in other pieces.
Stay out of politics, please.
Speaking of Rudy, if he knows so much about an iPhone and iCloud, he should have taken precautions and not stored his backup and, maybe photos, on iCloud. Store them only on your Mac/PC and make sure they're encrypted.
In regards to what's stored in iCloud, versus what's only on the iPhone -- there is a list in the piece. As it pertains to "app data" - this depends on the app in question, and there is no real way to list what's stored there by every individual app. As a general rule, if there is an "iCloud sync" option in the app, Apple holds that data and will provide it upon subpoena.