M68000

1982Applelb2Service said:

The cart was most like to work at Best Buy stores with a little difference configuration. But at the price of these VR headsets, I am not sure who is really going to be able to afford it. Working at a Best Buy over Christmas you see retail sales slumping dramaticly. I worked for Facebook Meta a year ago, and I even had a hard time selling a $500 headset to customers.
When most of the jobs in the county only pay like $18 dollars an hours, these headsets will never take off at this price point, I even saw people not buying the Meta Quest 3 and buying the Meta Quest 2, even being 4 year old VR technology it sold better than the Quest 3 this christmas.

danox said:

charlesn said:

Oh, the irony. First, for all the "Apple's prices are too high," posts, its most expensive phone--and the only phone to have its base price raised in the U.S.--is Apple's best seller, and not by a small margin. Second, that 5X tetraprism lens which is helping to drive sales is easily outperformed by the 3X lens it replaced in most picture-taking situations where the telephoto lens is used. (Many comparison photos in online reviews, including the review published by AI, document this.) It is only when shooting at focal lengths of 120mm and above that the new lens is superior. 

The iPhone 15 Pro is going to be an even bigger seller when people see the spacial video results with the Apple Vision.....

Apple is always told by the MBA/Financial Analyst types that going cheap large marketshare is the answer for everything.

Rogue01 said:

applebynature said:

Yup, we've known about the required facial scanning for proper fit since June.
I'm curious how big of a fiasco it's going to be to go into an Apple Store to demo a unit. They should do it by appointment with a required face scan before the appointment so everything is ready for you to try out. If they're just allowing everyone to come in to wait around in the store for one of the scarce demo units to be available, then having to go through a fitting and set up process along with being trained how to use it, man that will be a disaster with the time involved and so many waiting around to try it. But on the other hand, I can see people going to the store to try it out and being told, oh you have to make an appointment, the next one is in 3 weeks, and that not going over too well with customers either, so who knows.

At $3,500, no one is really interested in this at all.  So probably won't be any lines of people waiting to try it because people would rather spend $3,500 on anything else.  This product does not solve any problems and AR/VR has never been a popular item for decades.  People don't want to wear googles to run apps or watch movies.  The battery is about 2 hours unless you are physically tied to a power source.  Apple created something that no one really has any desire for.  Maybe super rich people that have nothing better to spend money on.  No one bought iPod Hi-Fi, and that was only $349.  No one bought the $10,000 Apple Watch Gold either and Apple said you had to have an appointment to see it.  The iPhone captured the smartphone market.  This captures no market at all.  Big difference.  I love Apple and have been using Apple products since 1989, but you have to wonder why Apple even made this product when consumers are not really into that product category at all.  Very few consumers use AR for games.

And remember, most consumers wear prescription lenses so another $150 for special lenses will a big deal breaker, especially when prescriptions typically change year after year for people that do wear glasses.