Japhey
About
- Username
- Japhey
- Joined
- Visits
- 80
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 4,994
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,773
Reactions
-
Apple Vision Pro $3,499 mixed-reality headset launches at WWDC after years of rumors
Not fully hatched?gatorguy said:It does not seem like a very Apple-y product, but that's not unexpected either. It's a first gen, and according to reports was intended for developers anyway. Three years out they may have something. At the moment it seems like it was pushed out to the retail market before it's fully hatched, and I'm not sure why altho I could guess there's some other nearly-finished products from potential competitors coming before the year is out.
No doubt some regular users here will rush to buy a Vision Pro anyway; after all, it's from Apple. By the time it's fully developed in gen 3 I would expect it to be half to a third of the current price. That's when it may capture my interest. Or not.It seems like they put a lot of love and energy into addressing all the shortcomings other AR headset suffer from. So I’m just curious as to what you need to see for it to be considered “fully hatched ”?
-
Apple Vision Pro $3,499 mixed-reality headset launches at WWDC after years of rumors
Those magnetic lenses were really cool, imo.eightzero said:Intriguing and worth trying in a store. I can tell how it would work for me, as I require corrective lenses.
-
Apple Vision Pro $3,499 mixed-reality headset launches at WWDC after years of rumors
No surprise all the haters rushed to be the first to comment.And all before the announcement was even over, lol.
-
You'll be lucky to get an Apple headset before Christmas, says Ming-Chi Kuo
I’ll be lucky if I can afford one by Christmas, much less be able to find one, lol. And I’ve had 3 years or so to plan for them. -
As you may expect, the internet already says that Apple's headset is doomed, apparently
There is a whole lot of grey in between the black and white reality you attempt to paint. Kierkegaarden raises a legitimate and reasonable point, even though the way they did it made you feel sad.jdw said:Kierkegaarden said:...anyone who gives their opinion on a product based on the design, features, or price of a product before those details are even known is an absolute moron.The internet has allowed morons to share their moronic thoughts with others. The ones that listen turn into morons themselves. This is the real pandemic — welcome to the internet: home of the moron flu.
Perhaps the greatest disappointment of all in online forums is the incessant name-calling and the emojis which follow in support of the name-calling. Basically, the uncaring remarks above are labeling nearly everyone here a "moron" for having commented. That is not constructive. It amounts to little more than an emotionally charged distraction.Japhey said:<fist emoji>
It is a part of human nature to comment on pretty much everything. That is why this forum exists.
It is easier to name-call than to write intelligently. So many choose the easy path. But the better approach is to present a reasoned commentary based on what we know now (which admittedly is limited) and based on what we speculate. There is no harm in that. Indeed, it provokes positive thought.
Why do I even care? Because reading the comments under articles is often more pleasing than the articles themselves, at least until we get to the name-calling.
Ditto my earlier comment. I now look forward to seeing WWDC.Bring on WWDC. I can’t wait to see how many people flip sides and pretend like they knew all along how great it would be. At the very least we will have an actual, real object to discuss…because all these people unilaterally calling a still nonexistent product a failure just because they don’t approve of (x) rumor are getting really tiresome.
