Xed

About

Username
Xed
Joined
Visits
178
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
11,146
Badges
2
Posts
3,278
  • Trump vs. Harris: How to watch the September 10 Presidential debate online

    M68000 said:
    jimh2 said:
    Why would anyone subject themselves to a debate. I'll summarize...lots of name calling and accusing followed by Trump winging it and Harris parroting off scripted answers. If you want substantive analysis you will need a source like the NYT. They are definitely slanted towards Harris and inflammatory towards Trump but they do make an effort to layout the issues and stances.
    It seems the candidates do not know the questions or topics ahead of time, unlike cupcake prerecorded interviews on some networks..  This is going to be really interesting because they have to respond on the fly.  
    Tonight might be different but historically the candidates know the topics in advance but not the questions. This cycle is weird though. Normally the Commission on Presidential Debates manages the debates then picks a theme for each one (Foreign Policy, Economy and so on). For whatever reason the campaigns have decided to forego that this year and just work it out between each other and the networks. 
    Hillary knew the questions. LOL. Can't make that stuff up. So the truth is... who knows?
    Apparently you can make it up and not only can you make it up you can also dupe people into repeating it as fact. 


    Hillary didn’t have the questions and you should consider finding better news sources. 

    But hey, left-wing snipes is never wrong and hasn’t had to correct their own falsehoods about trump statements, hunters laptop, Biden snoozing during ceremony, etc. 

    not you know, you could have the incident wrong. 

    Lesson: if you’re going to correct someone, you should probably be right. Not this.  
    What's this weird obsession about a consumer electronic device of someone not in public office? The fact that you have to go after the troubled son of a politician says something about you as a person and how there's nothing on Biden you can sink your teeth into.

    For example Bobo (Lauren Boebart) has a very troubled son and that's very sad and hopefully she'll be as much as a responsible parent as Biden has been with regard for letting the law do its thing with regard to his son for his actions. But you don't have to focus on her son —whose name I don't even know — when there are so many stupid, unethical, and disgusting things in which to focus on with Bobo.
    ronn9secondkox2gatorguywatto_cobra
  • Trump vs. Harris: How to watch the September 10 Presidential debate online

    The debate is a formality.
    I've never considered a slaughter as a formality. Trump failed worse than expected.
     One candidate has kept their word over and over and proven to be beneficial for the country.
    LOL Whether you actually believe that Trump has kept his word or whether you're just another shameful liar and grifter supporting your kind, it's still laughable or you to write it.
    9secondkox2kurai_kageronnchasmsphericwatto_cobra
  • Trump vs. Harris: How to watch the September 10 Presidential debate online


    ronn said:
    I don't need a debate. The choice is that clear: A proven track record for VP Harris who is up against a convicted felon that will do anything to avoid jail. All that talk about President Biden's cognitive decline while the traitor clearly has lost the few marbles he had. MSM want him to be as foul as possible to garner clicks and $$$.
    You clearly haven't watched a single source that shows Trump talking actual points to think like that. You are being manipulated.
    To each their own, but I can't stand behind a pedophile, convicted rapist, felon, adulterer, and scammer that has never had success with a legitimate business and did nothing but steal from the American people and everyone that has ever worked for him despite having had everything handed to him without ever having to deal with consequences. And that's before we get to America being better off under Biden and before that better off under Obama. I’m neither a Republican nor a Democrat and I agree with George Washington regarding political parties, and yet I sure wish there was an actual Republican in the running against Harris in which to make a decision. MAGA is the ultimate RINO and FOX News is, by definition, the main stream media.

    https://teachingamericanhistory.org/blog/george-washington-on-political-parties/
    ronnStabitha_Christie9secondkox2ciakurai_kagenetroxchasmfastasleeppaisleydiscospheric
  • How to use Clean Up in iOS 18 Photos to remove distractions

    kellie said:
    Apple loves the idea of on device AI tools because it will force people to upgrade their phones or Macs if they want the AI tools to work. Google at least offers a higher quality cloud option.  I doubt Apple will ever offer a cloud service for photo manipulation even though the results are currently better. 
    In the given example, Apple's on-device result are considerably better than that Google's on-server result.


    roundaboutnowneoncat
  • Apple moving forward with iPad on a robot arm as your next smarthome purchase

    Pema said:
    Every week Apple is flailing about for some other bond headed hardware. Short of Steve Jobs Apple is really 'dancing in the dark': 
    1) Apple Car - we all know what happened with that. But to save face on the billions of dollars, resources and time wasted we are led to believe that Apple was able to salvage some bits of the effort to morph into other Apple products. Like the trillions waste on moon landings to give us teflon. 
    2) Apple Foldable Phone - what a totally useless and pointless nonsensical idea. Like self-lacing sneakers. 
    3) Now we have the iPad on a Robot - you have to wonder whether this is an early April Fools 2025. 
    4) Not to mention the egregious waste of time and money on scraping stale data, aka AI. I wonder how long this foolishness will continue before someone wakes up and says, hey, the king has no clothes and the whole kit and caboodle blows up like the dot.com bubble. 

    Why doesn't Apple invest in the best possible piece of technology for this year and the rest: SECURITY. Everyday you read about someone, or some organisation getting scammed. Apple is already well-versed in all things Security - Build on that to foil the hackers. That would be money well spent than chasing rubbish that turn into dust. 
    There are a lot of argumentative fallacies in your post. I just to keep my post short, it ignores all the duds under Jobs and makes an odd leap at the end that seems to imply that because of this robot arm rumor that Apple doesn’t invest anything into security.
    tmayprogrammermattinozwilliamlondonAlex_Vwatto_cobra